Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   Our new Lanyards (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/13056-our-new-lanyards.html)

Huck 05-26-2007 01:07 PM


Do you think ALPA could stop the Rule Change?
We'll never know, will we?

As to our experts, lobbyists, politically connected folks - their careers aren't harmed by this legislation, so they might have a different perspective. Threaten them with a comparable pay loss and see how hard they want to fight then.

(As a side note, I am also an AOPA member, and it sure is a contrast, watching the war being fought over user fees. Another "done deal" from Marion Blakey, but AOPA apperently hasn't got the word.....)

I'll give you MY perspective - you want to talk about leadership, let's talk leadership. Let's talk about the power of symbolism. About leaders who are willing to get down to the troop level and demonstrate that we're all in this together.

ALL Dave would have to do is say, "Guys I know this is a kick in the crotch. Let's find some ways to lessen the blow. How about a commitee of 5 F/O's and 5 captains who can meet and come up with ways to spread the wealth a little." Not much, maybe, but at least an acknowledgement that he represents ALL of us, not the widebody captains.

How about all the MEC telling us, in writing, what they plan to do at sixty. "I voted for this but I do not intend to profit from it." Again, symbolism.

And Redeye, this ain't the Navy, and we don't need an officer corps, thank you. That sh!t'll work on you when you're 22 but not now.

Speaking of which, you keep saying things like, "Is this your first airline?" or whether I've been in leadership (yes) or in the military (barely). So let me ask you one: Were you ever an F/O with kids? Did your wife stay home to raise them? How seriously would you want your union to take it if your upgrade was going to be delayed? Would you want them to go nuclear? Or just take the word of the inside-the-beltway professionals and cave like a house of cards, hoping for a few crumbs from the table of the congress?

Think of how hard you, Pappa Bear with some cubs at home depending on you, would have fought for $3150 a month....

matty 05-26-2007 01:38 PM

[QUOTE=RedeyeAV8r;171474]

Originally Posted by Nugget#69 (Post 171465)

You right, your new and it shows.
I doubt very seriusly at indoc the ALPA REP said " We won't go to Bat for you". Maybe you misunderstood.

If you read your contract you will see that in year #1 you are on Probation.
This is standard with most Airline Contracts, not just ALPA and not just at FedEx.


Isn't it because of ALPA that probation even exists at FedEx? I have heard that probation didn't even exist before the latest round of ALPA.

SleepyF18 05-26-2007 01:45 PM


Originally Posted by matty (Post 171531)


Isn't it because of ALPA that probation even exists at FedEx? I have heard that probation didn't even exist before the latest round of ALPA.

Not true. I've been here since 2000 and probation was here then, under FPA.

matty 05-26-2007 01:49 PM


Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r (Post 171497)
I do.........but do you really think the members of the MEC just made this decision on a whim?

Please answer these questions honestly.

Do you think ALPA could stop the Rule Change?

Asumming your answer to the above is NO:
Do you think it is in our best interest (I'm just a line dog like you)
(PILOTS) for ALPA to at least try to influence future language in potential legislation or FAA NPRM?


Assuming your answer to this is Yes:

If you were on the MEC or ALPA National Leadrship and all your duty experts from the Hill, Lobbyists, Lawyers and Politically connected folks tell you that
"This is a done deal"
"All your Senators and Congressman who were previously on your side have now switched their views"
"If you stop being viewed as obstuctionists you might (note I say MIGHT) have a shot at getting some wording in your favor"

I suppose you could choose not to believe them, but if this is what you were told........What would do?

Do you really think the MEC didn't know this was not going to be very popular?

Do you really think that this doesn't affect everyone on the MEC just as negatively as you?

I suppose the MEC could have simply made an easy decision and said We continue to vote NO.

I don't know if you were ever in the Military or if you ever had a leadership role in a previous life, but.................

Being a leader means you often have to make tough calls.

Being a leader isn't a popularity contest.

The MEC memebers were voted in because they had good credentials and had the trust of the membership and they have done many good things before.
Yes they made a tough call because they knew it wouldn't be very popular. Time will tell if they made the right call.


It is very simple...DW wanted to be able to fight for the guys in the back. If he would have gone with the FDX member majority, he would have had to vote "No" in the meeting. He knew that his "No" vote would be meaningless...He knew that ALPA was going to change their stance. So, if he voted "No" he would not have had a leg to stand on when he wanted to fight for the guys in the back to be able to come up to the front. Because he voted "Yes," he is able to get the caveate for the old folks in the wording of the legislation that ALPA is fighting for.


It is a very simple example of politics at work. I have to give him credit. He had an agenda and he knew what to do to make it work. He will be an ALPA National rep someday....good or bad.

I don't know why he is fighting for them to come back up, but he is...Once I figure out the reason for that, I'll let you know!:D

matty 05-26-2007 01:51 PM


Originally Posted by SleepyF18 (Post 171533)
Not true. I've been here since 2000 and probation was here then, under FPA.

Okay...maybe I am wrong (it is my one time for the month to be wrong!!!), but my brother's friend's Uncle's sister told me that it didn't used to exist...

Jetjok 05-26-2007 02:58 PM

Matty,

Probation did in fact, not exist, at FedEx before we unionized. Once FPA came into being, probation came with our first contract, I believe. Your brother's friend's uncle's sister was correct.;) And oh, by the way, nothing is "because of ALPA". Not a probationary period at most airlines, nor this Age 60 thing, nor anything else. "Things" that are here, after ALPA came on the property, are, for the most part, things that have been negotiated or agreed to by both the union and management.

MX727 05-26-2007 03:09 PM

[QUOTE=matty;171531]

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r (Post 171474)


Isn't it because of ALPA that probation even exists at FedEx? I have heard that probation didn't even exist before the latest round of ALPA.

We were all on permanent probation prior to ALPA/FPA/ALPA.

RedeyeAV8r 05-26-2007 03:24 PM


Originally Posted by Huck (Post 171522)
We'll never know, will we?


And Redeye, this ain't the Navy, and we don't need an officer corps, thank you. That sh!t'll work on you when you're 22 but not now.

Speaking of which, you keep saying things like, "Is this your first airline?" or whether I've been in leadership (yes) or in the military (barely). So let me ask you one: Were you ever an F/O with kids? Did your wife stay home to raise them? How seriously would you want your union to take it if your upgrade was going to be delayed? Would you want them to go nuclear? Or just take the word of the inside-the-beltway professionals and cave like a house of cards, hoping for a few crumbs from the table of the congress?

Think of how hard you, Pappa Bear with some cubs at home depending on you, would have fought for $3150 a month....

First you never answered my questions from the previous Post, but I'll answer yours.

As for miliary service. I also got my share of "Paid Vacations" away from my family in exotic places with of 2 years deployed service with Uncle Sam's misguided children, which is why I chose to stop flying fighters, but thanks for asking.

Huck this is my 3rd Airline, how bout you?

In my first two I was a Flight engineer for over 4 years and Junior FO for the 4 more. I missed 8 out of 8 Christmas and Thanksgivings and almost as many Birthdays and Anniversaries.
I've seen the Junior side for a long time. I will be junior in my current seat until I retire.

Pal tell me how long you have been here. You have one sense of entitlement don't you? Your lucky as hell to be in the right seat of a widebody making well over 6 figures if you have been here less than 5 years. Excuse me I forgot, DW and the MEC worked on that last contract. I guess they had an agenda there too. Don't take things for granted. You could be a 18 Year USAir FO (formerly a CAP) who will now be junior to a 2 year AWEST FO.

fdxflyer 05-26-2007 03:58 PM

Past decisions, experiences, and sacrifices mean nothing in a discussion like this. Your past difficulties don't make you more correct no matter which side of a disagreement you are on. If I had the biggest story of sacrifice and difficulty, would I be right??? Thought so.

Let's argue about whether we "did the right thing" on the merits -- not merit badges!!

Falconjet 05-26-2007 04:09 PM


Originally Posted by matty (Post 171536)
It is very simple...DW wanted to be able to fight for the guys in the back. If he would have gone with the FDX member majority, he would have had to vote "No" in the meeting. He knew that his "No" vote would be meaningless...He knew that ALPA was going to change their stance. So, if he voted "No" he would not have had a leg to stand on when he wanted to fight for the guys in the back to be able to come up to the front. Because he voted "Yes," he is able to get the caveate for the old folks in the wording of the legislation that ALPA is fighting for.


It is a very simple example of politics at work. I have to give him credit. He had an agenda and he knew what to do to make it work. He will be an ALPA National rep someday....good or bad.

I don't know why he is fighting for them to come back up, but he is...Once I figure out the reason for that, I'll let you know!:D



Doing the RIGHT thing is NEVER meaningless.

DW just sold us out to ALPA National and Prater for the retro language in the press release.

Pitiful and totally without dignity.

FJ


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands