Search
Notices

Atlas b766

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-21-2018, 11:20 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by boeingdvr View Post
Oh. R3 = 3am to 9am at the CVG hub. It's completely slammed with 100's of pilots. Nowhere to sleep, sit, or a corner to find.

Then they activate you @ 845am to operate to a garden spot like GSO or RIC. ��


It's quite humbling. You realize you're doing it for free on 62 hour min pay at 80 bucks an hour.

Come on over and see for yourself.
Can you say..... fatigued
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 03:50 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 84
Default

I cannot say enough bad about Atlas, a complete disgrace and embarrassment to the industry. A toxic horrible work environment, I am in awe of what management is able to get away with, yet the planes still keep moving and the golden giant keeps reaping glorious profits. If anyone has an ounce of self respect they would not come here. I have had several people suggest with a straight face that I consider going to a regional (8th yr 767 CA). What I can say is, one way or another, I won't be working here soon. So that's my honest advice to anyone considering this dump. The ACMI charter thing can be interesting and Omni or Kalitta would be great if thats what floats your boat. If you hate your life, don't want to make any money, and don't want to be home then Atlas is worth a look.
5Ypilot is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 03:57 PM
  #23  
Layover Master
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,310
Default

Originally Posted by KA350Driver View Post
They were bad pilots then. It had nothing to do with the damn instruments. If you can’t transition from round gauges to glass then I don’t know what to tell you. It’s not rocket science.
Originally Posted by Reactivity View Post
If you say so.

In the past few years, UPS has hired a ridiculous number of Atlas pilots. (The story goes that at one point, the UPS chief pilot called the Atlas chief pilot to advise him that there were something like 60 Atlas pilots in the UPS pool at that time.) In my two years at ABX, where we have bunch of those 767s with the old instruments, pilots have been hired at UPS, FedEx, United, American, Alaska, Virgin America, and Southwest. And those are just the ones I know about. Apparently, those companies really don't care. So if you're interested in flying for one of those, it looks like your career prospects won't be damaged by a stint flying old airplanes.
Perhaps some of them were bad pilots. At least two of them had been flying 727's for the past 10 years and had real struggles.
I'm aware the airlines you mentioned will hire folks like you describe. My point was simply that you said "nobody cares about the shape of the flight instruments you've been flying" is wrong. There are some that care. I'm not suggesting a person make a decision based on this, i'm just pointing out that some places DO care.
PotatoChip is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 04:37 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip View Post
Perhaps some of them were bad pilots. At least two of them had been flying 727's for the past 10 years and had real struggles.
I'm aware the airlines you mentioned will hire folks like you describe. My point was simply that you said "nobody cares about the shape of the flight instruments you've been flying" is wrong. There are some that care. I'm not suggesting a person make a decision based on this, i'm just pointing out that some places DO care.
Mostly they care about how you do flying the sim on your interview check...the glass in most of the 767s is nothing more than general aviation stuff. The flat panel glass is an easy transition. We got the 767S in 1998 and everyone came from 20 yrs of round dial or basic efis...the flat panel glass was not an issue for anyone. Now... if they just are horible pilots the process will weed them out, if not during sims which is rote training...then during IOE when they have to seat of the pants fly the plane.

Last edited by nitefr8dog; 11-23-2018 at 04:55 PM.
nitefr8dog is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 09:56 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: Left, right & center
Posts: 772
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip View Post
There are some that care. I'm not suggesting a person make a decision based on this, i'm just pointing out that some places DO care.
OK - now I'm curious. Who are these "some" to which you refer?
Reactivity is offline  
Old 11-24-2018, 03:33 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 698
Default

Originally Posted by 5Ypilot View Post
I cannot say enough bad about Atlas, a complete disgrace and embarrassment to the industry. A toxic horrible work environment, I am in awe of what management is able to get away with, yet the planes still keep moving and the golden giant keeps reaping glorious profits. If anyone has an ounce of self respect they would not come here. I have had several people suggest with a straight face that I consider going to a regional (8th yr 767 CA). What I can say is, one way or another, I won't be working here soon. So that's my honest advice to anyone considering this dump. The ACMI charter thing can be interesting and Omni or Kalitta would be great if thats what floats your boat. If you hate your life, don't want to make any money, and don't want to be home then Atlas is worth a look.
Agreed. I've actually thought about going back to the RJ's as a DEC, signing bonus, and flow.

It's absolutely awful here, I can't believe how poor the pay, and work rules are.
boeingdvr is offline  
Old 11-24-2018, 04:14 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
KingAirKiddo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: B777 FO
Posts: 35
Default

Sadly, I'm considering a lateral move or even DEC regional position, as well. I came here for the potential of what this place could be with a modicum of investment in people and infrastructure. The reality is that management is only interested in revenue production and bottom line results and could care less about organizational culture and keeping good employees happy and motivated.

Bottom line, "potential" does not pay the bills or hold my long term interest. I do not recommend Atlas to anybody in its present form.
KingAirKiddo is offline  
Old 11-24-2018, 06:15 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Originally Posted by No Land 3 View Post
2nd year with some OT will gross around 160k, at least I am. First year with a decent amount more OT will as well. You can make as much as you want. It really is all about deciding what you want more, time at home or money? It is difficult to be paid just the min guarantee. If I really wanted to, I probably could of grossed 200k my second year if I was an OT *****. I like my time at home however.
76s guys cant make that kind of change... not without a ton of OT anyway... there lines and flying is just not built that way.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 11-24-2018, 06:30 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Posts: 698
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130 View Post
76s guys cant make that kind of change... not without a ton of OT anyway... there lines and flying is just not built that way.
Don't plan on OT on the 76. First off, its seniority based. Secondly, after you've sat 10 days of r-3 at the hub, last thing you want to do is help the company out for a few bowls of porridge.

But, if you're dying to find out, come on over, and see for yourself!
boeingdvr is offline  
Old 11-24-2018, 06:33 AM
  #30  
Layover Master
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,310
Default

Originally Posted by Reactivity View Post
OK - now I'm curious. Who are these "some" to which you refer?
Largely corporate operators and some charter operators, and foreign contracts. If one steps outside of the airline box, and starts reading through other job postings, EFIS, glass, NG, and other buzz words are often used. Also, for many expat jobs there is an emphasis on glass cockpits and experience with advanced avionics. Yes, I realize this isn't the big US airlines, but I was just making the point that there are places that care, and you never know, you may suddenly find yourself in a position to need to apply to those places.
Flying a 767 with round gauges probably isn't going to hurt someone who has been flying Airbuses, but it at least might be a consideration to some people.
I remember when I flew at a regional that transitioned guys to the CRJ after decades of round dials. Several of them flat out quit, others struggled through the new cockpit, and others had no issues. Point is, as an HR recruiter hiring pilots, I'd want less of a chance of people struggling, so I'd choose those with experience that would have a better chance of success. And as we know, unfortunately we are in an HR driven hiring world now.
So while it may be a small point, it's still a consideration, and not a complete flip of the hand as if it doesn't matter at all.
PotatoChip is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dick Steel
Atlas/Polar
131
11-20-2018 04:45 AM
boeingdvr
Atlas/Polar
150
09-12-2018 06:14 PM
DC8DRIVER
Cargo
6
03-24-2014 06:37 AM
Polarfr8dog
Cargo
19
09-09-2011 04:22 PM
EZRider
Cargo
2
03-09-2010 06:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices