Search

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

It is coming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-27-2020 | 09:50 AM
  #1  
3pointlanding's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Default It is coming

They say it will not happen in the near future. It may not be tomorrow but the industry is changing and changing faster then I would have imagined. Read onhttps://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/...er-experiment/
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 09:52 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Default

Hackers wet dream!!!
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 10:12 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Default

Are they gonna build a robot to carry the briefcase full of cash to pay the “landing fees” in Burkina Faso?
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
TheFly's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 0
From: Seat 0B
Default

https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/h...f-landing.html
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 12:58 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

Lawsuit reduction.

I know the Atlas pilot family is suing Atlas and Amazon and others for a whole host of claims.

If it's always going to be the mfg's fault, they might as well automate it, then they can at least control it. I think Boeing is likely to make a HUGE push into automation as well after the Max disaster (ie don't assume person in loop is a reliable safety factor especially on low time overseas pilots with poor local MX - yes, a bad design as well). Amazon has to be on board after Atlas and the claims against them from that crash.

Cargo would be a reasonable place to start this, though I would have expected somewhere overseas.

Going to take a while, but will happen. A few more Atlas pilots hiding their work histories, crashing, then suing their company and plane manufacturer and customers may help it move along more quickly.

Amazon is getting slammed for overworking and mistreating their ABX pilots as well. Automation has to be a wet dream for them.
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 02:19 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dynap09
Lawsuit reduction.

I know the Atlas pilot family is suing Atlas and Amazon and others for a whole host of claims.

If it's always going to be the mfg's fault, they might as well automate it, then they can at least control it. I think Boeing is likely to make a HUGE push into automation as well after the Max disaster (ie don't assume person in loop is a reliable safety factor especially on low time overseas pilots with poor local MX - yes, a bad design as well). Amazon has to be on board after Atlas and the claims against them from that crash.

Cargo would be a reasonable place to start this, though I would have expected somewhere overseas.

Going to take a while, but will happen. A few more Atlas pilots hiding their work histories, crashing, then suing their company and plane manufacturer and customers may help it move along more quickly.

Amazon is getting slammed for overworking and mistreating their ABX pilots as well. Automation has to be a wet dream for them.
Just how is Amazon getting “slammed” exactly?
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 04:07 PM
  #7  
Vito's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 713
Likes: 17
From: 757/767 Capt
Default

Half of the US population is afraid to walk outside their door without a mask on. People drive alone in their cars with masks and gloves on. I’m sure these same folks will be waiting on line to fly in a pilotless plane! Cargo may seem like a likely start until one week after ops commence and a plane gets lost, or crashes. Not worried.
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
The Duke's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Sort of a contrarian view point, but I think this sort of technology might be seen at the pax carriers more than freight, at least initially. Freight pilots are a much smaller cost unit relative to pilots at the pax carriers, where there are many more pilots on payroll. There’s a reason the first prototype, the A350, has windows.
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 05:02 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by The Duke
Sort of a contrarian view point, but I think this sort of technology might be seen at the pax carriers more than freight, at least initially. Freight pilots are a much smaller cost unit relative to pilots at the pax carriers, where there are many more pilots on payroll. There’s a reason the first prototype, the A350, has windows.

Yeah...because it’s an A350.....it would cost more to change the manufacturing process to no window cutouts. Just saying
Reply
Old 07-27-2020 | 05:30 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by The Duke
Sort of a contrarian view point, but I think this sort of technology might be seen at the pax carriers more than freight, at least initially. Freight pilots are a much smaller cost unit relative to pilots at the pax carriers, where there are many more pilots on payroll. There’s a reason the first prototype, the A350, has windows.
That’s an interesting point. Labor is a bigger unit cost for pax carriers but it’s the freight haulers with the cash flow for the cap ex.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rudder
Cargo
16
01-29-2011 03:04 PM
Rightseat Ballast
Regional
13
01-16-2010 02:56 PM
Whacker77
Regional
20
08-05-2009 09:01 PM
Herbie
Regional
30
07-05-2009 08:56 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
08-09-2005 12:32 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices