FDX - Enhancements to LOA
06-04-2008 | 03:47 PM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 1
LOA I was part of why I ran for block rep. LOA II was simply the memorializing of the the FCIFs.
I was against the first LOA. I am voting for LOA II. Why? It helps the dudes who are going there, and it firms up those enhancements so they cannot be taken away at a whim. If the crew force wanted it previously, why NOT offer the improvements up to them as well?
You got a vote...do as you see fit. This one didn't cost us anything. It is hard for me to gather much indignation about LOA II when the weaker LOA I was voted for by 68% of the crew force. I am hearing a lot of spears thrown at Fred about LOA II. Dudes...the LOA is the reason Fred and I are here... If you think there is a lot of leverage to garner improvements, however, after you just signed off on the previous LOA by that kind of margin I think you are mistaken.
The excess bid, not the LOA, will probably be the main factor in more guys going to HKG voluntarily. I'm for anything that helps them out at all. This LOA II helps...a little. I'm not here to sell it to you however--make your own choices.
I was against the first LOA. I am voting for LOA II. Why? It helps the dudes who are going there, and it firms up those enhancements so they cannot be taken away at a whim. If the crew force wanted it previously, why NOT offer the improvements up to them as well?
You got a vote...do as you see fit. This one didn't cost us anything. It is hard for me to gather much indignation about LOA II when the weaker LOA I was voted for by 68% of the crew force. I am hearing a lot of spears thrown at Fred about LOA II. Dudes...the LOA is the reason Fred and I are here... If you think there is a lot of leverage to garner improvements, however, after you just signed off on the previous LOA by that kind of margin I think you are mistaken.
The excess bid, not the LOA, will probably be the main factor in more guys going to HKG voluntarily. I'm for anything that helps them out at all. This LOA II helps...a little. I'm not here to sell it to you however--make your own choices.
06-04-2008 | 03:57 PM
#13
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: 757 Captain
06-04-2008 | 04:07 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
From: 777 Multi-tasker
06-04-2008 | 04:12 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
LOA I was part of why I ran for block rep. LOA II was simply the memorializing of the the FCIFs.
I was against the first LOA. I am voting for LOA II. Why? It helps the dudes who are going there, and it firms up those enhancements so they cannot be taken away at a whim. If the crew force wanted it previously, why NOT offer the improvements up to them as well?
You got a vote...do as you see fit. This one didn't cost us anything. It is hard for me to gather much indignation about LOA II when the weaker LOA I was voted for by 68% of the crew force. I am hearing a lot of spears thrown at Fred about LOA II. Dudes...the LOA is the reason Fred and I are here... If you think there is a lot of leverage to garner improvements, however, after you just signed off on the previous LOA by that kind of margin I think you are mistaken.
Roger that. DW's big sales pitch to the crew force that "would not be affected by it" killed us. Of course we vote yes on this, but the whole thing is a joke.
The excess bid, not the LOA, will probably be the main factor in more guys going to HKG voluntarily. I'm for anything that helps them out at all. This LOA II helps...a little. I'm not here to sell it to you however--make your own choices.
I was against the first LOA. I am voting for LOA II. Why? It helps the dudes who are going there, and it firms up those enhancements so they cannot be taken away at a whim. If the crew force wanted it previously, why NOT offer the improvements up to them as well?
You got a vote...do as you see fit. This one didn't cost us anything. It is hard for me to gather much indignation about LOA II when the weaker LOA I was voted for by 68% of the crew force. I am hearing a lot of spears thrown at Fred about LOA II. Dudes...the LOA is the reason Fred and I are here... If you think there is a lot of leverage to garner improvements, however, after you just signed off on the previous LOA by that kind of margin I think you are mistaken.
Roger that. DW's big sales pitch to the crew force that "would not be affected by it" killed us. Of course we vote yes on this, but the whole thing is a joke.
The excess bid, not the LOA, will probably be the main factor in more guys going to HKG voluntarily. I'm for anything that helps them out at all. This LOA II helps...a little. I'm not here to sell it to you however--make your own choices.
06-04-2008 | 04:16 PM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
I agree ... Albie's our APC block rep. So far ... he's turned out to be a pretty good sh*t. If you question his motivation, please email or call or meet him for lunch. He seems to be a straight shooter and a good rep.
Thanks Albie ...
Mark
06-04-2008 | 04:20 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
LOA I was part of why I ran for block rep. LOA II was simply the memorializing of the the FCIFs.
I was against the first LOA. I am voting for LOA II. Why? It helps the dudes who are going there, and it firms up those enhancements so they cannot be taken away at a whim. If the crew force wanted it previously, why NOT offer the improvements up to them as well?
You got a vote...do as you see fit. This one didn't cost us anything. It is hard for me to gather much indignation about LOA II when the weaker LOA I was voted for by 68% of the crew force. I am hearing a lot of spears thrown at Fred about LOA II. Dudes...the LOA is the reason Fred and I are here... If you think there is a lot of leverage to garner improvements, however, after you just signed off on the previous LOA by that kind of margin I think you are mistaken.
The excess bid, not the LOA, will probably be the main factor in more guys going to HKG voluntarily. I'm for anything that helps them out at all. This LOA II helps...a little. I'm not here to sell it to you however--make your own choices.
I was against the first LOA. I am voting for LOA II. Why? It helps the dudes who are going there, and it firms up those enhancements so they cannot be taken away at a whim. If the crew force wanted it previously, why NOT offer the improvements up to them as well?
You got a vote...do as you see fit. This one didn't cost us anything. It is hard for me to gather much indignation about LOA II when the weaker LOA I was voted for by 68% of the crew force. I am hearing a lot of spears thrown at Fred about LOA II. Dudes...the LOA is the reason Fred and I are here... If you think there is a lot of leverage to garner improvements, however, after you just signed off on the previous LOA by that kind of margin I think you are mistaken.
The excess bid, not the LOA, will probably be the main factor in more guys going to HKG voluntarily. I'm for anything that helps them out at all. This LOA II helps...a little. I'm not here to sell it to you however--make your own choices.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
