December Bidpacks Delayed
11-08-2007 | 03:14 PM
#12
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Delayed due to huge number of disputed pairings 
From Vic Liberti
The situation is so bad now that the SIG initially disputed 114 MEM MD11 lines for December! Let me repeat that -114 lines! The Company agreed to fix some of them, and some further compromises may be achieved as time goes on. But nevertheless, whatever the eventual outcome (and I'm sure the Company will do some fancy footwork to keep this information from surfacing), this should be a clear wakeup call to all as to what is transpiring and unchecked, what can happen in the future.
From Vic Liberti
The situation is so bad now that the SIG initially disputed 114 MEM MD11 lines for December! Let me repeat that -114 lines! The Company agreed to fix some of them, and some further compromises may be achieved as time goes on. But nevertheless, whatever the eventual outcome (and I'm sure the Company will do some fancy footwork to keep this information from surfacing), this should be a clear wakeup call to all as to what is transpiring and unchecked, what can happen in the future.
11-08-2007 | 05:03 PM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: B-777 Captain
Delayed due to huge number of disputed pairings
From Vic Liberti
The situation is so bad now that the SIG initially disputed 114 MEM MD11 lines for December! Let me repeat that -114 lines! The Company agreed to fix some of them, and some further compromises may be achieved as time goes on. But nevertheless, whatever the eventual outcome (and I'm sure the Company will do some fancy footwork to keep this information from surfacing), this should be a clear wakeup call to all as to what is transpiring and unchecked, what can happen in the future.
From Vic Liberti
The situation is so bad now that the SIG initially disputed 114 MEM MD11 lines for December! Let me repeat that -114 lines! The Company agreed to fix some of them, and some further compromises may be achieved as time goes on. But nevertheless, whatever the eventual outcome (and I'm sure the Company will do some fancy footwork to keep this information from surfacing), this should be a clear wakeup call to all as to what is transpiring and unchecked, what can happen in the future.
11-08-2007 | 06:17 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: FDX MD11 FO
Lines vs Pairings?
Was that 114 lines disputed or 114 pairings disputed? Just wondering....I thought the SIG only disputed pairings. Either way that's a lot...we just need to not fly them once they go into open time.
11-08-2007 | 09:27 PM
#18
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Pairings are disputed - NOT lines. The PSIT builds most of the lines from the remaining POS pairings that have been through the optimizer and didn't survive the dispute process. All the disputed pairings are set aside during the build and dumped into open time prior to the view/add window.
11-09-2007 | 06:03 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: A300 Capt
Block display
The block displays for December are in the computer.
i.e., Block xx for Airbus MEM Dec07 may be viewed in VIPS. Some of the SIBA lines show 4 digit pairing numbers. Hopefully FastBid will work!
i.e., Block xx for Airbus MEM Dec07 may be viewed in VIPS. Some of the SIBA lines show 4 digit pairing numbers. Hopefully FastBid will work!
11-09-2007 | 06:24 AM
#20
Beverage Consultant
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Bartender & cabana boy
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Atrain77
Flight Schools and Training
10
02-09-2006 02:11 PM
