Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > >
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-05-2017, 12:14 PM   #11
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,176

Originally Posted by Panzon View Post
It clearly reads "and". There's no way to read it as "and/or". So you've gotta have both >=150 HP and STOL wingtips. Your wiggle room may come in how STOL wingtips are defined.
Insuficient information has been provided, and the original poster has refused to address questions. It's impossible to say, given the partial information provided, what the exact effectivity is.
JohnBurke is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2017, 08:01 AM   #12
Gets Weekends Off
trip's Avatar
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 962

Does anyone have any idea of what this STC is that he is talking about? Something with a STOL application maybe? Wing fence, leading edge cuff..?
trip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2017, 11:01 AM   #13
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 33

Sorry for the delayed response folks, the STC is for a SkySign system, STC number SA2822SO.
skyhwk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2017, 10:18 PM   #14
Disinterested Third Party
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,176


The STC regards installation of a Sky Sign Aerial Advertising System.

In reviewing the STC, it does indeed appear that effectivity includes only those aircraft that have both an engine of 150 horsepower or greater, and that have STOL wingtips installed.

The original poster's question regards those aircraft that lack STOL wingtips. In such a case, an approval will need to be had to install STOL wingtips, or an effort may be undertaken to get DER/DAR assistance in securing an approval without the STOL wingtips as a field modification; that may be possible with the assistance of the original STC holder, at least insofar as the use of that particular STC.
JohnBurke is online now   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
135 Turbine Landing Limitations Question IFLY22 Aviation Law 10 10-26-2011 01:43 PM
121 Flight Time Limitations Question DeadStick Technical 4 02-25-2011 06:57 PM
121 Turboprob Landing Limitations Mattio Aviation Law 3 11-08-2010 08:37 PM

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:18 AM.

vBulletin® v3.9.3.3, Copyright ©2000-2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2000 - 2017 Internet Brands, Inc.