Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
STC Limitations and Conditions >

STC Limitations and Conditions

Search

Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

STC Limitations and Conditions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2017 | 12:14 PM
  #11  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by Panzon
It clearly reads "and". There's no way to read it as "and/or". So you've gotta have both >=150 HP and STOL wingtips. Your wiggle room may come in how STOL wingtips are defined.
Insuficient information has been provided, and the original poster has refused to address questions. It's impossible to say, given the partial information provided, what the exact effectivity is.
Reply
Old 09-06-2017 | 08:01 AM
  #12  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Does anyone have any idea of what this STC is that he is talking about? Something with a STOL application maybe? Wing fence, leading edge cuff..?
Reply
Old 09-06-2017 | 11:01 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Default

Sorry for the delayed response folks, the STC is for a SkySign system, STC number SA2822SO.
Reply
Old 09-06-2017 | 10:18 PM
  #14  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Default

http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Gu...t=1&Count=100#

The STC regards installation of a Sky Sign Aerial Advertising System.

In reviewing the STC, it does indeed appear that effectivity includes only those aircraft that have both an engine of 150 horsepower or greater, and that have STOL wingtips installed.

The original poster's question regards those aircraft that lack STOL wingtips. In such a case, an approval will need to be had to install STOL wingtips, or an effort may be undertaken to get DER/DAR assistance in securing an approval without the STOL wingtips as a field modification; that may be possible with the assistance of the original STC holder, at least insofar as the use of that particular STC.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IFLY22
Aviation Law
10
10-26-2011 01:43 PM
DeadStick
Technical
4
02-25-2011 06:57 PM
Mattio
Aviation Law
3
11-08-2010 08:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices