Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh
(Post 2580864)
I would say the only real benefit of unmanned tacair is not risking the political fallout of a shootdown. Look at the latest Syrian strike - no one came close to penetrating their airspace. Why risk it when you can launch missiles or a wave of drones from over the horizon? I thought I heard that the next gen fighter was going to be optionally manned. I could be wrong there.
The priority for combat aircraft is winning against peer competitors. They can use MQ-9 if they need to bomb third-world ground formations and ensure none of our people get hurt.
Originally Posted by FlyGuy1986
(Post 2580801)
How are people going to feel when you can get them LA to Paris in an hour on an unmanned scramjet? Oh it's a fully configurable detachable cabin equipped with a ballistic escape system in case of any issues. Or you can sit with your knees in your chest for 14 hours on the current fleet of aircraft because it's got a pilot up front.
Originally Posted by FlyGuy1986
(Post 2580801)
Maybe Musk is going to bore tunnels across the US and link cities together with 700 mph mag lev trains running off green energy.
Kind of like going to the moon... we did that to beat the Ruskies. If Uncle Sugar is going to write the check, he'll need a darn good reason. If businesses are going to write the check, they'll need to be able to articulate technology readiness and an ROI timeline to the BoD.
Originally Posted by FlyGuy1986
(Post 2580801)
I don't know what the future is for airline travel. I do know we went from a powered kite with one dude laying on it to landing on the moon in 65 years. 20 years ago no one was thinking you would be walking around with a powerful computer in the palm of your hand that instantly connected you to the entire world. Something will come along to revolutionize travel. I'm not smart enough to know when and what form that will take.
The horse and buggy manufacturers never thought the automobile would catch on. Interesting conversation though. Frankly I'm a tad disappointed in the lack of progress in aerospace and space since I was a kid. I expected more by now. Politics and economics got in the way of cool whiz-bang new stuff. |
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2576611)
Ships do do this, they have harbor pilots that join the crew for docking the ship. They make the big bucks too, $400K is the average salary.
Huh? :confused: Putting a Pilot who has specific local knowledge of a harbor, aboard a ship when that ship is operating into or out of the harbor is nothing remotely like what's being proposed. |
Originally Posted by A Squared
(Post 2581063)
Huh? :confused: Putting a Pilot who has specific local knowledge of a harbor, aboard a ship when that ship is operating into or out of the harbor is nothing remotely like what's being proposed.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2581129)
With single pilot, they would put in a second pilot virtually, during high workloads. That may even not be necessary.
|
Originally Posted by Mesabah
(Post 2581129)
With single pilot, they would put in a second pilot virtually, during high workloads. That may even not be necessary.
|
Originally Posted by A Squared
(Post 2581131)
the pilots are put on board because they have specific knowledge of the channels, procedures, markings hazards and other local conditions of that particular location, that the crew of an oceangoing vessel wouldn't have, and couldn't be expected to have. The pilot isn't put on board because they are shorthanded by 1 person on the bridge.
They don't do it by remote control either, in fact they occasionally die getting on and off the ships. |
As long as Teslas keep hitting semi trucks and swerving into concrete barriers, our jobs are safe.
|
Wasn't NextGen and RNP introduced back in '96? Yet here we are, still getting vectored for a 20nm ILS in 2018.
Mgt: "How can we seamlessly enhance trafflic flow and improve our approach capabilities?" ATC/FAA/Pilots: "Spend money." Mgt: "Nevermind." Our airline has an RNP 0.1 approach to almost every airport we fly into. How often do we get to use them? Maybe 5% of the time because no one else can. |
Originally Posted by FlyingMaryJane
(Post 2576345)
Thats why there will NEVER BE A PILOT SHORTAGE!!
|
Originally Posted by RckyMtHigh
(Post 2580482)
The last generation of military fighter pilots has probably been born already. Mil is pushing unmanned cargo ops and the FAA has recently certified an optionally manned UH-1 helo. It's going to happen on the civilian side as well, it's just a matter of time. Guys in the business now are probably pretty safe, but the future of aviation is going to be vastly different from today. There might not even be much of a future of aviation. Why travel to Orlando when you can experience the sights, sounds, and feel of Disney in your own virtual reality world? Do you really need that widget from Amazon delivered when you can 3D print one at home?
My 5 year old said the other day he wanted to be a pilot (although he may have said pirate, I'm not too sure). I don't think he will retire 60 years from now after a career in manned aviation. There's better odds of him being a pirate than that happening. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands