Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Career Questions (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/career-questions/)
-   -   Race and gender in hiring practices. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/career-questions/121767-race-gender-hiring-practices.html)

OOfff 05-23-2019 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2824965)
White men are not necessarily disadvantaged.

People from lower socio-economic classes are disadvantaged: due to lack of exposure to aviation at an early age, as well as lack of role models, motivation sources and ... well, money.

To change the filter and muddy the waters by substituting race for economic status in the analysis is a travesty.

I’d bet that, even controlling for socioeconomic status, we wouldn’t have a huge hiring preference for non-white and non-male pilots.

That doesn’t seem to stop people here from complaining about how easy minorities have it in aviation or that they are “displacing” people who should have the job instead.

GogglesPisano 05-23-2019 08:42 AM


Originally Posted by OOfff (Post 2825003)
I’d bet that, even controlling for socioeconomic status, we wouldn’t have a huge hiring preference for non-white and non-male pilots.

You'd "bet that." Because you just have a feeling?

It looks like anecdotes work on both sides of this argument.

2StgTurbine 05-23-2019 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2825004)
You'd "bet that." Because you just have a feeling?

It looks like anecdotes work on both sides of this argument.

We already have the numbers. Just look at your seniority list and figure out the percentage of women. Then compare that to the FAA database.

OOfff 05-23-2019 09:55 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2825004)
You'd "bet that." Because you just have a feeling?

It looks like anecdotes work on both sides of this argument.

I think I’ve been fairly consistent in saying that nobody has statistics either way. When you make an affirmative claim that white males are disadvantaged and/or displaced, you should support it with evidence. Generally, one doesn’t provide evidence to hold a skeptical position. Hence the “prove god doesn’t exist” logical fallacy that many theists run into.

GogglesPisano 05-23-2019 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine (Post 2825008)
We already have the numbers. Just look at your seniority list and figure out the percentage of women. Then compare that to the FAA database.

Garbage in. Garbage out. No one is disputing there are more men than women pilots. People are disputing the hurdles and difficulties various people face.

How many women even want to be pilots? No one has any access to the data. What’s the percentage of women who start out Day 1 in flight school and make it to a major 10 years later? What’s the percentage of men? Of minorities.

Just because there are fewer doesn’t mean they have a tougher journey.

How many men are beauticians?

2StgTurbine 05-23-2019 11:06 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 2825083)
People are disputing the hurdles and difficulties various people face.

Well then this argument will never be resolved.

About 5% of the commercial pilot population in the US is female. That means they should make up about 5% of the applications and 5% of the seniority list. If your company has more than that, then there may be a case for reverse discrimination.

My point is that even in the most extreme cases, we are talking about a dozen more women at one company than one would expect. Yet somehow, those few women are preventing hundreds of men on this site from getting hired at a major.

GogglesPisano 05-23-2019 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine (Post 2825108)
Well then this argument will never be resolved.

About 5% of the commercial pilot population in the US is female. That means they should make up about 5% of the applications and 5% of the seniority list. If your company has more than that, then there may be a case for reverse discrimination.

My point is that even in the most extreme cases, we are talking about a dozen more women at one company than one would expect. Yet somehow, those few women are preventing hundreds of men on this site from getting hired at a major.

Point taken. Without valid statistics this issue will never be resolved.

Cheers.

OOfff 05-23-2019 11:46 AM


Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine (Post 2825108)
Well then this argument will never be resolved.

About 5% of the commercial pilot population in the US is female. That means they should make up about 5% of the applications and 5% of the seniority list. If your company has more than that, then there may be a case for reverse discrimination.

My point is that even in the most extreme cases, we are talking about a dozen more women at one company than one would expect. Yet somehow, those few women are preventing hundreds of men on this site from getting hired at a major.

This assumes an even distribution throughout the age and seniority spectrum. That seems unlikely

JohnBurke 05-23-2019 01:24 PM

It has little to do with hurt feelings about displacement.

If someone has achieved their seat in the cockpit because they bought it, or because they're ethnic, or because of their gender, or any reason other than they're well qualified for the position, they become a weak link. Nobody wants to be saddled with a weak link.

OOfff 05-23-2019 03:00 PM


Originally Posted by JohnBurke (Post 2825184)
It has little to do with hurt feelings about displacement.

If someone has achieved their seat in the cockpit because they bought it, or because they're ethnic, or because of their gender, or any reason other than they're well qualified for the position, they become a weak link. Nobody wants to be saddled with a weak link.

Please provide any evidence at all that this is a problem.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands