Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Single pilot planes are coming. >

Single pilot planes are coming.

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Single pilot planes are coming.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2018, 12:47 PM
  #41  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
We won’t end up going from 2 pilots to 1 to zero. It will be directly from 2 to zero. There’s no advantage to single pilot, especially augmented with a remote system.
I totally disagree, self driving cars, and fully autonomous aircraft are orders of magnitude more complex than single pilot. As someone who programs in Pyton, and R for ML, the claim of autonomous items by manufacturers is dubious at best. However, Boeing really needs a gimmick for selling its new 797, or more importantly, a replacement 737 that can compete with Airbus. There will never be fully autonomous aircraft until AI progresses to biological systems, which isn't in our lifetimes.

This isn't about eliminating pilots, it's about streamlining the airspace system so a Machine learning assisted autopilot, can fly the aircraft direct to destination, without any separation criteria. Doppler Shift Lidar can actually see the wake from other aircraft. However, you still need someone in the cockpit to manage the system. The AI is essentially replacing ATC, not the aircraft operator. For safety's sake, aviate, navigate, communicate, will be reduced to just aviate.

We are already screwed with FAR 117, because once the FAA approves single pilot, even if the PWA requires 2 pilots, one of the pilot's duty periods, doesn't count against the FAR limits. How long will that contract item last, when the company is putting pilots on trips with 18+ hour deadhead days? This is already happening now, it happened to me.

Last edited by Mesabah; 04-21-2018 at 01:09 PM.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 04-21-2018, 08:04 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 123
Default

Neither the Starship Enterprise nor the Millennium Falcon were single pilot or autonomous. Could a computer complete the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs?
Amike is offline  
Old 04-21-2018, 09:18 PM
  #43  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,289
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
We won’t end up going from 2 pilots to 1 to zero. It will be directly from 2 to zero. There’s no advantage to single pilot, especially augmented with a remote system.
This may not be far off the mark. You can't go single pilot until the automation can *reliably* handle the 6-8 pilot incapacitations which occur in the US each year. That means full-auto needs to be ready for prime-time before you go single pilot on pax airliners.

But there will be a single pilot during the transition, that will last some number of years until they demonstrate the reliability of the automation. My guess is a few years to find some bugs, then twenty more to rinse, wash, repeat a few times. It will end up taking decades longer than anticipated, and somebody will likely go bankrupt (or get bailed out by the government, either or).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-21-2018, 11:12 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
The FAA has been working on CPDLC for 15+ years and you don't see yet in domestic airspace. By the time they're ready for pilotless aircraft we'll be using Star Trek transporters.
I agree, the FAA doesn't move fast and airlines still fly planes developed in the 60's. I don't think being a pilot is anymore at risk than any other job of disappearing. AI will eventually be able to write software, robots will be able to clean/cook, AI will fight wars and machines will build houses. And someday the end of the world will also come and humans will live on other planets.
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 04-22-2018, 08:16 AM
  #45  
Number Last
 
PowderFinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku View Post
I agree, the FAA doesn't move fast and airlines still fly planes developed in the 60's. I don't think being a pilot is anymore at risk than any other job of disappearing. AI will eventually be able to write software, robots will be able to clean/cook, AI will fight wars and machines will build houses. And someday the end of the world will also come and humans will live on other planets.
Maybe we should start with an AI Flight Attendant (I know, that's an oxymoron) and see how that works out.
PowderFinger is offline  
Old 04-22-2018, 10:44 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Karnak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 852
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver View Post
Ah it’s been a month, cue the “omg robots are taking over our jobs” post.
I for one welcome our robot overlords!

"This is horrible!"
"Unsafe!"
"We'll fight them in the streets!"
"Over my dead body!"

"Wait. They'll pay me $500 an hour to take over in case of lost link? Um...ok.
"
Karnak is offline  
Old 04-22-2018, 10:51 AM
  #47  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
This may not be far off the mark. You can't go single pilot until the automation can *reliably* handle the 6-8 pilot incapacitations which occur in the US each year. That means full-auto needs to be ready for prime-time before you go single pilot on pax airliners.
One thing Machine learning can do extremely well is determine if the pilot is incapacitated, and alert the company. This isn't really an issue because the ground, in conjunction with an FA, could take over. It would simply become a priority aircraft. 100% of the problem is the interaction of an AI aircraft with a conventional one. For instance, if a non AI aircraft next to you on a parallel approach overshoots the approach path, the AI will freak out. There is no way to solve this problem without banning all non AI aircraft. That is why you still need at least one pilot - for when the AI does something dumb, which will be a lot.



This is the same for if all cars were AI, and the roadways were 100% clear of all obstructions, we would already have self driving cars.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 04-22-2018, 11:54 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bizzlepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: Swimming, or drowning, depends on the day.
Posts: 106
Default

Having first hand knowledge/experience of how RPAs are operating both in the overseas and stateside training environments I don't see pilotless aircraft in my lifetime. Maybe my son's lifetime, but definitely not mine. RPA's were supposed to be cleared to fly in the NAS with no chase aircraft by 2015. The FAA is still dragging their feet on it. It'll be years if not decades before things get ironed out for cargo/pax carrying RPA's.
bizzlepilot is offline  
Old 04-22-2018, 11:58 AM
  #49  
Number Last
 
PowderFinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by Karnak View Post
I for one welcome our robot overlords!

"This is horrible!"
"Unsafe!"
"We'll fight them in the streets!"
"Over my dead body!"

"Wait. They'll pay me $500 an hour to take over in case of lost link? Um...ok.
"
Hummm... Might be time to get that Remote Pilot certificate ...
PowderFinger is offline  
Old 04-22-2018, 02:37 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Default

I chuckle at all this y’all of pilotless planes-every time I see the 15 guys it takes to load and service my plane every leg.

Much less complicated work than what we do.....
jcountry is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Major
4
11-19-2008 02:22 PM
SkyHigh
Major
109
04-12-2006 09:00 AM
Was That For Us?
Major
0
10-20-2005 09:55 PM
Sir James
Major
1
10-09-2005 06:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices