Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Google and the removal of the pilot. >

Google and the removal of the pilot.

Search
Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Google and the removal of the pilot.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2021, 10:27 AM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Position: 320
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by CleCapt View Post
The discussion was about moving people. In that context, it will not happen in my lifetime, and I'm no where near retirement.

For all the reasons mentioned in this post, no matter what the price of the ticket, people will not get on a pilotless plane, passengers are not that stupid. Consider the variables that may or may not exist on current drones. Snow storms, Slick taxi ways, slick high speed turn offs, short runways (SNA,LGA,DCA) Deicing, and the thousands of variables that pilots take into consideration every day.

We agree to disagree.

That's probably what the guy that drove the elevator back in the day said, as well as the trolley driver. How many of our customers blindly get on a train/people mover at the airport and don't give a crap that there is no one driving it? (LAS/EWR/TPA just to name a few examples)

Once they figure out that you can control a few large cargo transports across the ocean with a few guys in a trailer park, how long will Jeff Bezos wait? That's definitely cheaper than paying a few thousand freight dogs.

Cargo will fall first, while 121 drops its crew requirement down to 1 pilot because of the 'shortage' we will experience. Think about it. Before a worldwide pandemic even ended, two idiots decided now would be a great time to start another domestic airline. One even tried to get free labor by announcing flight attendants would only be for college interns.

The point of the article is that technology is coming for your job. You can ignore it, invest in it, or call your congressman. Telling me that we disagree is just winding the clock.
Rawhide51 is offline  
Old 05-30-2021, 11:48 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 103
Default

I have 15 years left. While I believe that someday we will see autonomous airliners, I believe it will take longer to get there than many people think.
Maybe, just maybe I'll see single pilot cargo in my career. Will the tech be available? Sure. Will it make it through the approval process in the next 15-20 years? I doubt it.
Worth less than $.02
CANEWT is offline  
Old 05-30-2021, 02:59 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by Fr8Thrust;[url=tel:3242912
3242912[/url]]or works for another airline. Not every passenger airline asks this of their pilots.
We don’t do it, however I’ve flown with two who wore it the whole time.
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Old 05-30-2021, 03:03 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Grumpyaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,030
Default

Originally Posted by KonaJoe;[url=tel:3242294
3242294[/url]]Insurance companies will be a bigger limiting factor than anything else.
Agreed, they already control trucking company policies. Automatic transmissions, formal training or two years experience, in-cab cameras, sway sensors, speed governors, electronic logs, etc. If you waive these policies rates skyrocket.
Grumpyaviator is offline  
Old 05-30-2021, 06:24 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dave Fitzgerald's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2012
Position: 777
Posts: 2,158
Default

Pilotless planes won't happen for a very long time. It will come down to cost. A pilot will be cheaper than designing in sufficient system redundancy for pilotless planes. It will also be heavier, all those systems, a pilot, relatively speaking is pretty light.

All that tech comes at a cost, and at least for the forseable future, pilots will be cheaper. IF one tries, you also have to account for the additional certification costs that the FAA will certainly require.

I don't believe you can efficiently retrofit a current design, so it will have to be a clean sheet design with all the systems integrated. Boeing can't get a new design done in less than 15 years now. How long do you think it will take the FAA to come up with regulations to cover a commercial-passenger clean sheet design?
Dave Fitzgerald is offline  
Old 05-31-2021, 07:24 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Originally Posted by Allegheny View Post
After retiring from the airlines, and after spending 10 years on the Bus, I got rated in the King Air 300. I had flown an earlier version King Air in the early 1980's. The truly sad thing is how much alike they were. 12 anti / deicing switches, a B-29 pressurization controller that required technique to operate properly. A Byzantine electrical system with current limiters, hall effect devices, and an overall weird buss configuration.
I blame Southwest!
Larry in TN is offline  
Old 05-31-2021, 08:17 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Guppy.
Posts: 285
Default

Originally Posted by Larry in TN View Post
I blame Southwest!
If Southwest were entirely responsible for the perpetual production of the 737, it would have a built in mechanism for the pilots to keep their clothes on.
KonaJoe is offline  
Old 05-31-2021, 06:32 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F15andMD11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: 787 FO
Posts: 792
Default

Comparing automated light rail or other fixed track systems with remotely piloted aircraft is not even a valid comparison.
Just one mishap where passengers are fatally injured and trust in the system will crumble.
How would that Quantas A380 have faired if it were remotely piloted? My knowledge of the incident is that it took all three pilots, each working separate critical action items, to save that plane. I don’t see it happening anytime in near future.
F15andMD11 is online now  
Old 06-01-2021, 04:49 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Default

Originally Posted by F15andMD11 View Post
Comparing automated light rail or other fixed track systems with remotely piloted aircraft is not even a valid comparison.
Just one mishap where passengers are fatally injured and trust in the system will crumble.
How would that Quantas A380 have faired if it were remotely piloted? My knowledge of the incident is that it took all three pilots, each working separate critical action items, to save that plane. I don’t see it happening anytime in near future.
Well the good news is, if a remotely “piloted” aircraft goes down the pilot will be unharmed.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 06-01-2021, 06:16 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ReadOnly7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,327
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
Well the good news is, if a remotely “piloted” aircraft goes down the pilot will be unharmed.
it will still somehow be reported as “pilot error”
ReadOnly7 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices