Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS and FDX, age 65 may get more complicated >

UPS and FDX, age 65 may get more complicated


Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS and FDX, age 65 may get more complicated

Old 12-28-2007 | 12:41 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: MD11 FO
Default UPS and FDX, age 65 may get more complicated

I saw this on another forum. It appears the Senior Pilots Coalition is going to challenge HR 4343 in court. Read the following from age60rule.com:

http://www.age60rule.com/docs/12-21-...C%20UPDATE.pdf
Reply
Old 12-28-2007 | 03:48 PM
  #2  
Freightpuppy's Avatar
Freightmama!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

I'm slow today....

What's their beef with it?
Reply
Old 12-28-2007 | 04:03 PM
  #3  
Pilot7576's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: 757 Capt
Default age 65

Guys (and you too freightpooch)...

I think if this group is successful in overturning the bill and providing retroactivity for over 60 as of nov 2006, it will have no effect whatsoever on ups and fdx. No one at either ups or federal has been forced to retire at 60...they migrated to the back seat. If they did retire, it was voluntary on their part. If someone took early retirement at 55, would we expect to have them be able to return to the left seat as well??

JMO

Pilot7576
Reply
Old 12-28-2007 | 04:10 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Default

True to form--they're trying to overturn it because they want age 65 to be retroactive to Nov. 2006, when the ICAO changed the age to 65.

Can't these guys just retire and give it up? When will the quit? Age 90?
Reply
Old 12-28-2007 | 09:07 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: A cushion seat
Default

How stupid!! How much more MONEY do you guys need?? You got to stay longer in the front seat. You get to come back if you are in the back seat. So what more do you want?????

A 4 day weekend pass to the Payboy Manson??

No, wait.......thats what I want.
Reply
Old 12-28-2007 | 09:57 PM
  #6  
Freightpuppy's Avatar
Freightmama!
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

Well, since they are all saying the anti 65 crowd "just needs to 'deal with it'", why don't they just take what just got and "deal with it"? Sheesh! Some people just don't know when to give it up.
Reply
Old 12-28-2007 | 10:49 PM
  #7  
Vman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: 1 ft out the door
Default

My ten year old son could have written a letter with more clarity and purpose than the SPC letter...
Reply
Old 12-29-2007 | 12:24 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: B-757, B-767 F/O
Default

Reply
Old 12-29-2007 | 03:53 AM
  #9  
FreightDawgyDog's Avatar
Trust but Verify!!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
From: MD11 CRA
Default

"How stupid!! How much more MONEY do you guys need?? You got to stay longer in the front seat. You get to come back if you are in the back seat. So what more do you want????? "

C'mon now let's be fair. These poor fellows wasted the best flying years of their lives suing everyone so they can fly longer and all those lawsuits probably broke them. Now they need to fly longer than 65 so they can pay of their lawyers. What a bunch of maroons. Maybe now Congress will see just what a bunch of spoiled children these losers are.
Reply
Old 12-29-2007 | 04:12 AM
  #10  
Toccata's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
From: DC10 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by nicholasblonde
True to form--they're trying to overturn it because they want age 65 to be retroactive to Nov. 2006, when the ICAO changed the age to 65.

Can't these guys just retire and give it up? When will the quit? Age 90?
Actually, after reading the letter, I thought their concern was the wording prohibiting "...their constitutional right to the judicial system." against "... air carriers and their allies."

I think the concern is about the clause trying to prevent lawsuits against the various participants and supporters of this piece of legislation. I believe that would include those with a seat at the table.

I'm certainly not an expert - but I bet that if some of the lawyers in congress/senate actually had read the resolution, they would not have voted for it. "What do you mean they can't sue someone!!! By gosh, that's their God-given right!!! This is America"
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jabroni45
Cargo
24
12-17-2007 03:22 PM
767pilot
Cargo
53
09-28-2007 05:50 AM
PurpleTail
Cargo
36
08-27-2007 09:14 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
02-16-2006 10:09 AM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices