Republic versus Trans States?
05-19-2013, 03:00 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Biggest avantage for TSA is a better contract. The cancellation pay is huge. Talk to any of these RP guys about 85 hour months that detiorate to guarantee because of cancellations and reschedules. I've worked at both (RP as an FA and TSA as an FO) and both are about the same in terms of the way the company treats you, but TSA has a better contract. On top of that you have the situation between the management at Republic and the Teamsters which doesn't look to get any better for a while. The situation at TSA has improved a lot over the last year and keeps getting better due to changes in management.
05-19-2013, 03:21 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Rah has bettr equip and a future but the company sucks. Once you get a line, its not that bad and we rarely cx. All regionals suck though so Eagle,psa,pdt,xjet,skyW,rah all Suck!! Get the glass jet time and bolt. Good luck wherever you go bro.
05-19-2013, 03:45 PM
#7
Layover Master
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,310
Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot
Rah has bettr equip and a future but the company sucks. Once you get a line, its not that bad and we rarely cx. All regionals suck though so Eagle,psa,pdt,xjet,skyW,rah all Suck!! Get the glass jet time and bolt. Good luck wherever you go bro.
Yes, the regionals all blow, but they are not all created equal. Go somewhere that you don't have to commute (subject to change of course) and somewhere with a decent contract and less than contentious management/line pilot relationship.
05-19-2013, 03:56 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
While I don't like the regional business model, they are not all the same as you seem to allude to. RAH has, without question or argument, one the worst contracts out there. Further, the pay scale is an embarrassment for the equipment.... there is a reason their own union is HIGHLY discouraging any pilot from gaining employment there.
Yes, the regionals all blow, but they are not all created equal. Go somewhere that you don't have to commute (subject to change of course) and somewhere with a decent contract and less than contentious management/line pilot relationship.
Yes, the regionals all blow, but they are not all created equal. Go somewhere that you don't have to commute (subject to change of course) and somewhere with a decent contract and less than contentious management/line pilot relationship.
05-19-2013, 04:02 PM
#9
On Reserve
Thread Starter
Joined APC: May 2013
Position: 206 Left Seat
Posts: 11
update
Thank you guys for the information, I am aware of what is going on at RAH.
here is my situation, I live in Kansas city so the possible non commute with rah is appealing but St. Louis is not that far of a commute either and there contract/pay is more appealing.
Also I have heard that upgrade times at tsa could be within 12 months.
Interviewed with eagle and they were hiring for the same thing as tsa (145) but were saying upgrades would take 5-6 years with a couple years on reserse Possible.
I know regionals Suck and that I need jet time so where would be better to get that? TSA or RAH
here is my situation, I live in Kansas city so the possible non commute with rah is appealing but St. Louis is not that far of a commute either and there contract/pay is more appealing.
Also I have heard that upgrade times at tsa could be within 12 months.
Interviewed with eagle and they were hiring for the same thing as tsa (145) but were saying upgrades would take 5-6 years with a couple years on reserse Possible.
I know regionals Suck and that I need jet time so where would be better to get that? TSA or RAH
05-19-2013, 04:11 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2013
Posts: 2,594
Originally Posted by robertcfi
Thank you guys for the information, I am aware of what is going on at RAH.
here is my situation, I live in Kansas city so the possible non commute with rah is appealing but St. Louis is not that far of a commute either and there contract/pay is more appealing.
Also I have heard that upgrade times at tsa could be within 12 months.
Interviewed with eagle and they were hiring for the same thing as tsa (145) but were saying upgrades would take 5-6 years with a couple years on reserse Possible.
I know regionals Suck and that I need jet time so where would be better to get that? TSA or RAH
here is my situation, I live in Kansas city so the possible non commute with rah is appealing but St. Louis is not that far of a commute either and there contract/pay is more appealing.
Also I have heard that upgrade times at tsa could be within 12 months.
Interviewed with eagle and they were hiring for the same thing as tsa (145) but were saying upgrades would take 5-6 years with a couple years on reserse Possible.
I know regionals Suck and that I need jet time so where would be better to get that? TSA or RAH
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
