FDX - Disputed Pairings for Jan 2010
01-01-2010, 01:08 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,098
FDX - Disputed Pairings for Jan 2010
Excellent Job - all DP's in MEM filled...mostly by VTO volunteers (5 of 6 seats)
Last seat filled by FO after just one night of open time.
(p.s. the ONE DP in ANC for Jan is still open in both seats)
Does anyone even care any more?
Trip#13/12Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#21/19Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#282/26Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#53/26Jan10...ANC...11
Last seat filled by FO after just one night of open time.
(p.s. the ONE DP in ANC for Jan is still open in both seats)
Does anyone even care any more?
Trip#13/12Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#21/19Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#282/26Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#53/26Jan10...ANC...11
01-01-2010, 01:24 PM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: B-777
Posts: 455
Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
Excellent Job - all DP's in MEM filled...mostly by VTO volunteers (5 of 6 seats)
Last seat filled by FO after just one night of open time.
(p.s. the ONE DP in ANC for Jan is still open in both seats)
Does anyone even care any more?
Trip#13/12Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#21/19Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#282/26Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#53/26Jan10...ANC...11
Last seat filled by FO after just one night of open time.
(p.s. the ONE DP in ANC for Jan is still open in both seats)
Does anyone even care any more?
Trip#13/12Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#21/19Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#282/26Jan10...MEM...11 - filled
Trip#53/26Jan10...ANC...11
01-02-2010, 12:11 AM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: MD11 Kitchen Bi*ch
Posts: 263
People care, just not enough
And then the other issue in Mem-ville is that they don't have the self-policing notification system used with so much success in Anchorage. But, of course, for those that take these pairings, it really is all about them.
When both seats on a disputed pairing get picked up in the VTO process, that shows an attitude that, although they may pay their dues, they refuse to toe the line.
And then some wonder and fret over the contract.... why bother? With folks around to fly the cr_p trips that are rightfully disputed by the SIG, why should the company enter negotiations early. They have enough slugs to fly anything that they want to put together.
The only restriction is that it has to be a MEM pairing.
When both seats on a disputed pairing get picked up in the VTO process, that shows an attitude that, although they may pay their dues, they refuse to toe the line.
And then some wonder and fret over the contract.... why bother? With folks around to fly the cr_p trips that are rightfully disputed by the SIG, why should the company enter negotiations early. They have enough slugs to fly anything that they want to put together.
The only restriction is that it has to be a MEM pairing.
01-02-2010, 10:42 PM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: MD11 Kitchen Bi*ch
Posts: 263
Originally Posted by G Man
Hey let's stop flying carry over. That will show them. Maybe let's start with ANC based pilots first. Yeh.
G man
G man
01-02-2010, 11:46 PM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: ANC-Based MD-11 FO
Posts: 328
"Hey let's stop flying carry over. That will show them. Maybe let's start with ANC based pilots first. Yeh."
I know you're being cynical, but I'm so frustrated that ANC always takes it in the rear while MEM pulls in draft pay. My emotional side wants to say that I'll fly draft as much as possible during the next contract negotiation until MEM sets the example and stops working overtime at our expense.
I know you're being cynical, but I'm so frustrated that ANC always takes it in the rear while MEM pulls in draft pay. My emotional side wants to say that I'll fly draft as much as possible during the next contract negotiation until MEM sets the example and stops working overtime at our expense.
Last edited by FDXFLYR; 01-03-2010 at 01:15 PM.
01-03-2010, 05:47 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Originally Posted by ASpilot2be
What exactly is a disputed pairing? Google just sends me to these threads.
01-03-2010, 06:41 AM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD11 FO, ANC
Posts: 1,098
Originally Posted by FDXFLYR
"Hey let's stop flying carry over. That will show them. Maybe let's start with ANC based pilots first. Yeh."
I know you're being cynical, but I'm so frustrated that ANC always takes it in the rear while MEM pulls in draft pay. Me emotional side wants to say that I'll fly draft as much as possible during the next contract negotiation until MEM sets the example and stops working overtime at our expense.
I know you're being cynical, but I'm so frustrated that ANC always takes it in the rear while MEM pulls in draft pay. Me emotional side wants to say that I'll fly draft as much as possible during the next contract negotiation until MEM sets the example and stops working overtime at our expense.
Remember, when you point the finger, there's always several of your own pointing back at you.
So.....refocus.....this thread is about how no one seems to care about the Disputed Pairing process anymore.
01-03-2010, 07:35 AM
#10
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Originally Posted by AFW_MD11
There's been plenty of draft in ANC over the past few months - and, yes, even the exalted ANC FO's have been nuzzling up to the draft trough just as much as the MEM Bubbas.
Remember, when you point the finger, there's always several of your own pointing back at you.
So.....refocus.....this thread is about how no one seems to care about the Disputed Pairing process anymore.
Remember, when you point the finger, there's always several of your own pointing back at you.
So.....refocus.....this thread is about how no one seems to care about the Disputed Pairing process anymore.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
penguin22
Cargo
25
08-09-2008 03:40 AM
