Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Does Carry over reduce RSV line value? >

Does Carry over reduce RSV line value?


Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Does Carry over reduce RSV line value?

Old 01-10-2009 | 07:19 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Gunter
Sorry about the confusing thread title.

(Deleted by V1) My contention is CO has a very real effect on line averages when you look at more than one month at a time. (Deleted by V1 out)

After CO is reduce in the first month subsequent months see a positive effect.
Originally Posted by PastV1
No worries Gunter. Figured out what you mean... Some others could not distinguish the question/answer thing...

Kinda like the shoot first, aim later type of thinking.
WOW nice selective quote on gunter to make it look like you and he agree when it in fact just the opposite.
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 07:20 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
Default

Hey!! I've got an idea...

How about we leave it as carryover might possibly have an effect on RLG. But, only if they used it to increase line values, rather than build more lines. Otherwise, it would have no effect on RLG.


That way, we can all think you are both wrong.
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 07:24 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Busboy
Hey!! I've got an idea...

How about we leave it as carryover might possibly have an effect on RLG. But, only if they used it to increase line values, rather than build more lines. Otherwise, it would have no effect on RLG.


That way, we can all think you are both wrong.

So just a question. If we land the international mail contract would they use the extra trips to increase BLG or add more lines? And if they are just going to add more lines is that bad?
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 07:25 AM
  #24  
Gunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

I prefer to think we are all correct and the company is wrong.
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 07:26 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,184
Likes: 0
From: leaning to the left
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
So just a question. If we land the international mail contract would they use the extra trips to increase BLG or add more lines? And if they are just going to add more lines is that bad?
Yes. And, it depends on if they are carryover.
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 07:31 AM
  #26  
Gunter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
So just a question. If we land the international mail contract would they use the extra trips to increase BLG or add more lines? And if they are just going to add more lines is that bad?
The company is licking their chops over 4a2b.

It gives them wide lattitude, so they think, to experiment with our lives, I mean lines.

I don't think we have seen the final iteration just the first attempt.
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 02:51 PM
  #27  
PastV1's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: 11 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
I read the question and C/O has a direct influence on BLG. If you take those hours out of this months bid pack and put them in the next months bidpack the BLG for the next month goes up. If BLG for next month is higher RLG for next month is higher. Let us look at the question again "Does C/O reduce RSV line value" I say it does.

But my comments only concerned your statement "C/O has no impact on RLG or BLG". You really think it doesn't O wise one?
BLG is the average of the lines. RLG is 96% of that. Once lines are published C/O does not impact BLG.

Not talking about what you can do with those hours. Just how RLG is determined.

To simple a concept for you I guess.
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 03:10 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,047
Likes: 0
From: 767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by PastV1
BLG is the average of the lines. RLG is 96% of that. Once lines are published C/O does not impact BLG.

Not talking about what you can do with those hours. Just how RLG is determined.

To simple a concept for you I guess.

Why don't we make all trips C/O, it wont affect BLG and there will be more flying for everyone.

How's that for simple?
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 03:52 PM
  #29  
PastV1's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: 11 Capt
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG
Why don't we make all trips C/O, it wont affect BLG and there will be more flying for everyone.

How's that for simple?
That's great idea! We could all have a bunch of C/O and then the Company would not have any trips to build into the lines but we'd still get our new MBPG!

What a concept! Now, since everything is C/O how do you get your BLG average that is used to calculate RLG? Would RLG be 96% of BLG (Not including any C/O because we know that any C/O hrs are not used to get a BLG value)?


This is fun now....
Reply
Old 01-10-2009 | 04:06 PM
  #30  
R1200RT's Avatar
Living the dream!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Capt
Default

Why not go to 6 week months?

It's accounted for in the contract. It would kill a lot of CO.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
viperdriver
Cargo
24
08-18-2008 12:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices