Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Career Questions
Tricky interview questions... >

Tricky interview questions...

Search
Notices
Career Questions Career advice, interview prep and gouges, job fairs, etc.

Tricky interview questions...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2006, 12:00 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh View Post
Here's my favorite gotcha from a few years back:

You and your crew have checked into the hotel and decide to change then meet in the lobby for dinner. Upon coming back down, you see that the captain is wearing a pink dress and high heels. What do you do?
It depends: is she cute, how long is our overnight, and will I have to see her again?
POPA is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 12:07 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CRJ left
Posts: 248
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh View Post
Single nav light is out? No problem. The aircraft is equipped with two nav lights on each wing. We call maintenance, write up an MEL entry, and off we go.
FlyerJohn, silly me! I forgot about the dual lights. I liked your other answers as well (day/night, MEL, ect). However I was under the impression this type of question was asked to test mainly your integrity/safety attitude/conflict management, not so much systems knowledge (I might be wrong though). Don't get me wrong, I think you brought up some good points, and I would probably answer in your same way if asked that type of question. I'm sure asking questions like yours shows critical thinking and proactive problem-solving, but what if they were interested in knowing how you would handle the conflict with your captain?
If that is the case, they will answer all your questions saying that BOTH navs are out, it is night, it can't be repaired that night, it can't be MEL, ect. In other words they put you in a situation where you either break the FARs and go with what the captain says, or stand up to the captain and tell him its a no-go.
Obviously, you don't want to break FARs, or admit you would at an interview....

How would you handle the conflict with the captain if he was completely motivated to go? What if you cannot convince him be talking to him?
What do you do? Refuse to board the aircraft? Call company ops and denounce the matter?

I know this is a far-fetched scenaro...but reading some gouges it lookes like they are not that uncommon.

thanks to all that replied!
palgia841 is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 05:12 PM
  #13  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Most of those questions are looking for either conflict resolution, or outside thinking. (Sometimes both).

In my experience with the nav light question, I've never heard of anybody pressing the issue, but ALWAYS go with the reg/safety. We all know that in real life, we'd do a CB reset and "ops would check good" right up until we got out of the block, then fly home and write it up.

How about this one - it's pretty common:

Captain is flying an ILS approach to minimums. You're making the required call outs.

you: "200"
CA: "check"
you: "100"
CA: "check"
"Minimums - nothing in sight - go around"

The captain does not respond and continues to fly the approach. What do you do?
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 06:34 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Airdesk
Posts: 31
Default

Say "I have control", and take over because the captain is incapacitated. Answer the questions how HR wants to hear.
xtreme_jetlag is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 06:48 PM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
icebluecuda's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 25
Default

Not for an interview, but on a flawless PC oral my grandfather was asked what the RPM of the beacon was for the DC-9. Its 49RPM.
icebluecuda is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 06:56 PM
  #16  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by xtreme_jetlag View Post
Say "I have control", and take over because the captain is incapacitated. Answer the questions how HR wants to hear.
You would take over the controls at 200' AGL at the snap of the hat? (especially after only one callout?) Are you sure that's what HR (and other line pilots sitting on the panel) want to hear?
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:12 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LAfrequentflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,242
Default

I don't think fighting for the controls is the thing to do in the 121 world...Remind the CA again - "sir, we need to go around." If nothing, I would tell ATC we don't have the runway environment in sight and are excuting a go around.

Of course, I know nothing and am often reminded of that fact by my wife , daughter, and mom...


_LAFF
LAfrequentflyer is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:38 PM
  #18  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer View Post
I don't think fighting for the controls is the thing to do in the 121 world...Remind the CA again - "sir, we need to go around." If nothing, I would tell ATC we don't have the runway environment in sight and are excuting a go around.

Of course, I know nothing and am often reminded of that fact by my wife , daughter, and mom...

_LAFF
IMHO, this is the BEST answer out there that I've heard so far. Why? Because it doesn't require wrestling for control at low altitude, and puts the CA in a position where he MUST go around or risk having to explain the situation to the FAA. (Since you have reported over the radio "nothing in sight").

When we asked this question, we didn't just stop at minimums. Instead, we would count down while the question is asked... "minimums"... "minimums minus 50"... "minus 100".... "minus 150"

We did have one or two folks that just didn't say/do anything and presumably hit the runway.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:39 PM
  #19  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer View Post
I don't think fighting for the controls is the thing to do in the 121 world...Remind the CA again - "sir, we need to go around." If nothing, I would tell ATC we don't have the runway environment in sight and are excuting a go around.

Of course, I know nothing and am often reminded of that fact by my wife , daughter, and mom...

_LAFF
IMHO, this is the BEST answer out there that I've heard so far. Why? Because it doesn't require wrestling for control at low altitude, and puts the CA in a position where he MUST go around or risk having to explain the situation to the FAA. (Since you have reported over the radio "nothing in sight").

When we asked this question, we didn't just stop at minimums. Instead, we would count down while the question is asked... "minimums"... "minimums minus 50"... "minus 100".... "minus 150"

We did have one or two folks that just didn't say/do anything and presumably hit the runway...


There are plenty of other questions as well... Drunk captain in hotel lobby after a long overnight, what do you do?
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 08:00 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Early Retiree SWA
Posts: 354
Default

Tell the captain he has two choices here... Either he calls in sick right then and there to get off the trip and sleep it off, or the FO goes directly to the company. Never let the intoxicated crew get in the cockpit.

K
Kapitanleutnant is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwes
Major
82
04-26-2007 06:16 PM
UNDGUY
Hiring News
35
03-04-2007 01:31 PM
buffalopilot
Regional
23
01-21-2007 09:18 PM
MX727
Cargo
32
09-11-2006 09:09 PM
UConnQB14
Regional
7
02-27-2006 01:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices