Skywest with criminal record?
#21
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,870
Likes: 666
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Expungement will not absolutely keep the airlines or TSA from finding out but it can help you get a job.
Airlines are always have in mind how you are going to look in the media after a major accident. "Captain of fatal crash was ex-con, had multiple DUI's, had extensive criminal record, etc, etc"
In such circumstances the media will take any little tidbit and make it into the biggest mountain they possibly can...scandal sells, in a big way. But there's a good chance that the media won't find out about an expunged criminal record....even though the airline knows they sure as hell aren't going to say anything if you are lying in the bottom of a smoking hole.
Airlines are always have in mind how you are going to look in the media after a major accident. "Captain of fatal crash was ex-con, had multiple DUI's, had extensive criminal record, etc, etc"
In such circumstances the media will take any little tidbit and make it into the biggest mountain they possibly can...scandal sells, in a big way. But there's a good chance that the media won't find out about an expunged criminal record....even though the airline knows they sure as hell aren't going to say anything if you are lying in the bottom of a smoking hole.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
I'm interested in the expungement issue. Utah law says:
If an agency does not receive the expungement order, they are not required to seal their records. A government agency that has received an expungement order will respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. A person who has had records expunged may respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. The order to seal records applies only to government agencies. Other records, such as news accounts of an arrest or conviction, are not affected.
After a record is expunged, an agency's sealed records can still be viewed and copied by some government officials, and the court can order the records unsealed under some conditions.
My question is how are airlines able to get records that should be viewed only by government agencies? Can you respond as if the event never happened?
When is an expungement not an expungement?
Sorry for the thread drift, folks.
If an agency does not receive the expungement order, they are not required to seal their records. A government agency that has received an expungement order will respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. A person who has had records expunged may respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. The order to seal records applies only to government agencies. Other records, such as news accounts of an arrest or conviction, are not affected.
After a record is expunged, an agency's sealed records can still be viewed and copied by some government officials, and the court can order the records unsealed under some conditions.
My question is how are airlines able to get records that should be viewed only by government agencies? Can you respond as if the event never happened?
When is an expungement not an expungement?
Sorry for the thread drift, folks.
#23
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,870
Likes: 666
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I'm interested in the expungement issue. Utah law says:
If an agency does not receive the expungement order, they are not required to seal their records. A government agency that has received an expungement order will respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. A person who has had records expunged may respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. The order to seal records applies only to government agencies. Other records, such as news accounts of an arrest or conviction, are not affected.
After a record is expunged, an agency's sealed records can still be viewed and copied by some government officials, and the court can order the records unsealed under some conditions.
My question is how are airlines able to get records that should be viewed only by government agencies? Can you respond as if the event never happened?
When is an expungement not an expungement?
Sorry for the thread drift, folks.
If an agency does not receive the expungement order, they are not required to seal their records. A government agency that has received an expungement order will respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. A person who has had records expunged may respond to an inquiry as though that arrest or conviction did not occur. The order to seal records applies only to government agencies. Other records, such as news accounts of an arrest or conviction, are not affected.
After a record is expunged, an agency's sealed records can still be viewed and copied by some government officials, and the court can order the records unsealed under some conditions.
My question is how are airlines able to get records that should be viewed only by government agencies? Can you respond as if the event never happened?
When is an expungement not an expungement?
Sorry for the thread drift, folks.
The potential problem is that arrests and convictions which get reported to the FBI database and are subsequently expunged at the state level don't get expunged by the FBI.
1) They are feds, and states can't tell them what to do.
2) Their database is used for national security and intelligence purposes so they don't ever want to erase any information. Since they don't have to, better assume that they don't.
Now not every Tom, Dick, and Harry can access the FBI database, but airlines are special. They actually do have access since they have to ensure they are not hiring people with TSA disqualifying backgrounds.
So worst case what happens is the airline gets to look at the Db, and they see something you did not report...their assumption is that you lied so they don't hire you.
It's possible some airlines might try to comply with state law and "pretend" they didn't see something in the FBI database but this is such a special situation that there's probably nobody interested in enforcing it. No prosecutor wants to make headlines because he's trying to force airlines to hire ex-cons. It's just a weird situation, and unless you work in an airline's HR it's hard to say exactly how they would deal with this.
#24
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Lunar Lander Commander
The fallacy here is that this UT law, which is STATE law. FEDERAL law ALWAYS prevails over state law.
The potential problem is that arrests and convictions which get reported to the FBI database and are subsequently expunged at the state level don't get expunged by the FBI.
1) They are feds, and states can't tell them what to do.
2) Their database is used for national security and intelligence purposes so they don't ever want to erase any information. Since they don't have to, better assume that they don't.
Now not every Tom, Dick, and Harry can access the FBI database, but airlines are special. They actually do have access since they have to ensure they are not hiring people with TSA disqualifying backgrounds.
So worst case what happens is the airline gets to look at the Db, and they see something you did not report...their assumption is that you lied so they don't hire you.
It's possible some airlines might try to comply with state law and "pretend" they didn't see something in the FBI database but this is such a special situation that there's probably nobody interested in enforcing it. No prosecutor wants to make headlines because he's trying to force airlines to hire ex-cons. It's just a weird situation, and unless you work in an airline's HR it's hard to say exactly how they would deal with this.
The potential problem is that arrests and convictions which get reported to the FBI database and are subsequently expunged at the state level don't get expunged by the FBI.
1) They are feds, and states can't tell them what to do.
2) Their database is used for national security and intelligence purposes so they don't ever want to erase any information. Since they don't have to, better assume that they don't.
Now not every Tom, Dick, and Harry can access the FBI database, but airlines are special. They actually do have access since they have to ensure they are not hiring people with TSA disqualifying backgrounds.
So worst case what happens is the airline gets to look at the Db, and they see something you did not report...their assumption is that you lied so they don't hire you.
It's possible some airlines might try to comply with state law and "pretend" they didn't see something in the FBI database but this is such a special situation that there's probably nobody interested in enforcing it. No prosecutor wants to make headlines because he's trying to force airlines to hire ex-cons. It's just a weird situation, and unless you work in an airline's HR it's hard to say exactly how they would deal with this.
I guess the feds forgot about the 10th amendment a while back.
#25
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,870
Likes: 666
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Federal legal supremacy is included in the base document of the constitution. The 10th came later (amendment, duh) and says that those powers not specifically designated to the union by the constitution are assumed to be held by the states.
In this case legal supremacy was already assigned to the fed by the constitution, and the 10th specifically did not alter that.
In this case legal supremacy was already assigned to the fed by the constitution, and the 10th specifically did not alter that.
#26
You're not sunk, just be honest (I can't overstate the honesty part) and factual. If you've stayed out of trouble for over a decade now, and have a good track record both in aviation and in your personal life since then, you have a chance. I got a call a couple weeks after submitting that questionnaire.
Best of luck, hopefully we'll see you out on the line in a few short months. Let me know if I can help at all.
Best of luck, hopefully we'll see you out on the line in a few short months. Let me know if I can help at all.
Best of luck!!
#28
Denver,
I just got off the phone with Daniel Levi who's an attorney who handles Canadian clearance issues. He mentioned that if your record was expunged that all you would need is a letter from him and you'll be fine. Even if it has not been expunged but at least 5 years have passed, then you would need a similar letter. The downside is the it will cost about $750. Call him if you have any questions. 1 (888) 947-9445. I hope this helps
I just got off the phone with Daniel Levi who's an attorney who handles Canadian clearance issues. He mentioned that if your record was expunged that all you would need is a letter from him and you'll be fine. Even if it has not been expunged but at least 5 years have passed, then you would need a similar letter. The downside is the it will cost about $750. Call him if you have any questions. 1 (888) 947-9445. I hope this helps
#29
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Lunar Lander Commander
Denver,
I just got off the phone with Daniel Levi who's an attorney who handles Canadian clearance issues. He mentioned that if your record was expunged that all you would need is a letter from him and you'll be fine. Even if it has not been expunged but at least 5 years have passed, then you would need a similar letter. The downside is the it will cost about $750. Call him if you have any questions. 1 (888) 947-9445. I hope this helps
I just got off the phone with Daniel Levi who's an attorney who handles Canadian clearance issues. He mentioned that if your record was expunged that all you would need is a letter from him and you'll be fine. Even if it has not been expunged but at least 5 years have passed, then you would need a similar letter. The downside is the it will cost about $750. Call him if you have any questions. 1 (888) 947-9445. I hope this helps
From what I understand it says "w/n the last 10 years have you been convicted of..." I got to say NO to all of it on the application. None of my "transgressions" are on that list of offenses. The list contains things like treason and armed robbery and extortion. I think I am good unless I decide to join the mob and then get caught. But thanks for checking into that, I really appreciate it.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
An expungement through the court process removes ALL history of conviction/arrest/nole pross/withdrawn evidence from your record once it is approved. All states are required to process the court order through all reporting agencies.
FBI through State/Local.
Trust me.
FBI through State/Local.
Trust me.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



