|
Originally Posted by Gunter
(Post 534899)
Sorry about the confusing thread title.
(Deleted by V1) My contention is CO has a very real effect on line averages when you look at more than one month at a time. (Deleted by V1 out) After CO is reduce in the first month subsequent months see a positive effect.
Originally Posted by PastV1
(Post 534903)
No worries Gunter. Figured out what you mean... Some others could not distinguish the question/answer thing... :)
Kinda like the shoot first, aim later type of thinking. |
Hey!! I've got an idea...
How about we leave it as carryover might possibly have an effect on RLG. But, only if they used it to increase line values, rather than build more lines. Otherwise, it would have no effect on RLG. :p That way, we can all think you are both wrong. |
Originally Posted by Busboy
(Post 534941)
Hey!! I've got an idea...
How about we leave it as carryover might possibly have an effect on RLG. But, only if they used it to increase line values, rather than build more lines. Otherwise, it would have no effect on RLG. :p That way, we can all think you are both wrong. So just a question. If we land the international mail contract would they use the extra trips to increase BLG or add more lines? And if they are just going to add more lines is that bad? |
I prefer to think we are all correct and the company is wrong.
|
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 534943)
So just a question. If we land the international mail contract would they use the extra trips to increase BLG or add more lines? And if they are just going to add more lines is that bad?
|
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 534943)
So just a question. If we land the international mail contract would they use the extra trips to increase BLG or add more lines? And if they are just going to add more lines is that bad?
It gives them wide lattitude, so they think, to experiment with our lives, I mean lines. I don't think we have seen the final iteration just the first attempt. |
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 534935)
I read the question and C/O has a direct influence on BLG. If you take those hours out of this months bid pack and put them in the next months bidpack the BLG for the next month goes up. If BLG for next month is higher RLG for next month is higher. Let us look at the question again "Does C/O reduce RSV line value" I say it does.
But my comments only concerned your statement "C/O has no impact on RLG or BLG". You really think it doesn't O wise one? Not talking about what you can do with those hours. Just how RLG is determined. To simple a concept for you I guess. |
Originally Posted by PastV1
(Post 535219)
BLG is the average of the lines. RLG is 96% of that. Once lines are published C/O does not impact BLG.
Not talking about what you can do with those hours. Just how RLG is determined. To simple a concept for you I guess. Why don't we make all trips C/O, it wont affect BLG and there will be more flying for everyone. How's that for simple? |
Originally Posted by FDXLAG
(Post 535229)
Why don't we make all trips C/O, it wont affect BLG and there will be more flying for everyone.
How's that for simple? What a concept! Now, since everything is C/O how do you get your BLG average that is used to calculate RLG? Would RLG be 96% of BLG (Not including any C/O because we know that any C/O hrs are not used to get a BLG value)? This is fun now.... |
Why not go to 6 week months?
It's accounted for in the contract. It would kill a lot of CO. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:51 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands