Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX MD-10 2008 Incident at HOXIE >

FDX MD-10 2008 Incident at HOXIE

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX MD-10 2008 Incident at HOXIE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-30-2010, 05:30 PM
  #21  
Permanent Reserve
 
navigatro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,677
Default

It is a shame when people let pride and ego get in the way of learning and safety.
navigatro is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 05:32 PM
  #22  
Permanent Reserve
 
navigatro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,677
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
They told us what happened, how it happened and what to do about it. Unless you fly the MD-10-10, it's of little concern to you. It's no big secret but it's also something I wouldn't talk about on a public forum without permission, and I ain't gonna ask.

I have read the report, and I disagree completely.
navigatro is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 08:24 PM
  #23  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

Originally Posted by AerisArmis View Post
They told us what happened, how it happened and what to do about it. Unless you fly the MD-10-10, it's of little concern to you. It's no big secret but it's also something I wouldn't talk about on a public forum without permission, and I ain't gonna ask.
I'm glad you know so much about every other aircraft type out there that you conclusively know there would be nothing to benefit the rest of us simpletons from this event. Heaven forbid we might all learn a bit from this incident.

If it's no big secret, then why don't you share (in broad terms), what caused this event? You sir, are coming across as a grand champion tool bag.
bcrosier is offline  
Old 03-30-2010, 09:29 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FliFast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: I was acquired, Not Hired
Posts: 1,784
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok View Post
Yes, of course you're right. 1300 hours is indeed 1300 hours. And there certainly can't be much difference between C-172 time and F-18 (flying off of an aircraft carrier.) I'm sure any interview board would rate both guys about the same.
JJ
When I got hired across the street at Brown, I had 700 hours (mostly PIC time) of Cessna time (all types)...and I know I was lucky.

FF...the FLAP.
FliFast is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 03:06 AM
  #25  
A moment please...
Thread Starter
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 769
Default

So when you say you're "building time at UPS", you're not kidding! Had you been a UPS employee at a different job when you were hired? Either way, well done!
JetPiedmont is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 03:15 AM
  #26  
A moment please...
Thread Starter
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 769
Default

Originally Posted by bcrosier View Post
...Heaven forbid we might all learn a bit from this incident. ...If it's no big secret, then why don't you share (in broad terms), what caused this event?
I agree completely. As particular as the MD-10 and MD-11 is to fly, I would think any insights FDX was able to have from this rather disturbing incident would have been shared with other MD-10 and MD-11 operators, but doesn't seem to have been.
JetPiedmont is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 09:31 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Laughing_Jakal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,336
Default

Originally Posted by JetPiedmont View Post
I agree completely. As particular as the MD-10 and MD-11 is to fly, I would think any insights FDX was able to have from this rather disturbing incident would have been shared with other MD-10 and MD-11 operators, but doesn't seem to have been.
There are no other MD-10 operators.....we invented it.
Laughing_Jakal is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 10:02 AM
  #28  
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
bcrosier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Posts: 849
Default

So, is the cause of this COMPLETELY unique to the MD-10, or could it have possible application do the DC-10, MD-11, or even other types? Is this information so sensitive that everyone else needs to be kept in the dark? As an MD-11 pilot, I'd really like to know.
bcrosier is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 10:28 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Laughing_Jakal View Post
There are no other MD-10 operators.....we invented it.
Nothing to be proud of Russ....
Daniel Larusso is offline  
Old 03-31-2010, 10:42 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hyperone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 777 Capt
Posts: 403
Default

Originally Posted by bcrosier View Post
So, is the cause of this COMPLETELY unique to the MD-10, or could it have possible application do the DC-10, MD-11, or even other types? Is this information so sensitive that everyone else needs to be kept in the dark? As an MD-11 pilot, I'd really like to know.
bcrosier, the problem with the high altitude holding is that many FMS's are not designed to keep you out of the coffin corner of high altitude and slow speed driving you below an airspeed that your aircraft can maintain while holding level flight. The ICAO holding speed of 265 kts is simply too slow when above about FL250. The problem is made worse by an FMC that normally limits bank angles to 15 degrees or less for cruise, but will go to 25 degrees for standard rate turns in holding. Even worse, a high altitude stall in the MD-11 or MD-10 may or may NOT be preceded by stick shaker.
You are allowed to ask ATC to hold at 280kts/.80M (whichever is lower) if you expect or encounter turbulence when using FAA TERPS, Old PANS OPS, or New PANS OPS. Fedex Safety says we can and must ask for this higher speed when above FL250.
bcrosier, there's no secret and hopefully all air carrier now train their pilots that if they are directed to hold above FL250, that they do it at 280kts/.80M (or whatever your aircraft's minimum safe speed at altitude in a 25 degree turn is) and tell ATC that's what they are doing.
hyperone is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JetJock16
Regional
278
03-10-2017 02:03 PM
Lindy
Cargo
35
02-07-2010 12:27 PM
vagabond
Money Talk
4
02-06-2009 09:43 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
8
10-30-2008 12:04 PM
Flameout
Major
64
09-17-2008 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices