Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
PIC vs widebody intl SIC time... >

PIC vs widebody intl SIC time...

Search
Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

PIC vs widebody intl SIC time...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2010, 02:19 PM
  #1  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Default PIC vs widebody intl SIC time...

Hi, to preface my question I am like many others out there with 2500hrs of SIC 121 US regional time and 0 121 PIC. Captain upgrade is likely 3-5 years (2 minimum) where I am at. I am considering going overseas to fly for a well known carrier flying wide body aircraft internationally (passenger). The upgrade would likely be 7 years (which is longer than I would plan on staying). My question is, in the eyes of a US legacy carrier recruiter, how would widebody SIC experience flying to 60 countries compare to say 1500 121 PIC gained staying at a regional? How would one fare trying to re-enter the US (legacy carrier) market 5 years from now on either course? Thanks!
fredsmith is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 03:20 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,233
Default

As depressing as this sounds I'd say staying at your regional and pursuing PIC time is a better choice if you really want a US major airline career in the long run.

You just don't get the maturing experience needed to compete for major airline job being SIC in any sort of operation. Another part of it - that overseas carrier is not operating by FAA standards and is not under FAA supervision. It is a big red flag.

Also, besides the flight hours I suggest you strengthen other important aspects of your application. You have to have leadership, customer service and preferably volunteer experience. Remember - recruiters are HR folks, not pilots. Make sure you get involved in your community, housing association (talking about it was 80% of my interview), maybe some volunteer organization, always go out of your way to help passengers - a couple of thank you letters from your CP will go a long way too.

Good luck!
Lifeisgood is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 03:25 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

PIC time is better. Domestic is better. Overseas flying sucks. I flew the 777 around the world and "there's no place like home!"
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 07:06 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

It depends, generally PIC is the safest route but for those who hire without it I'm sure they would consider international widebody SIC to better than regional SIC. It's a reasonable assumption in that the screening and culture at a place like EK would ensure that you are not the stereotypical "flight-info" regional FO.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-08-2010, 01:56 PM
  #5  
New Hire
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 6
Default

thanks for the feedback. In no small part, the compensation, being 3-4 times what I make now is a factor. I just want to work my way back around 5 years from now... the 're-entry' strategy is what im concerned about...
fredsmith is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lakehouse
Hiring News
32
08-24-2010 10:38 AM
Poke Pilot
Hiring News
27
08-20-2010 05:34 PM
Airman
Part 135
37
06-24-2010 05:37 AM
JeepDrowner
Regional
85
10-03-2009 05:18 AM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices