Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   Our new Lanyards (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/13056-our-new-lanyards.html)

MD11HOG 05-27-2007 07:45 AM

Wow,at least you didn't completly parrot the MEC line.
 

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r (Post 171620)
I agree with you ,

but when I hear young guys that have been here only less than 3 years saying it's all about ME ME ME,: excuse me for getting my feathers ruffled.

Now the bottom line is The rule is going to change. ALPA leaders have tried to tell everyone that it is over........some choose not to believe it.
Some think it is all a conspiracy. Move on, it's coming.

Now we have to focus on what can be done to lesson the negative effects.

I've read every union message and e-mailed my block rep. What negative effects are you talking about? What exactly are we going to do if the legislation is already written? I've heard this "mitigate the damage" crap from enough people blowing smoke up my ass. I haven't heard one example of a concrete action or even the promise of a reach around while I'm being bent over. The MEC doesn't have a plan of action after their political ploy of changing our position on 60. They are just covering their ass with shotgun statements. So, in case my poor communication skills are showing: What negative effects/damage are we going to be able to influence?

Albief15 05-27-2007 09:37 AM

Here's what the "mitigation" means....

Anyone over 60 still on the property can bid captain

Nobody over 60 will get a more stringent physical

Nobody over 60 will have their B plan touched...

So--yes...ALPA is working very hard to make sure none of the inputs by Congress or the FAA hurt the over 60 guys.

They will also tell you that they are working to make sure the rest of us can still retire at 60 without penalty, and that our B plans will not be affected either. Based on the energy expended on changing the law and protecting the over 60 crowd, and the lack of any communication on what they will do to help those affected negatively by the change, I am someone skeptical of their ability to carry this fight into the future for the junior guys benefit. I suspect they will simply say "we couldnt' win this fight either--its the IRS--not us..."

CaptainMark 05-27-2007 09:46 AM


Originally Posted by Albief15 (Post 171849)
They will also tell you that they are working to make sure the rest of us can still retire at 60 without penalty, and that our B plans will not be affected either.


quote from another member



"The IRS allows the second "B" fund for those who MUST retire before age 65. Without this exemption the “B” fund would be taxed as income and would add an additional 22+ percent to the cost of the “B” fund to the company. Then you can kiss it good-bye."

Gunter 05-27-2007 09:52 AM


Originally Posted by Albief15 (Post 171849)
...I am someone skeptical of their ability to carry this fight into the future for the junior guys benefit. I suspect they will simply say "we couldnt' win this fight either--its the IRS--not us..."


I hear you Albie.

Not sure exactly what you meant but I would like to change one thing.

I think they are perfectly able to fight for the junior guys. But they are not willing to expend much energy. It's not worth it. They'll let us fight that battle when we can hold MEC.

ALPA is truly a Captains' club.

FR8Hauler 05-27-2007 10:52 AM


Originally Posted by Toccata (Post 171795)
For clarification, do you mean the total amount of dues paid by the FedEx crewforce, or the percent of our income we pay for dues?

Total amount paid to ALPA by any crewforce.

MalteseX 05-28-2007 12:33 AM


Originally Posted by Nugget#69 (Post 171612)
OK for the record the ALPA reps at indoc were good guys and mentioned all the good ALPA has done. I didn't want this to come off bad, I thought I was just stating a fact.

Now since I'm here I'll through in my $.02. I don't know why everyone is so worriied at FedEx about the age 60 rule. 80% of the Capts I have flown with say they are going to retire at 60 regardless of the rule. Unless the rule change makes it so they can't without some major penalty. With that said, people worrying about upgrade really don't have much of an argument. Second, I know we would like to stop this but the reality is; it is going to change. There are just too many heavy hitters trying to make it happen. Now the way I see it, the best way to keep the upgrade flow going, is to make it so that 80% can go ahead and retire without a penalty. This seems to the direction ALPA is heading.

Doesn't matter what most "say".... they ARE staying. Look at the list of those that turned 60..... almost all have stayed.

FLMD11CAPT 05-28-2007 03:44 AM

There are several of the over 60 crowd who have been jumping up and down on their buddies un Managment's desks to try and postpone any bid until after the 60 legislation/ruling takes effect. This is because they have to have Capt. "slots" to bid into (its not automatic like going to the back seat). As large bids happen only every 18-30 months having this next bid prior to the issuance would time many of them out as they near 65.

md11phlyer 05-28-2007 07:25 AM

4700 sacrificed for the good of a few. I hope I get the same representation some day.

Check 6 05-28-2007 10:31 AM

Flew with a 59 1/2 Capt recently. While sitting in LAX, him and a buddy were talking about how they can't wait to stay on so they could buy this or that toy.... the buddy was a 10 S/O...

Really really hard not to chime in....

damn

frozenboxhauler 05-28-2007 10:40 AM

[QUOTE=matty;171531]

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r (Post 171474)


Isn't it because of ALPA that probation even exists at FedEx? I have heard that probation didn't even exist before the latest round of ALPA.

We were ALWAYS on probation prior to ALPA (1).
fbh


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:01 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands