Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

09-201 is out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2009, 03:29 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by TipTip35 View Post
... It appears to me that the bottom 100 guys are probably in the FE seat now (is that right Roberto?)...
Something like that, but instead of doing the counting, I'll wait for the Reference Seniority List which should come out tomorrow...
Roberto is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 03:31 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by nitefr8dog View Post
And 09-201 is what?
It's a vacancy bid which is followed by a displacement bid.

We get those once a year or so just so the training department can stay busy with new training events... We are creating jobs! It's the Brown version of a bailout package...
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 03:32 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by nitefr8dog View Post
And 09-201 is what?
The award from Displacement Bid 09-201. After a Realignment Vacancy Bid which had 46 CPT vacancies and 57 FO vacancies, there were 46 DC8 CPT, 7 ONT CPT, and 21 DC8 FO primary displacements, and too many to count secondary displacements.
Roberto is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 03:35 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by Roberto View Post
The award from Displacement Bid 09-201. There were 46 DC8 CPT, 7 ONT CPT, and 21 DC8 FO primary displacements, and too many to count secondary displacements.
Roberto did you get your CA seat? ...or did you decide to stay with an FO slot?
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 03:38 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE View Post
Roberto did you get your CA seat? ...or did you decide to stay with an FO slot?
Very senior SDFZ FO. Could have had ANC CPT.
Roberto is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 03:45 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Default

Originally Posted by Roberto View Post
Very senior SDFZ FO. Could have had ANC CPT.
Still against the Dec 13th legislation (as you know ) but I'm glad you got what you were hoping for...
⌐ AV8OR WANNABE is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 04:37 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tigerpilot1995's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SDF A300 FO
Posts: 441
Default

Originally Posted by nitefr8dog View Post
And 09-201 is what?
It is our fancy way of naming bids. Just a seat bid.
Tigerpilot1995 is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 05:02 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CheyDogFlies's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Kickin it "C"old School in AK
Posts: 283
Default

It's the bottom 69 in the FE seat now--#70 from the bottom in the company is now a 400 FO. Plus about 16 more who chose lower 48 displacement to FE vs an ANC FO commute. Then of course there are those that could have held FO in ANC but chose to stay in the FE seat. Clear as mud?

I counted 268 training events created by this displacement (minus whoever hasn't been out of their seat long enough for retraining). See y'all at the training center.
CheyDogFlies is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 05:24 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brownie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 757/767
Posts: 1,128
Default

Originally Posted by TipTip35 View Post
I'm sure I'll be corrected if my train of thinking is off but I really dont see what Brown has to lose by furloughing. It appears to me that the bottom 100 guys are probably in the FE seat now (is that right Roberto?). It also appears that the company has about 138 FEs now and only needs about 30-40 (based on DC8 CA and FO #s). That sounds to me like guarantee pay, healthcare, and benefits for about 100 guys that are sitting at home and going to have to be retrained at some point anyway. In addition what good are all those extra FEs if you cant pair them with CAs and FOs to build crews.

Basically, I dont think the whole "it takes two years to break even from a furlough" applies anymore. I think that applied before these last two bids went through and the bottom guys were spread out. Now that we have been reshuffled to put the bottom 100 in a seat where the company doesnt need them they have nothing to lose by sending out a 90 day notice tomorrow.

The only positive option I can think of is that they dont want to deal with an open time ban or how a furlough would appear to customers and investors so they decided to put us in the cheapest seat.

I hope I'm wrong and I'm not trying to be an alarmist. I'm part of that bottom 100 and it seems to me that we're costing them more to be on property than off...
I hate to be doom and gloom but customers don't care about furloghs as long as thier pkgs move on time, second talking about open time ban. What open time are you talking about, All they have to do is to continue building more vto lines like this past bid and it wipes out the whole open time.
brownie is offline  
Old 02-23-2009, 06:46 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by TipTip35 View Post
I'm sure I'll be corrected if my train of thinking is off but I really dont see what Brown has to lose by furloughing. It appears to me that the bottom 100 guys are probably in the FE seat now (is that right Roberto?). It also appears that the company has about 138 FEs now and only needs about 30-40 (based on DC8 CA and FO #s). That sounds to me like guarantee pay, healthcare, and benefits for about 100 guys that are sitting at home and going to have to be retrained at some point anyway. In addition what good are all those extra FEs if you cant pair them with CAs and FOs to build crews.

Basically, I dont think the whole "it takes two years to break even from a furlough" applies anymore. I think that applied before these last two bids went through and the bottom guys were spread out. Now that we have been reshuffled to put the bottom 100 in a seat where the company doesnt need them they have nothing to lose by sending out a 90 day notice tomorrow.

The only positive option I can think of is that they dont want to deal with an open time ban or how a furlough would appear to customers and investors so they decided to put us in the cheapest seat.

I hope I'm wrong and I'm not trying to be an alarmist. I'm part of that bottom 100 and it seems to me that we're costing them more to be on property than off...
We've always had a lot more FEs than Capts/FOs on the 727/DC-8. Carrying an excess of DC-8 FEs now is not that uncommon. The remaining PFE's and over 65 FEs are notoriously unresponsive on reserve and utilize their sick leave. I see your reasoning though.

I still say that 4/2/09 is the key date. A furlough will happen before then or not at all. I think the economy will turn by this summer and the company plans on using the DC-8 FEs to fill the vacancies created by the new 767s coming. We are working our tails off on the A300 with many lines well over 75 hours. They are attempting to do a lot more with less airplanes.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices