Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Law
Commercial Pilot on biz card - holding out? >

Commercial Pilot on biz card - holding out?

Search
Notices
Aviation Law Legal issues, FARs, and questions

Commercial Pilot on biz card - holding out?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2011, 07:38 AM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Flight Test's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Position: Gettin' it certified
Posts: 38
Default

You'd never be able to get a job if being a commercial pilot was always a secret. :)
Flight Test is offline  
Old 12-08-2011, 05:48 AM
  #12  
A Second Past V1
 
Outlaw2097's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Assumed
Posts: 743
Default

If you have your CFI certs, put those first on the card. CFI implies you need a commercial certificate, but if you list it underneath then so be it.

At least thats how I do things.
Outlaw2097 is offline  
Old 12-08-2011, 12:43 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 787
Default

I've always wondered the same thing. A family friend is the head of the Farmingdale FISDO in NY. He say's its holding out. By giving someone a card that says your name and "commercial pilot" on it, its saying "I dont care where you have to go, or when you need to go, but I can fly you." Yet, if someone were to say "can you fly me from NY to BWI on Dec 8th in my plane" thats obviously private carriage (given a contract is made). In the normal non-aviation world, you dont need a contract to do business with someone. In the aviation world, you need a contract to carry out private carriage, a limited number of contracts nonetheless. In this case, a business card is like an informal contract offering your services, and if you have one, you probably have about a hundred more that are being handed out at the bar, family functions, what have you. Therefore, a business card is considered common carriage/holding out. Thats the way I see it..
That being said, using "i'm a commercial pilot" to pick up a chick at the bar, is that holding out?
sandrich is offline  
Old 12-08-2011, 12:55 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 165
Default

Thanks for the replies guys!

So I guess holding out isn't illegal unless your putting out, err, I mean have a legitimate contract to do business.

But if the act itself can get you in trouble (per the post above) then if you give someone your business card, you better hope he is ready to create a contract??!
sinkrate3278 is offline  
Old 12-08-2011, 04:13 PM
  #15  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by sandrich View Post
I've always wondered the same thing. A family friend is the head of the Farmingdale FISDO in NY. He say's its holding out. By giving someone a card that says your name and "commercial pilot" on it, its saying "I dont care where you have to go, or when you need to go, but I can fly you." Yet, if someone were to say "can you fly me from NY to BWI on Dec 8th in my plane" thats obviously private carriage (given a contract is made). In the normal non-aviation world, you dont need a contract to do business with someone. In the aviation world, you need a contract to carry out private carriage, a limited number of contracts nonetheless. In this case, a business card is like an informal contract offering your services, and if you have one, you probably have about a hundred more that are being handed out at the bar, family functions, what have you. Therefore, a business card is considered common carriage/holding out. Thats the way I see it..
That being said, using "i'm a commercial pilot" to pick up a chick at the bar, is that holding out?

If the customer owns the plane you don't need a contract and you can advertise or hold out all you want. Freelance corporate pilots do it all the time.

What you cannot do is provide the airplane (unless you have a 135 or 121 cert, or a specific sort of contractual arrangement).

Handing out a card that says you are commercial pilot does not imply that you are offering to provide a plane unless it says that on the card.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-09-2011, 06:01 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by sandrich View Post
I've always wondered the same thing. A family friend is the head of the Farmingdale FISDO in NY. He say's its holding out.?
FSDO inspectors are notorious for being incorrect. I was once in an investigatory meeting where the two inspectors investigating a possible violation disagreed on whether the the facts (which were not in dispute) was a violation or not.

Sure he's holding out. But a risk said, it's not necessarily holding out his availability for air transportation (aircraft + pilot).
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Old 12-09-2011, 07:58 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 165
Default

So in this case it would only be holding out if I advertise myself as a commercial pilot AND am able to provide an airplane (on my biz card)? Or it's holding out of more than several people call me up to fly THEIR airplanes after having given them my biz card (and I do it)?
sinkrate3278 is offline  
Old 12-09-2011, 04:55 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 787
Default

Originally Posted by mikearuba View Post
So in this case it would only be holding out if I advertise myself as a commercial pilot AND am able to provide an airplane (on my biz card)? Or it's holding out of more than several people call me up to fly THEIR airplanes after having given them my biz card (and I do it)?
Theres really no cut and dry way to explain it. Everyone has their own definitions. Instructors teach what they were taught. Their students practice what their instructors taught them. So its and ongoing circle of a theoretical game of telephone... FARs are notorious for loose interpretation, so that when a violation is questionable, the FAA can use that grey area in their favor. I'd say that the common carriage/holding out is one of the most in-the-air issues in commercial aviation. Let me go ahead and bust out my CFI thinking cap here...
Check out Advisory Circular 120-12A. It explains that "private carriers are sometimes referred to as contract carriers...and carriage is usually on a long term basis." The part that gets me is when it says private carriage is where THREE CONTRACTS is the basis of the operation, but 18-24 contracts is considered holding out....talk about one of those grey areas...That being said, the only reason to use a commercial pilot business card would be to promote business, which could be considered on par with putting your name in the yellow pages as a pilot (which is holding out). Like I said, this is my opinion, so take it for what its worth. My greatest advice would be to just call the FISDO and see what they say, because they're the ones who'd bust you if it happened to be a violation.
sandrich is offline  
Old 12-10-2011, 04:07 AM
  #19  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by mikearuba View Post
So in this case it would only be holding out if I advertise myself as a commercial pilot AND am able to provide an airplane (on my biz card)? Or it's holding out of more than several people call me up to fly THEIR airplanes after having given them my biz card (and I do it)?
You can fly for as many EMPLOYERS as you want...a different one every day of the year as long as THEY provide the airplane. That's what your CPL allows to do...get paid to fly someone else's airplane for them. No limitations on advertising or how many customers you have.

A CPL does NOT allow you to run an airline (121) or charter service (135) which are operations where YOU provide the airplane. You need an operating cert to do that.

That's it, very simple.

OK, so there is a grey area exception but it does nor affect 99.99% of pilots: You can hire yourself out AND provide the airplane to an employer in a "private carriage" situation. This is a strange one, but basically you need to have a PRIVATE, ongoing arrangement with one (or even several) customers to fly them around in your airplane. This is USUALLY characterized by a long-term written contract but even that is not required. What is required is that you are NOT available to the general public, but rather only to specific private parties. Any sort of advertising, frequent changes in customers, or too many customers all cross the line of common carriage. It can be a grey area because attempts to expand such a business can quickly lead down a slippery slope. But don't worry too much about this it is a very rare situation...but it does create a lot of confusion.

If you are a commercial pilot you can advertise your flying services all you want...just don't advertise or provide the airplane too.

And yes there are a lot of idiot CFI's and even some FSDO people with gross misconceptions about this.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-10-2011, 06:37 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 826
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
OK, so there is a grey area exception but it does nor affect 99.99% of pilots: You can hire yourself out AND provide the airplane to an employer in a "private carriage" situation. This is a strange one, but basically you need to have a PRIVATE, ongoing arrangement with one (or even several) customers to fly them around in your airplane. This is USUALLY characterized by a long-term written contract but even that is not required. What is required is that you are NOT available to the general public, but rather only to specific private parties. Any sort of advertising, frequent changes in customers, or too many customers all cross the line of common carriage. It can be a grey area because attempts to expand such a business can quickly lead down a slippery slope. But don't worry too much about this it is a very rare situation...but it does create a lot of confusion.
It does. It's doesn't help that there is such a thing as a Part 135 =private= carriage certificate and so far, I have not come across even one case in which the FAA has treated what appears to be "private carriage" as something in which an operating certificate was not required.
NoyGonnaDoIt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
CLewis
Part 135
5
07-11-2011 06:35 PM
ebuhoner
Flight Schools and Training
35
10-10-2009 09:02 AM
Herc130AV8R
Military
25
03-22-2008 05:22 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
34
07-31-2007 01:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices