Quote:
I'm pretty sure this process, with respect to the 777 pay rates, is still ongoing.
Exactly. So, could a member of The Proponents of Hysteria please explain why we are crucifying guys who bid it?
Do any of us KNOW the details of the supposed "tentative agreement" on the 777 pay rates? or are we ASS-U-Me-ing (again) that it must be a secretly/outrageously/phenomenally good deal, or DW wouldn't be bidding it.
Has anyone here called and/or emailed anyone in the union to ask the question regarding the terms of the 777 TA?
or, is it just more fun to crucify DW or "outgoing block reps" that bid the 777 anonymously on this web forum? 'cause I'm down with that too.....let's just be honest about it......I enjoy reading an anonymous holier-than-thou crucifixion in writing with the best of 'em.
Maybe you should call him and ask him directly? It's rumored that he actually has an office phone (and email) that works, and he actually talks to people on it.
I don't know what the 777 deal is DW does. He has an advantage in figuring out if the 777 is a good deal or not. I think that smells.Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the "B-777 pay rate grievance" isn't a grievance at all - merely the process (outlined in our CBA - 26.K.) by which the company and the union agree on a pay rate for new aircraft.I'm pretty sure this process, with respect to the 777 pay rates, is still ongoing.
Exactly. So, could a member of The Proponents of Hysteria please explain why we are crucifying guys who bid it?
Do any of us KNOW the details of the supposed "tentative agreement" on the 777 pay rates? or are we ASS-U-Me-ing (again) that it must be a secretly/outrageously/phenomenally good deal, or DW wouldn't be bidding it.
Has anyone here called and/or emailed anyone in the union to ask the question regarding the terms of the 777 TA?
or, is it just more fun to crucify DW or "outgoing block reps" that bid the 777 anonymously on this web forum? 'cause I'm down with that too.....let's just be honest about it......I enjoy reading an anonymous holier-than-thou crucifixion in writing with the best of 'em.
Maybe you should call him and ask him directly? It's rumored that he actually has an office phone (and email) that works, and he actually talks to people on it.
My comment about the outgoing block rep E Mail was intended to show my displeasure with an outgoing block rep using union resources to (subtly) endorse the current block of MEC officers during an election cycle when 2 of the 3 are looking to "move up". Nothing wrong him with using his position to make the endorsement; nothing wrong with me chiding him for it.
As far as contacting DW, I heard he was unavailable in NZ. My personal opinion of who DW was looking out for did not change when I saw his name on the 777 list. I figured out who the last administration was looking out for after the over 53 veba details dribbled out, nothing since has changed that.