FDX - Sharing the pain
06-10-2008, 12:37 PM
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Originally Posted by Chainsaw
Z
Carryover is causing a paycut for the entire crewforce? Hmm.. Plus, don't think I got a vote on the age 65 issue either, not a contractual issue. Nice try though, you just needed some accountability and reason on the follow through.
Carryover is causing a paycut for the entire crewforce? Hmm.. Plus, don't think I got a vote on the age 65 issue either, not a contractual issue. Nice try though, you just needed some accountability and reason on the follow through.
06-10-2008, 12:40 PM
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 117
Originally Posted by Chainsaw
Z
Carryover is causing a paycut for the entire crewforce? Hmm.. Plus, don't think I got a vote on the age 65 issue either, not a contractual issue. Nice try though, you just needed some accountability and reason on the follow through.
Carryover is causing a paycut for the entire crewforce? Hmm.. Plus, don't think I got a vote on the age 65 issue either, not a contractual issue. Nice try though, you just needed some accountability and reason on the follow through.
For example.
LAX F/O: Avg BLG 69:51. There are 50 lines with total carryover of 572+45. Not counting secondary or reserve lines. But just looking at the lines. If they accounted it into BLG that would rasie the AVg BLG to over 80, or keeping the same BLG it would force them to create 8 more lines (ie the necessity for more pilots).
I realize the necessity for carryover in international flying. However there are numeroues lines above 40 hours and three above 60 hours. That is excessive.
Last edited by mrzog2138; 06-10-2008 at 01:02 PM.
06-10-2008, 02:36 PM
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: I never did mind the little things.......
Posts: 260
Swing and a Miss
Originally Posted by DiamondZ
No confusion. Just irony.
Apples and Oranges. Do the words "Out of Context" mean anything to you?
Last edited by Chainsaw; 06-10-2008 at 02:36 PM. Reason: type
06-10-2008, 03:30 PM
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: I never did mind the little things.......
Posts: 260
?
Originally Posted by DiamondZ
Oh, I get it...
Bottom Line* vs Bottom Line
* = Soap Box / Preacher Box
Bottom Line* vs Bottom Line
* = Soap Box / Preacher Box
In any debate the first response of a weak position is oversimplification. I realize that some people sleep better at night with a “one size fits all” paradigm. Nighty-night.
What's a preacher box anyway? Nevermind, I don't care.....
06-10-2008, 03:36 PM
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Posts: 489
Originally Posted by Chainsaw
No you don't get it. The FAA changing federal regulations is not equivalent to Section Four of the CBA. All issues are not equal or controllable. I love the bold mental stroke of boiling all discussions down to “the bottom line”. Astounding, I stand in awe.
In any debate the first response of a weak position is oversimplification. I realize that some people sleep better at night with a “one size fits all” paradigm. Nighty-night.
What's a preacher box anyway? Nevermind, I don't care.....
In any debate the first response of a weak position is oversimplification. I realize that some people sleep better at night with a “one size fits all” paradigm. Nighty-night.
What's a preacher box anyway? Nevermind, I don't care.....
Did you vote for the seniority system?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
