Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Porked away NAT line check >

FDX - Porked away NAT line check

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Porked away NAT line check

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-07-2008, 08:38 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default FDX - Porked away NAT line check

Fellow Maddog Fedex dudes. I’ve had a couple of cocktails and I’m posting. Probably not a good idea but that’s the way it is. I know most of us are top notch drivers that do the job right. I really hope the tools that caused the recent emails from standards are on this forum and get to see this post. If so, here’s to you – toolbags.

Thanks to you - the 1% idiots for the latest “war & peace” emails (x2) from the MD-11 standards gurus. ***!!! Now we get to deal with extra procedures and additional FAA scrutiny on line checks because you fools are too lazy to do your job properly. I like flying international but I can’t hold it on a regular basis. I’ll be glad to handle your cherry Europe trip if you’re too incompetent to get there without a GNE or inability to pass a line check over the North Atlantic.

This job has its challenges but give me a break. You idiots are making it wayyyyyy harder than it needs to be. Gander tells you to cross 50W at FL290 and you’re at FL330 – you f--king do it. I would have loved to be a fly on the wall on that flight deck during the line check. “Hey, dude, do you think the jet is going to descend to make the restriction? Boy, I hope so. What should we do if it doesn’t start down. Jeez, we’re only 10 mile from the point we’re supposed to be at 290, the jet is still at 330, what should we do? ***!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Pathetic!!! Where do we get these idiots???

I don’t care if you “fessed up” or not. You guys are tools and you have no business flying around TN never mind crossing the North Atlantic.
Rant over.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 08:41 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 43
Thumbs up

Tell it like it is.
Good 7 is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 08:45 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 424
Default

Adler,

I think you have had too many cocktails. We all have screwed up, and most of us were lucky enough for it not to happen on a line check. If you are that good, you won't mind the extra scrutiny. Look at it as another chance to succeed....
nightfreight is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 09:00 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by nightfreight View Post
If you are that good, you won't mind the extra scrutiny. Look at it as another chance to succeed....
Bring it on. I've yet to stumble on a check ride in 20 years. I just have a hard time believing that we have folks who rise to such a level of incompetence.

As I said, I’d be glad to fly their trips – line check or not.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 09:14 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
angry tanker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 390
Default

You know, we did this all to oursleves. They are sending the f/o's on international experience during ioe to hawaii. let's see, they fly on the same flight plan as filed, no changes, no hf position report...wham bam thank you ma'am. come on really. i am an af dork, but i have spent time teaching students on oceanic procedures. fedex hasn't taught sheet. good luck to the non-military, or even non heavies dudes.
angry tanker is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 09:27 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by angry tanker View Post
You know, we did this all to oursleves. They are sending the f/o's on international experience during ioe to hawaii. let's see, they fly on the same flight plan as filed, no changes, no hf position report...wham bam thank you ma'am. come on really. i am an af dork, but i have spent time teaching students on oceanic procedures. fedex hasn't taught sheet. good luck to the non-military, or even non heavies dudes.
I'd be willing to cut some slack if the problem on this line check had been unique to class-2 nav procedures or flying in the NAT tracks (in light of the flawed IOE scheduling you pointed out). However, this was a basic situation anyone could have encountered over the U.S. ATC tells you to cross a point at an altitude. Automation is nice but you need to make sure the jet does what it is supposed to do.

One other pet peeve. I'm continually amazed at the guys in the left seat of the MD-11 who choose to fly around with their hands in their lap with the AP on. We're below 3K' getting vectored to final or actually on final and they're still closer to jacking off than flying the jet. Good grief!! It sure would be nice if they even pretended to be flying the jet instead of along for the ride. Good night all - maybe I'll be in a better mood tomorrow - !hic!
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 09:42 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Deuce130's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 931
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
I'd be willing to cut some slack if the problem on this line check had been unique to class-2 nav procedures or flying in the NAT tracks (in light of the flawed IOE scheduling you pointed out). However, this was a basic situation anyone could have encountered over the U.S. ATC tells you to cross a point at an altitude. Automation is nice but you need to make sure the jet does what it is supposed to do.

One other pet peeve. I'm continually amazed at the guys in the left seat of the MD-11 who choose to fly around with their hands in their lap with the AP on. We're below 3K' getting vectored to final or actually on final and they're still closer to jacking off than flying the jet. Good grief!! It sure would be nice if they even pretended to be flying the jet instead of along for the ride. Good night all - maybe I'll be in a better mood tomorrow - !hic!
I hope so. You're not sounding really great right now. IMHO.
Deuce130 is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 09:48 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jagplt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 777 Multi-tasker
Posts: 712
Default

anything happen to the LCA?
jagplt is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 10:08 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USNFDX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD10 FO
Posts: 307
Default

Could've happened to anybody. I've been on this jet for 3 yrs. Currently flying with an LCA. We talked about what happen. Apparently prof does not work when making a relatively small descent in cruise. He even demoed it for me. That's the first I had ever heard that.

It is a training issue relative to our scope of operations. I have not done a NAT in over 15 months. When was the last time you were in Almaty? We go into so many places around the world and domestically, hard to be on top of everything.

Domestic Flag carriers on the 777 or 747 might go to 6-7 cities. What do we have 50 cities in our bid pack?
USNFDX is offline  
Old 02-07-2008, 10:09 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fr8av8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Chemtrailing since 1981
Posts: 181
Default

Originally Posted by jagplt View Post
anything happen to the LCA?
THAT...is the right question! What about an LCA that didn't intervene soon enough to prevent the violation/altitude deviation? Is he busted too? Also, if the F/O's just suddenly became NOQ, then you haven't got the correct number of qualified crew members to complete the flight.... I could be wrong......
fr8av8r is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dadof6
Cargo
16
01-30-2008 06:56 AM
MD11Fr8Dog
Cargo
54
12-30-2007 12:24 AM
fdxflyer
Cargo
14
12-22-2007 08:43 AM
magic rat
Cargo
14
12-15-2007 11:25 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices