Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Technical
121 Flight Time Limitations Question >

121 Flight Time Limitations Question

Search
Notices
Technical Technical aspects of flying

121 Flight Time Limitations Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2011, 10:51 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 607
Default 121 Flight Time Limitations Question

Quick question regarding "Legal to Start, Legal to Finish":

Yesterday I was assigned the below trip:

DEP ARR BLK
FLT 1 AAA - BBB 0900 - 1045 145
FLT 2 BBB - AAA 1200 - 1345 145
FLT 3 AAA - BBB 1500 - 1645 145
FLT 4 BBB - AAA 1800 - 1945 145

TOTAL BLOCK 700

This is what my schedule ended up being:

DEP ARR BLK
FLT 1 AAA - BBB 0900 - 1100 200
FLT 2 BBB - AAA 1200 - 1500 300
FLT 3 AAA - AAA 1530 - 1600 30 Return to Gate for MX
FLT 3 AAA - BBB 1630 - 1815 145
FLT 4 BBB - AAA 1930 - 2115 145

TOTAL BLOCK 900

I ended up refusing to fly the last leg because, in my understanding, legal to start legal to finish only applies when the schedule hasn't been modified. While I acknowledge that the RTG does not count as flight time in regard to scheduled limitations, I argued that at that point the schedule had been "modified" as a new city pairing had been added, and the pairing number went from "EX3000A" to "EX3000B".

So, what is defined as "start" in the legal to finish, legal to start conundrum? Is the schedule "restarted" after a return to gate or diversion?

I read the entirety of the ALPA "Guide to Flight Time Limitations and Rest Requirements" and couldn't find it.

http://cf.alpa.org/internet/projects...6-A_June04.pdf

Here's what FAR 121.471 (g) states:

A flight crewmember is not considered to be scheduled for flight time in excess of flight time limitations if the flights to which he is assigned are scheduled and normally terminate within the limitations, but due to circumstances beyond the control of the certificate holder (such as adverse weather conditions), are not at the time of departure expected to reach their destination within the scheduled time.


*Example and times adjusted for simplicity.
DeadStick is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 01:56 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,730
Default

Flight time would not have been an issue, you could have gone. The FAA example has a crew divert to an alternate, repo back to the planned destination and still depart for the last leg.

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...2009/Banks.pdf


One thing they point out is you still have to be able to look back and find your rest. If you get 30 minutes after block in, for your 5th leg you'd have to be able to say at 19:30 that at 21:45 you could still look back and find 10 hours of rest.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:24 PM
  #3  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by DeadStick View Post

I ended up refusing to fly the last leg because, in my understanding, legal to start legal to finish only applies when the schedule hasn't been modified. While I acknowledge that the RTG does not count as flight time in regard to scheduled limitations, I argued that at that point the schedule had been "modified" as a new city pairing had been added, and the pairing number went from "EX3000A" to "EX3000B".
I think you are confusing company internal information systems with "schedules".

The company pairing number does not matter. The fact that the RTG was "added" to your schedule does not matter, because it was really NOT added for FAA purposes. The RTG was not a "schedule change" it was an irregular operation, which are allowed under "legal to start"

Your original schedule involved two turns. That is what you actually flew, so nothing changed.

The gold standard for what constitutes a "schedule" change would be flying to different cities than originally planned, or flying different flight numbers.

An added leg AAA-CCC would have been a schedule change. If they canx the second AAA-BBB turn and had you instead fly a AAA-BBB turn with DIFFERENT flight numbers later in the day, that would be be a change.

The gold standard is flight numbers and city pairs.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 05:04 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 607
Default

Thanks for the clarification and supporting information guys.
DeadStick is offline  
Old 02-25-2011, 06:57 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Singlecoil's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Supine
Posts: 251
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
Flight time would not have been an issue, you could have gone. The FAA example has a crew divert to an alternate, repo back to the planned destination and still depart for the last leg.

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/...2009/Banks.pdf


One thing they point out is you still have to be able to look back and find your rest. If you get 30 minutes after block in, for your 5th leg you'd have to be able to say at 19:30 that at 21:45 you could still look back and find 10 hours of rest.
I agree with this and the other opinion except that I think this poster meant to say look back and find 8 hours of rest. The rest period you would be starting uses actual flight time today and scheduled tomorrow in the calculation, but the look back rest period only uses scheduled flight time.
Singlecoil is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Time2Fly
Corporate
38
08-11-2010 09:17 PM
Gajre539
The Boneyard
0
07-19-2010 01:45 PM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM
colinflyin
Regional
10
03-13-2007 09:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices