Search

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Rnav/gps/rnp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2009 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default Rnav/gps/rnp

What is the consensus among the cargo community? Are these in your eyes good, bad, or are you indifferent to them? Should the FAA be getting slammed right now for working too fast to add these? I am trying to get the pilots opinions on these systems for a term paper. Thanks!
Reply
Old 08-20-2009 | 04:37 PM
  #2  
MaydayMark's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,304
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

In between flying jobs (OK ... unemployed after my Legacy carrier went broke), I was employed as a GPS Flight Test Engineer. GPS is far superior to all previous navigation sources (the military version even more so). I'm glad we have it, the combined GPS/INS position information is a remarkable improvement in aviation.

For those that don't know, much of the EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE GPS system cost was justified by the cost savings of "standing down" the current aging (expensive maintenance) VOR, TACAN, NDB, ILS, OMEGA systems ...


Mark

Last edited by MaydayMark; 08-20-2009 at 06:06 PM.
Reply
Old 08-20-2009 | 05:06 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

I agree that turning off the non critical VORs (not sure what qualifies as a critical VOR though) will incur a significant savings. This comes in response to the following article FAA Criticized Over RNAV/RNP Strategy | AVIATION WEEK
Thanks for the input...lets get some more.
Reply
Old 08-20-2009 | 05:38 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 FO
Default

Originally Posted by imatworkallday
What is the consensus among the cargo community? Are these in your eyes good, bad, or are you indifferent to them? Should the FAA be getting slammed right now for working too fast to add these? I am trying to get the pilots opinions on these systems for a term paper. Thanks!
Why do you ask the same Q in several sections on site?
Reply
Old 08-20-2009 | 06:36 PM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s10an
Why do you ask the same Q in several sections on site?
Im trying to get as much feed back as possible. More exposure = More information = a better paper (at least that the theory)!
Reply
Old 08-20-2009 | 08:13 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by imatworkallday
What is the consensus among the cargo community? Are these in your eyes good, bad, or are you indifferent to them? Should the FAA be getting slammed right now for working too fast to add these? I am trying to get the pilots opinions on these systems for a term paper. Thanks!
They are part of the continuous improvement in navigation systems that have occurred since the beginning of aviation. Anything that improves accurracy and reliability is a good thing. Note: The FAA never moves to fast.
Reply
Old 08-21-2009 | 02:36 PM
  #7  
atpcliff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
From: Capt
Default

Hi!

I am upset with the glacially slow pace of FAA modernization, to include GPS approaches, ADS-B, better equipment for ATC, to include text communications vs. less voice communication.

cliff
NBO
Reply
Old 08-21-2009 | 04:02 PM
  #8  
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 66
From: Legacy FO
Default

Originally Posted by imatworkallday
Im trying to get as much feed back as possible. More exposure = More information = a better paper (at least that the theory)!
The problem is that the feedback you're getting isn't scientific. Additionally, you have no idea who is giving you the feedback. It could be your teacher for all you know who is giving you a bunch of nonsense.

I understand why you would field questions here; however, I really don't think it is going to be of much use. You aren't going to have any demographic information about your sources.

Go to the nearest crew layover hotel, meet the crew in the bar, and ask them nicely to fill out a simple survey.
Reply
Old 08-21-2009 | 04:50 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff
Hi!

I am upset with the glacially slow pace of FAA modernization, to include GPS approaches, ADS-B, better equipment for ATC, to include text communications vs. less voice communication.

cliff
NBO
I can certainly understand your being upset with the FAA for not speeding up the inclusion of GPS approaches. I mean after all, that DC-9 you're flying could certainly take full advantage of them.

JJ
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imatworkallday
Major
12
08-21-2009 09:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices