Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Aviation Technology (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/aviation-technology/)
-   -   Climategate (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/aviation-technology/46113-climategate.html)

Mesabah 08-26-2018 04:25 AM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2662005)
Not for coal? I don’t see how we plan for n powering the world without burning coal. Tell that to the Chinese. We need it all. Solar? Sure. There’s NO reason why there shouldn’t be solar panels on the roof of every house in parts of America. More nuke’ler as well... but not in my backyard...

Coal is clean. Look at our emissions in this country. Our air is cleaner than ever. Fly into LA lately? You’d never see the ground 30 years ago, the smog was soooo bad.

You greenhadis want to outlaw everything that works and only allow green energy which can’t do it. Germany and Spain have put such a burden on their people by having the highest rates for energy in the world.

I’m not against green energy... only if it works. Carbon taxation is a joke and only will strip away massive gdp from the world.... all for a minuscule amount of temp “savings”.

One of the best things Trump has done is to get us out of the bs Paris Accords where the US basically had to make reparations of 3 billion dollars to the third world... no wonder they were so for it while belching out unregulated dirty coal plants...

Come on olive oil. Waiting for your grand plan with proof of concept.

https://www.nuscalepower.com/
https://flibe-energy.com/
I would never live near an old design(gen 3 and below) reactor, I would have absolutely no problem living near these.

Tailhookah 08-26-2018 04:55 AM

No way I’d live near a nuke plant. But if it’s safe nuclear then I’d do it.

Mesabah 08-26-2018 05:25 AM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2662223)
No way I’d live near a nuke plant. But if it’s safe nuclear then I’d do it.


Tailhookah 08-26-2018 01:35 PM

Backyard nukes will never fly. Order one. Dig it up. Then some jihadi or liberal will blow it up and use it for a dirty bomb. Yeah... never see small nukes. Ever. Thanks to terrorism.

If the Fukushima plant melted all the way could we call it the Miami Syndrome?...

Sounds great. All for it. If a computer guy says it’s safe then let’s go. Put em everywhere. Use that depleted uranium up from the Cold War and A10 rounds. Sounds perfect. I also heard that 3 mile island and Fukushima were safe also... oh don’t forget Chernobyl. That was also safe.

Not a big fan of nuk’ler. Cause when it goes wrong...it’s really bad and ruins big parts of ma nature for eons.

Glenntilton 08-26-2018 03:39 PM


Originally Posted by Glenntilton (Post 2658470)

Any responses too this?

Tailhookah 08-26-2018 04:22 PM

LWC is awesome. Good clip. Now you know the libhadis won’t like it. BTW... Crowder and Dr P.M. are both Canucks. Both are awesome. And both tell the truth. Not defend some bs witchcraft false narrative that AGW pushes.

Mesabah 08-27-2018 05:22 AM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2662480)
Backyard nukes will never fly. Order one. Dig it up. Then some jihadi or liberal will blow it up and use it for a dirty bomb. Yeah... never see small nukes. Ever. Thanks to terrorism.

If the Fukushima plant melted all the way could we call it the Miami Syndrome?...

Sounds great. All for it. If a computer guy says it’s safe then let’s go. Put em everywhere. Use that depleted uranium up from the Cold War and A10 rounds. Sounds perfect. I also heard that 3 mile island and Fukushima were safe also... oh don’t forget Chernobyl. That was also safe.

Not a big fan of nuk’ler. Cause when it goes wrong...it’s really bad and ruins big parts of ma nature for eons.

Coal causes significantly more cancer, radioactive waste to be ejected into the atmosphere. Coal has to go away.

Flytolive 08-27-2018 05:43 AM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2662230)

Now that is very compelling from a spokesperson who has credibility across the political spectrum. I look forward to learning more about it. Thanks for sharing.

Mesabah 08-27-2018 09:47 AM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2662480)
Backyard nukes will never fly. Order one. Dig it up. Then some jihadi or liberal will blow it up and use it for a dirty bomb. Yeah... never see small nukes. Ever. Thanks to terrorism.

If the Fukushima plant melted all the way could we call it the Miami Syndrome?...

Sounds great. All for it. If a computer guy says it’s safe then let’s go. Put em everywhere. Use that depleted uranium up from the Cold War and A10 rounds. Sounds perfect. I also heard that 3 mile island and Fukushima were safe also... oh don’t forget Chernobyl. That was also safe.

Not a big fan of nuk’ler. Cause when it goes wrong...it’s really bad and ruins big parts of ma nature for eons.

When was the last time you saw someone steal a small nuclear reactor from a parked aircraft carrier? Or steal any nuclear material from US stockpiles for that matter?

Tailhookah 08-27-2018 02:40 PM


When was the last time you saw someone steal a small nuclear reactor from a parked aircraft carrier? Or steal any nuclear material from US stockpiles for that matter?
Because they are well guarded.

Tailhookah 08-29-2018 04:29 PM

More.... still waiting for olive to post anything.

https://business.financialpost.com/o...95c9a-36409661

Mesabah 08-29-2018 04:58 PM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2664583)
More.... still waiting for olive to post anything.

https://business.financialpost.com/o...95c9a-36409661

So what, coal is still a direct killer of humans, regardless of climate change. We need to move on from political BS, and move to actual engineering solutions.




Flytolive 09-07-2018 11:43 PM


Originally Posted by Tailhookah (Post 2660845)
We currently are much colder and at lower levels of CO2 than Earth has seen for a very long time.

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018...y=90&auto=webp


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/07/c...gtype=Homepage

Fdxlag2 09-08-2018 03:52 AM

You manufacture an island that everyone tells you will sink. It sinks because not enough people buy coal powered priuses genius.

Mesabah 09-08-2018 05:08 AM

Like I said earlier in the thread, waste heat from IV Gen nuclear power can be used to extract greenhouse gases directly out of the atmosphere. If the anti-nuclear people would change their minds, then climate change is no longer a thing.

tomgoodman 09-08-2018 07:20 AM


Originally Posted by Fdxlag2 (Post 2670532)
You manufacture an island that everyone tells you will sink. It sinks because not enough people buy coal powered priuses genius.

It has already sunk 38 feet. We’re gonna need a bigger Prius. :p

https://www.airspacemag.com/flight-t...ort-180968985/

Flytolive 09-08-2018 09:18 AM


Originally Posted by Fdxlag2 (Post 2670532)
You manufacture an island that everyone tells you will sink.

Is Miami sinking?

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...e-of-miami/amp


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2670557)
Like I said earlier in the thread, waste heat from IV Gen nuclear power can be used to extract greenhouse gases directly out of the atmosphere. If the anti-nuclear people would change their minds, then climate change is no longer a thing.

If is as good as Bill Gates, Michael Shellenberger and you say count me in. The Republicans control all the levers of power so it should be a done deal, right?

Fdxlag2 09-08-2018 09:48 AM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2670657)

Florida population 1910 750,000; Florida population 2010 19,000,000. Think any of those 18,000,000 extra people built houses on landed that would be considered flood prone in 1910? Not sure what it has to do with the sinking Osaka airport that you wanted to discuss.

tomgoodman 09-08-2018 07:47 PM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2670657)
Is Miami sinking?

Yes it is, but Florida officials have conspired to ... HIDE THE DECLINE! :D

Adlerdriver 09-08-2018 08:11 PM


Originally Posted by Fdxlag2 (Post 2670667)
Florida population 1910 750,000; Florida population 2010 19,000,000. Think any of those 18,000,000 extra people built houses on landed that would be considered flood prone in 1910? Not sure what it has to do with the sinking Osaka airport that you wanted to discuss.

It’s more the weight of almost 19M extra people, their houses and stuff. Since FL isn’t an island it won’t totally sink or capsize like Guam but probably bend down at the end by Miami and possibly go under. :rolleyes:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mnk0tIqsbYM

badflaps 09-08-2018 08:59 PM


Originally Posted by Adlerdriver (Post 2670882)
It’s more the weight of almost 19M extra people, their houses and stuff. Since FL isn’t an island it won’t totally sink or capsize like Guam but probably bend down at the end by Miami and possibly go under. :rolleyes:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mnk0tIqsbYM

They need a bunch of them Kapok trees.

ItnStln 09-09-2018 08:29 AM


Originally Posted by Adlerdriver (Post 2670882)
It’s more the weight of almost 19M extra people, their houses and stuff. Since FL isn’t an island it won’t totally sink or capsize like Guam but probably bend down at the end by Miami and possibly go under. :rolleyes:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mnk0tIqsbYM

Every time I see that video I wonder how he ever got elected.

Flytolive 09-09-2018 09:49 AM


Originally Posted by ItnStln (Post 2671009)
Every time I see that video I wonder how he ever got elected.

Almost as stupid as the flat-earthers who deny climate change. Mirrors anyone?

ItnStln 09-09-2018 09:51 AM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2671033)
Almost as stupid as the flat-earthers who deny climate change. Mirrors anyone?

No, it’s even worse than what you state.

Fdxlag2 09-09-2018 11:57 AM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2671033)
Almost as stupid as the flat-earthers who deny climate change. Mirrors anyone?

Friday it was sunny and hot. Today it is chilly and raining. Damn that CO2.

tomgoodman 09-09-2018 01:08 PM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2671033)
Almost as stupid as the flat-earthers who deny climate change. Mirrors anyone?

Weighted down by name-calling, your arguments have sunk like Kansai Airport. Fortunately for the environmentalist cause, spokespersons with better manners are available. :rolleyes:

Adlerdriver 09-09-2018 01:43 PM


Originally Posted by Fdxlag2 (Post 2671099)
Friday it was sunny and hot. Today it is chilly and raining. Damn that CO2.

If we just do all the green stuff, pay our carbon credits and whatever else the hand wringers come up with I’m sure it will cool right down.....er warm right up?.....be like so-Cal everyday?
Whatever we want the global climate to do.... we are completely capable of changing it in whatever way we want. Ice caps melting? Yeah, we can totally stop that. :rolleyes:

Flytolive 09-09-2018 06:59 PM


Originally Posted by tomgoodman (Post 2671128)
Weighted down by name-calling, your arguments have sunk like Kansai Airport.

They are not my arguments. They are those of the overwhelming scientific consensus not to mention common sense. As for your posts I can't recall any that have added much to this or any other APC discussion. Not exactly a "man in the arena."

Obvious and nonsensical BS deserves to called what it is.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

Mesabah 09-10-2018 05:24 AM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2670657)
If is as good as Bill Gates, Michael Shellenberger and you say count me in. The Republicans control all the levers of power so it should be a done deal, right?

Bush opened it up to the free market to decide. However, there is no future for nuclear if wind and solar are a large part of the power grid. In fact, most countries will be increasing their coal burning reliance with solar and wind. FWIW, the Trump tax cuts are the only thing that kept the Vogtle 3/4 project from going Tango Uniform.

Flytolive 09-10-2018 05:52 AM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2671341)
However, there is no future for nuclear if wind and solar are a large part of the power grid. In fact, most countries will be increasing their coal burning reliance with solar and wind.

You'll have to explain that because it doesn't appear on its face to make any sense at all.



Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2671341)
FWIW, the Trump tax cuts are the only thing that kept the Vogtle 3/4 project from going Tango Uniform.

Hardly a ringing endorsement much less support for nuclear.

Fdxlag2 09-10-2018 05:58 AM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2671354)
You'll have to explain that because it doesn't appear on its face to make any sense at all.


Hardly a ringing endorsement much less support for nuclear.

Go back to your capacity charts. Wind and solar work but you need to generate some electricity when it is night and the wind isn’t blowing. Thus despite all of the new solar and wind capability coal capacity remains relatively stable. Nuclear is too expensive to compete with coal part time. Besides that solar and wind suck up all of the subsidy dollars. Try thinking not channeling algore.

Mesabah 09-10-2018 06:46 AM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2671354)
You'll have to explain that because it doesn't appear on its face to make any sense at all.

Sure, I can explain it to you in my best layman's terms. The power you get to your house is kept within certain parameters. Baseload power plants, i.e. coal, gas, nuclear, hydro, can maintain these parameters through gearing and throttling of the generator turbine. Explained in this video:



Testing this process is what led to Chernobyl blowing up. Anyways, Solar and wind are additional power sources, when they are available(wind blowing, sun shining)They can be added to the grid for excess power. However, this constant flux of power capacity creates price instability in the market. With the expense of Nuclear, these plants can not survive in a market of fluctuating prices. Only cheap coal/gas can be used for baseload in a solar/wind market.

Mesabah 09-10-2018 07:32 AM

Also, Bill Gates reactor, runs the turbine on the Brayton cycle, whereas, coal, gas, current nuclear are on the Rankine cycle. Brayton being ~60% efficiency vs Rankine's ~45%.

Flytolive 09-10-2018 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2671381)
However, this constant flux of power capacity creates price instability in the market. With the expense of Nuclear, these plants can not survive in a market of fluctuating prices.

I appreciate the effort, but your argument still doesn't make sense. Markets including energy fluctuate all the time. Products' reliability and consistency are always part of pricing. Markets do a lousy job of accounting for negative economic externalities and new and not so new technologies including energy depend/benefit from government subsidies/support. You make a good case for the potential of nuclear, but don't seem to want to acknowledge its challenges while being anxious to do so for other clean technologies.

Mesabah 09-10-2018 08:41 AM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2671418)
I appreciate the effort, but your argument still doesn't make sense. Markets including energy fluctuate all the time. Products' reliability and consistency are always part of pricing. Markets do a lousy job of accounting for negative economic externalities and new and not so new technologies including energy depend/benefit from government subsidies/support. You make a good case for the potential of nuclear, but don't seem to want to acknowledge its challenges while being anxious to do so for other clean technologies.

Solar and wind are scams, if it were simply free market, we would only have coal and gas. The engineering world is telling you, if you want clean energy you need the government to run almost all nuclear, with some hydro where locations permit, in a not free market. The challenges of nuclear are nothing compared to the scam of wind and solar.

There obviously is nothing I can say that will convince you that the left is running a green energy scam. However, we in the first world, exported our emissions to third world countries, we then promised billions to clean up our mess, but the money never arrived. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/09/w...l-warming.html
Instead it was funneled into the bank accounts of left wing venture capitalist firms, and to people who own them like Al Gore. The left then blames Trump, and the right for everything they did.

Flytolive 09-10-2018 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2671460)
Solar and wind are scams, if it were simply free market, we would only have coal and gas. The engineering world is telling you, if you want clean energy you need the government to run almost all nuclear, with some hydro where locations permit, in a not free market. The challenges of nuclear are nothing compared to the scam of wind and solar.

Complete double standard from an engineer's perspective. If only the world was that simple.


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2671460)
The left then blames Trump, and the right for everything they did.

Stop projecting. The Republicans have all the levers of power. Make nuclear happen if the Dems were the problem.

ItnStln 09-10-2018 02:02 PM


Originally Posted by tomgoodman (Post 2671128)
Weighted down by name-calling, your arguments have sunk like Kansai Airport. Fortunately for the environmentalist cause, spokespersons with better manners are available. :rolleyes:

That’s what their party does, insult those who have other opinions.

ItnStln 09-10-2018 02:03 PM


Originally Posted by Flytolive (Post 2671257)
They are not my arguments. They are those of the overwhelming scientific consensus not to mention common sense. As for your posts I can't recall any that have added much to this or any other APC discussion. Not exactly a "man in the arena."

Obvious and nonsensical BS deserves to called what it is.

https://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

I have some carbon credits I’ll sell you if you’re that concerned.

Glenntilton 09-10-2018 03:02 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2671460)
Solar and wind are scams, if it were simply free market, we would only have coal and gas. The engineering world is telling you, if you want clean energy you need the government to run almost all nuclear, with some hydro where locations permit, in a not free market. The challenges of nuclear are nothing compared to the scam of wind and solar.

There obviously is nothing I can say that will convince you that the left is running a green energy scam. However, we in the first world, exported our emissions to third world countries, we then promised billions to clean up our mess, but the money never arrived. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/09/w...l-warming.html
Instead it was funneled into the bank accounts of left wing venture capitalist firms, and to people who own them like Al Gore. The left then blames Trump, and the right for everything they did.

This about sums it up.

ItnStln 09-10-2018 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 2671460)
Solar and wind are scams, if it were simply free market, we would only have coal and gas. The engineering world is telling you, if you want clean energy you need the government to run almost all nuclear, with some hydro where locations permit, in a not free market. The challenges of nuclear are nothing compared to the scam of wind and solar.

There obviously is nothing I can say that will convince you that the left is running a green energy scam. However, we in the first world, exported our emissions to third world countries, we then promised billions to clean up our mess, but the money never arrived. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/09/w...l-warming.html
Instead it was funneled into the bank accounts of left wing venture capitalist firms, and to people who own them like Al Gore. The left then blames Trump, and the right for everything they did.

Well said!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands