Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX - Sharing the pain >

FDX - Sharing the pain

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX - Sharing the pain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2008, 10:42 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jagplt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 777 Multi-tasker
Posts: 712
Default FDX - Sharing the pain

I think we need to discuss how the system currently works, and how we can make a few tweaks or adjustments that make it more equal for all in the pain sharing department.

This thread is driven by looking at a few calendars while checking on individual trips. With some of the guys, I can see why they block their calendars.

I'll note a few examples and we can banter about the pro's and con's of the current system and how we can correct some of the more flagrant examples of the lack of system fairness. These examples work in either seat, probably on all airplanes.

Let's say an airbus Capt, bid's a reserve line that has 15 day's of reserve carryover, and protects it with another 15 day's of reserve. That's 30 day's of reserve in a row. Does this most every month except when he's flying siba. In this particular example he hasn't turned a wheel in 2 months. Quite lucrative and legal. But what does that do to the overall picture? Why do we have reserve lines with 15 day's of carryover? Is it really necessary, or just a way for the company to get 15 more day's for straight time?

In example 2 an 11 Capt has 8 day's reserve carryover, 10 day's off and the rest of the month on reserve again. During that 10 day's off he picks up a 77 hour trip out of open time. Again, working 30 day's in a row, again legal.

In both cases these individuals have CH's of 140 to 160. There will be those who say I'm glad we can make extra when we want to... yes 5 years ago that wouldn't have had much effect on the system, but what about now. Senior guy's flying max CH's, 100+, while junior guys struggling with 68 hours and facing downgrades and maybe worse.

This isn't the same airline that supported this kind of inequity. It worked years ago, but the system is dividing the crew force now and seems out of control. I'm sure there are other examples, share them with us, then we can address the issue...

How do we share the pain?
jagplt is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 12:00 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 829
Default

Unfortunately, many in our "union" do not intend to share the pain, they would just as well see the junior guys get furloughed to protect their ability to bid carryover. Of course, had FedEx been potentially close to furlough when they were junior, they would have cried foul with the best of them. The whole concept of the union escapes them, unity in the good times (for contract negotiations, etc) requires unity in the bad times. Junior guys have long memories, too.
LivingInMEM is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 12:12 PM
  #3  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

How does the saying go? "Be nice to the junior guys because they will be senior to you at your next airline."
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 12:45 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 540
Default

Originally Posted by RJtrashPilot View Post
How does the saying go? "Be nice to the junior guys because they will be senior to you at your next airline."
Yes, but actions speak louder than words. It's all about ME ME ME (or so I've seen).

Biff
low seniority F/E
bifff15 is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 12:52 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 398
Default

I flew with a WB captain, who is married to another FedEx WB captain. Thought it was "unfair" that they made 6 credit hours less a month (68 instead of the old 74) because the company refused to furlough. Said it was all about their seniority, and that they had put in their time here, and deserved their full paycheck.

Yep, would rather see guys on the street than make about $1380 less a month.
Fedex999999 is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 01:02 PM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by Fedex999999 View Post
I flew with a WB captain, who is married to another FedEx WB captain. Thought it was "unfair" that they made 6 credit hours less a month (68 instead of the old 74) because the company refused to furlough. Said it was all about their seniority, and that they had put in their time here, and deserved their full paycheck.

Yep, would rather see guys on the street than make about $1380 less a month.
I gotta wonder if this couple would have felt the same way if the shoe was on the other foot when they were junior (in the name of fairness and seniority). Somehow, I doubt it...
Balut is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 01:49 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by Fedex999999 View Post
I flew with a WB captain, who is married to another FedEx WB captain. Thought it was "unfair" that they made 6 credit hours less a month (68 instead of the old 74) because the company refused to furlough. Said it was all about their seniority, and that they had put in their time here, and deserved their full paycheck.

Yep, would rather see guys on the street than make about $1380 less a month.
These people need to be shot in the face. It is imperative that we stand up to these a-holes. It may not change the net result, but I'll be damned if I listen to their drivel.
SuperMario is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 02:18 PM
  #8  
Ready for a nap
 
v1 uh-oh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: md11
Posts: 223
Default

how 'bout some inits and airplane , so we can know who these pieces of $(:/ are.

7/32/ and yet another NO
v1 uh-oh is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 02:24 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Take a good look at the Airbus and Boeing bid packs. Carryover is minimized. BLG is low. All three airframes have lines less than 68 being "bought up" to 68.

I say the schedule is already made to maximize the number of lines. Folks here awhile remember the BLGs at 74. In a way, the pain is being shared. I am surprised the big domestic carryover trips have gone away. You don't see the runaway credit hours on senior folks lines now.
Gunter is offline  
Old 06-07-2008, 04:02 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
jagplt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 777 Multi-tasker
Posts: 712
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter View Post
Take a good look at the Airbus and Boeing bid packs. Carryover is minimized. BLG is low. All three airframes have lines less than 68 being "bought up" to 68.

I say the schedule is already made to maximize the number of lines. Folks here awhile remember the BLGs at 74. In a way, the pain is being shared. I am surprised the big domestic carryover trips have gone away. You don't see the runaway credit hours on senior folks lines now.
mmmmm.. not quite right. You need to look at some of the schedules and see what some of the guys are flying. PM me if you need speicific examples. Some guy's are working 30 day's a month.
jagplt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hamfisted
Cargo
52
06-22-2008 09:19 PM
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM
skeebo2
Cargo
147
01-01-2008 10:24 PM
fdxflyer
Cargo
14
12-22-2007 08:43 AM
angry tanker
Cargo
20
07-10-2007 03:31 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices