Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Do busts really matter if from PNCL or MESA?? >

Do busts really matter if from PNCL or MESA??

Search
Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Do busts really matter if from PNCL or MESA??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-2010, 11:08 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by Pinchanickled View Post
Understandably, there are standards set forth that pilots AND the examiners need to follow. Given multiple failures at the same time is rediculous. If the examiner doesn't create a realistic environment, what do you do?? When you're going missed on a CAT 2, and an engine fire happens along with thrust reverser deployment all at the same time...is overwhelming. No excuses, but a fair shake would be nice to have. And it doesn't make it any easier when your examiner has a reputation of having a desire to fail people.

It just amazes me, failures are rare at major airlines. Regional airlines fail people constantly. Is it the quick minded video game playing younger generation that are better pilots? Or the gray haired weather pilots with experience better? YOU CANT SAY!!! It's really determined by each individual pilot. All I know is the bottom feeders are plagued with failures. Busts at bottom feeders are just a way of life it seems. At the major level, the more professional level, it seems that warm up sims, training to proficiency are a very very nice thing to have on your side.
Well, two schools of thought. One, the majors are able to attract the "creme de la creme" from the military as well as regional and other majors. The interview process weeds out the chaff and the strong generally make it through. As a result, there are fewer failures because they attract and retain the strongest pilots by and large.

Two, the regionals don't have the luxury of always attracting the best and the brightest and retaining them. As a result, the weeding out is done during training. You are right, there are rogue check airman out there. When they exist, the need to be counseled and if they don't correct their performance they need to be removed as check airman. That is a simple fix. The reality is, the POI overseeing the airline doesn't like high bust rates. It's easy for a Program Manager to look at the baseline failure rates and compare them to check airmen. If the usual pass rate is 90% and one check airman passes only 50% then perhaps there is a problem. The other issue is that most regionals don't operate under AQP training requirements. Therefore, they do a standard 441 ride where its pass or fail. Now it is up to the check airman but with the exception of the ATP/Type Ride they have the ability to redo a maneuver up to three times. But that's his discretion.

Again, ask yourself why you got an unsat? Did you not prioritize properly. The engine on fire is designed to pull your attention from the fact that a reverser deployed. Going missed off CAT I, II or III shouldn't matter. Its the same maneuver just closer to the ground. Fly the plane. Let the fire burn. Take care of the reverser. Once its stowed, then take care of the fire. If you got distracted and didn't fly the airplane within tolerance its a legit bust. He must see you can demonstrate mastery of the plane under all conditions.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:22 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,735
Default

Don't they give you 3 TTP here at Pinnacle? Even if you screw up your engine failure, that should only be one TTP. I keep hearing all these rumors about how pilots at Pinnacle such such as "Pink slip xxx" busting a PC for something very small, but when I was in the sim (as a non-fly) with him giving a Type ride I thought he was more than fair. There has to be more to the this story.

To answer your question, I can't say what it will do to your chance of getting on with the majors, but if it was me, I would just be honest about it and try not to blame someone else.

This has nothing to do with your question, but if you consider the company you work for (Pinnacle) a bottom feeder, why don't you just put your 2 weeks notice in. If that's how you feel about the company you work for. IMO it sounds like you wanted to come here and wanted the quick upgrade and that didn't happen, you are ****ed off at the company, later on busted a PC and try to blame someone else but yourself.
Silver02ex is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:28 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
Default

Something sounds off. Both MESA and PNCL will retrain in the checkride 3 times prior to failure.... Ie 3 "sim freezes".
SpiraMirabilis is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:28 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by Pinchanickled View Post
I have had good luck on all my checkrides from when I first started. I worked at another regional airline before with a long wait for upgrade. I came here to go for the "guaranteed" quick upgrade. Unfortunately, that did not happen with the age 65 rule.

Recently I "popped" a checkride here. First and only failure. I am wondering how the majors will look at this.

I know majors look very closely at your training record. But if they see a bust on a PC at one of these bottom feeder companies, do they even consider it? Now I truely know the reason and driving force behind the quick upgrade here.

It just seems when you have an airline that hands out failures like a NYC meterman, that the recruiters at the top level would probably see right through that.
What does Mesa have to do with this? You fly for Pinnacle, right? A bust is a bust, I don't care who you work for. I think it's weak that you'd even ask this question here in the form that you did.
Slice is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:51 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
Default

A significant number of pilots have made it through training at both Mesa and Pinnacle and never busted anything. Blaming the airline will do nothing but make you look bad. Like others said, own up to your error, learn from it, and take the stance that nobody is perfect.
lolwut is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:02 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jiminmem's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: A320 B Side
Posts: 222
Default

Which airline has this on their application?
jiminmem is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:44 PM
  #17  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,297
Default

Originally Posted by Pinchanickled View Post

Recently I "popped" a checkride here. First and only failure. I am wondering how the majors will look at this.

I know majors look very closely at your training record. But if they see a bust on a PC at one of these bottom feeder companies, do they even consider it? Now I truely know the reason and driving force behind the quick upgrade here.

It just seems when you have an airline that hands out failures like a NYC meterman, that the recruiters at the top level would probably see right through that.
In the past, they might overlook one bust at any airline, particularly if it was known by the recruiters to hand out an inordinate number of failures.

But post-pinnacle, I have a suspicion that majors will be concerned about the liaibility associated with us sub-par regional pilots. Unfortunately, a plaintiff's attorney could do a lot of damage with blemishes on a pilot's record. My guess is airline legal departments may set limits on who they can hire. I assume one bust would not be a deal breaker, but I would prefer not to have one in this climate. If your next few are good that will help to put this one behind you.

Also think about how you will address this at an interview...

DO NOT say that the examiner was unfair, too tough, inconsistent, etc...even if that's exactly what happened. This will indicate that you don't accept responsibility.

I would also avoid a "poop happens" explanation (even though poop does in fact happen). This will send the message that you are lackadaisical and not firmly committed to controlling your destiny...or that you simply suck.

Even if you really didn't do anything wrong, I might make up an explanation about what happened, how you learned from it, and what you will do differently in the future. They want to feel comfortable that this will not be a trend, so you need to identify a "fix" (even if there really isn't one).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:51 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Dominican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 747 captain
Posts: 1,549
Default

Just ask yourself if major airlines consider your experience in Pinnacle or MESA as valid experience to hire you, I think that they do since PCL pilots have moved on to greener pastures without a problem, so if the answer evidently is yes, then so their training records are consider valid. You also said that failures are rare at majors, how do you know that? training records are not available to anyone outside of the training departments and just because pilots don't come here and cry the blues about how the checker was unethical and busted me, how dared he? that doesn't mean they do not happen.

Other pilots that have busted a ride before have gone on to major airline jobs, but I can guarantee you that none that have your attitude has.

Its been a while...but I didn't think they could give you compound failures on a "jeopardy" checking event?
If that is even what happened, In my experience as a check airman I have learned that individuals explaining their bust are always presenting an "Iceberg" they only show a small portion of the event usually reconstructed to make everything else but them to be at fault but you don't see what is under the water line, usually twice as large as what they show
The Dominican is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 01:05 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DashDriverYV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: back in the right
Posts: 406
Default

Originally Posted by Pinchanickled View Post
I have had good luck on all my checkrides from when I first started. I worked at another regional airline before with a long wait for upgrade. I came here to go for the "guaranteed" quick upgrade. Unfortunately, that did not happen with the age 65 rule.

Recently I "popped" a checkride here. First and only failure. I am wondering how the majors will look at this.

I know majors look very closely at your training record. But if they see a bust on a PC at one of these bottom feeder companies, do they even consider it? Now I truely know the reason and driving force behind the quick upgrade here.

It just seems when you have an airline that hands out failures like a NYC meterman, that the recruiters at the top level would probably see right through that.
The more I read your post, the more inclined I am to remind you," When you think you're surrounded by *********s, It's probably you".

You have a poor attitude when it comes to professionalism and manning up. Perhaps you have a future in Airline Management, or politics.
DashDriverYV is offline  
Old 06-08-2010, 01:28 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SilverandSore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CA
Posts: 483
Default

Originally Posted by Pinchanickled View Post
Given multiple failures at the same time is rediculous.

You may want to brush up on your spelling too, from what I understand, Delta is very unforgiving with regard to typos on your application.
SilverandSore is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thrill
Mesa Airlines
2
12-14-2009 04:55 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
flycrj200
Regional
14
12-06-2008 10:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices