Airline Pilot Central Forums
Page 2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   Does Carry over reduce RSV line value? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/35522-does-carry-over-reduce-rsv-line-value.html)

FDXLAG 01-09-2009 06:45 PM
Originally Posted by PastV1 (Post 534650)
WOW, I never would have known that......
No doubt why else would you write "C/O has no impact on RLG or BLG"

PastV1 01-09-2009 09:57 PM
Originally Posted by FDXLAG (Post 534752)
No doubt why else would you write "C/O has no impact on RLG or BLG"
Because it doesn't oh wise one....

FDXLAG 01-09-2009 11:33 PM
Originally Posted by PastV1 (Post 534824)
Because it doesn't oh wise one....

Is this a trick question, like what is black and white and used to be read all over?

So when does C/O not help the company by flying extra time at straight pay, helping them to claim we have to many pilots, and allowing them to take trips out of the next months bid pack?

PastV1 01-10-2009 06:20 AM
Originally Posted by FDXLAG (Post 534834)
Is this a trick question, like what is black and white and used to be read all over?

So when does C/O not help the company by flying extra time at straight pay, helping them to claim we have to many pilots, and allowing them to take trips out of the next months bid pack?
It's a simple question. The title of Gunter's thread was "Does C/O reduce RSV line value" The straight forward and factual answer is what I posted in the context that I took his question. RLG is 96% of BLG. C/O has no value in RLG or BLG.

Take your blinders off and RTFQ before you bring up all the other issues with C/O. Never said a word about it other than the definition of RLG.

If they took those hours and put them into a line it would be calculated as BLG. So I guess it's not C/O anymore then is it? So, just so you understand, C/O has nothing to do with BLG or RLG calculations.

P.S. GUnter even clarified his question and I agreed with him...

Gunter 01-10-2009 06:24 AM
Sorry about the confusing thread title.

My contention is CO has a very real effect on line averages when you look at more than one month at a time.

After CO is reduce in the first month subsequent months see a positive effect.

PastV1 01-10-2009 06:27 AM
Originally Posted by Gunter (Post 534899)
Sorry about the confusing thread title.

My contention is CO has a very real effect on line averages when you look at more than one month at a time.
No worries Gunter. Figured out what you mean... Some others could not distinguish the question/answer thing... :)

Kinda like the shoot first, aim later type of thinking.

fedupbusdriver 01-10-2009 06:37 AM
Gunter, it's kind of hard to tell. If the company used the c/o to bulk up line values, then it would affect RLG, but if they used the c/o to build more lines with similar BLG's, or to fill VTO's, then it would not affect RLG.

Gunter 01-10-2009 07:02 AM
Excessive carryover also steals hrs away from the next month.

With 4a2b in effect, the company sees a benefit from actually increasing carryover.

They will also abuse the allowable 13 spread. The spread could be held much tighter.

Single departures need to be smaller or the spread needs to be tighter. Just put that in the same category as no early retirment packages or monthly caps on credit hrs.

FDXLAG 01-10-2009 07:14 AM
Originally Posted by PastV1 (Post 534895)
It's a simple question. The title of Gunter's thread was "Does C/O reduce RSV line value" The straight forward and factual answer is what I posted in the context that I took his question. RLG is 96% of BLG. C/O has no value in RLG or BLG.

Take your blinders off and RTFQ before you bring up all the other issues with C/O. Never said a word about it other than the definition of RLG.

If they took those hours and put them into a line it would be calculated as BLG. So I guess it's not C/O anymore then is it? So, just so you understand, C/O has nothing to do with BLG or RLG calculations.

P.S. GUnter even clarified his question and I agreed with him...
I read the question and C/O has a direct influence on BLG. If you take those hours out of this months bid pack and put them in the next months bidpack the BLG for the next month goes up. If BLG for next month is higher RLG for next month is higher. Let us look at the question again "Does C/O reduce RSV line value" I say it does.

But my comments only concerned your statement "C/O has no impact on RLG or BLG". You really think it doesn't O wise one?

FDXLAG 01-10-2009 07:16 AM
Originally Posted by fedupbusdriver (Post 534909)
Gunter, it's kind of hard to tell. If the company used the c/o to bulk up line values, then it would affect RLG, but if they used the c/o to build more lines with similar BLG's, or to fill VTO's, then it would not affect RLG.
Is not either option good for the whole crew force?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM.
Page 2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands