Search

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Climategate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2011 | 06:07 AM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Another brick in the wall, deniers of the world unite:

Himalayan glaciers not melting because of climate change, report finds - Telegraph
Reply
Old 01-28-2011 | 06:51 AM
  #182  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 71
From: Legacy FO
Default

Once again, we are again breaking snowfall records with the 2010-2011 winter season. I know I know, it's all due to Global Warming.

Record snow again buries Northeast - Yahoo! Malaysia News

UPDATE: Records beginning to fall with 2010-11 snow | mycentraljersey.com | MyCentralJersey.com

Syracuse area reaches average season's snowfall, with seven weeks of winter left | syracuse.com
Reply
Old 04-04-2011 | 04:42 AM
  #183  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: electron wrangler
Default Re: Climategate

The Truth, Still Inconvenient
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Just a few weeks ago Anthony Watts, who runs a prominent climate denialist Web site, praised the Berkeley project and piously declared himself “prepared to accept whatever result they produce, even if it proves my premise wrong.” But never mind: once he knew that Professor Muller was going to present those preliminary results, Mr. Watts dismissed the hearing as “post normal science political theater.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/04/op...nes&emc=tha212
Reply
Old 07-30-2018 | 06:01 PM
  #184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skidmark
Look before the thread gets closed or I get violated for religion talk. This climate gate thing is just a great example that scientists are people, like politions because they made a mistake, or they have a different agenda. Don't believe them just because they are scientists. No matter what the subject.
Guess you were obviously wrong and not the scientists. Becoming kind of a theme with you.

Reply
Old 07-30-2018 | 08:41 PM
  #185  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,758
Likes: 74
Default

Any time I hear someone start barking about denying global warming, I can reliably count on them to be a few bricks shy of a full load, hold a healthy share of internal redneck, and I think less of them. A lot less.

Yes, some winters are more intense, some summers more intense, and fire seasons get longer and more severe, but the larger picture, irrefutably backed by science, notes a continuing trend which is not cyclical, but due to human intervention and poor environmental stewardship. There is zero question of that, and to deny it, much like the ostrich with head below ground, is idiotic, ignorant, and short sighted. Very, very short sighted.
Reply
Old 07-31-2018 | 07:04 AM
  #186  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,184
Likes: 807
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke
Any time I hear someone start barking about denying global warming, I can reliably count on them to be a few bricks shy of a full load, hold a healthy share of internal redneck, and I think less of them. A lot less.

Yes, some winters are more intense, some summers more intense, and fire seasons get longer and more severe, but the larger picture, irrefutably backed by science, notes a continuing trend which is not cyclical, but due to human intervention and poor environmental stewardship. There is zero question of that, and to deny it, much like the ostrich with head below ground, is idiotic, ignorant, and short sighted. Very, very short sighted.
Yeah, I reserved judgement for a very long time, in part because I have many older relatives and family friends in science academia and they were very outspoken about the gross departures from established protocol on the part of many climate science types (weak science, biased documentation, outright data manipulation, rush to embrace political positions, etc).

They probably would have made more progress faster if they hadn't pushed the boundaries so hard and rushed to promote their ideas, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. I've even been involved in DoD climate change mitigation planning. It's happening.
Reply
Old 07-31-2018 | 07:17 AM
  #187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
They probably would have made more progress faster if they hadn't pushed the boundaries so hard and rushed to promote their ideas, but even a broken clock is right twice a day.
BS. They were confronted with a well-financed (fossil fuel industry) opposition PR campaign that lied, obfuscated and misled the usual non-reality based audience. Same folks that claimed cigarettes didn't cause cancer.
Reply
Old 07-31-2018 | 08:20 AM
  #188  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

The only good thing about resurrecting this 7 year old thread is that new readers will be exposed to the wit and wisdom of our late friend, Jungle.
Reply
Old 07-31-2018 | 09:09 AM
  #189  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,184
Likes: 807
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Flytolive
BS. They were confronted with a well-financed (fossil fuel industry) opposition PR campaign that lied, obfuscated and misled the usual non-reality based audience. Same folks that claimed cigarettes didn't cause cancer.
Yes that was of course to be expected, whether the science was right or wrong. Doesn't justify resorting to the same tactics.

Too many scientists abandoned accepted principles, destroying their own and others credibility, setting back their own cause. Like I said I'm not getting this from anyone's PR, this is from friends and close relatives (I have many in academia, all hard science types).
Reply
Old 07-31-2018 | 10:09 AM
  #190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
whether the science was right or wrong.
The science is and was correct. Big Oil has spent lots of money trying to convince people that 2 + 2 = 5 just like Big Tobacco did. Al Gore was right.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices