Go Back   Airline Pilot Central Forums - Find your next job as a Pilot > >
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines
 

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-25-2006, 09:20 AM   #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Freighter Captain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: -400 CAPT
Posts: 483
Default UPS shares fall 14%

UPS Profit Misses Estimates; Shares Fall on Outlook (Update7)

July 25 (Bloomberg) -- United Parcel Service Inc., the world's biggest package shipping company, said second-quarter profit rose less than analysts' estimates and reduced its forecast as international margins fell, sending the shares to their biggest one-day drop ever.

Net income increased 7.6 percent to $1.06 billion, or 97 cents a share, from $986 million, or 88 cents, a year earlier, UPS said today in a statement. UPS forecast third-quarter profit of 87 cents to 91 cents a share, trailing analysts' 97-cent average estimate in a Thomson Financial survey. UPS also said it would buy back $2 billion more of its shares.

Rising fuel costs eroded international margins, to 18.5 percent from 19.9 percent, affecting the fastest-growing business segment at UPS. Atlanta-based UPS and rival FedEx Corp. benefited from overseas shipments as global economic expansion drove freight demand. Sales rose 15 percent to $11.7 billion.

``I can't find anything to get excited about,'' said analyst Andrew Meister of Thrivent Financial for Lutherans in Appleton, Wisconsin, holder of 526,300 shares as of March. ``They missed Street estimates and lowered expectations. It looks like inflationary pressures are cutting into their profit margins.''

UPS's forecast also damped other U.S. stocks as investors interpreted the outlook as a signal that economic growth may be slowing. ``While it is likely an opinion stemming from UPS's current business trends, it sounded like a harbinger for softer numbers,'' Meister said.

Shares Fall

Shares of UPS fell $11.59, or 14 percent, to $68.41 at 12:07 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. FedEx shares fell $3.13, or 2.8 percent, to $107.31. The biggest one-day drop in UPS shares was 8.7 percent in April 2000. UPS held its initial public offering in November 1999.

Second-quarter profit at UPS had been estimated at $1 a share by Jon Langenfeld, a Robert W. Baird & Co. analyst ranked by StarMine Corp. as the most accurate for UPS. That also was the average of 15 analysts in a Thomson Financial survey.

``There is strong downward pressure on international margins,'' said Donald Broughton, a St. Louis-based A.G. Edwards analyst who rates UPS shares ``hold'' and doesn't own them. ``Estimates are going to come down, and the stock is going to come down as well.''

In January, UPS said it expected second-quarter profit would be 97 cents to $1.01 a share. The company also forecast earnings per share for all of 2006 to increase 11 percent to 16 percent, or a range of $3.85 to $4.03. Today, UPS said the full- year profit would be ``at the low end'' of that guidance.

``It looks like expense control was an issue last quarter,'' Broughton said. ``I suspect it will be again this quarter.''

Margin Improvement

Chief Financial Officer Scott Davis said in an interview that higher jet and diesel fuel expense cut profit by $25 million as those costs rose faster than the company anticipated.

UPS expects ``excellent operating profit growth'' in the international package business during the third quarter, with margin improvement from the second quarter, Davis said on a conference call. He didn't say how much.

Domestic business will have a ``minimal increase'' from last year's third quarter, because rail, health care, pension and fuel costs are rising, Davis said.

UPS expects the U.S. economy to ``moderate,'' with a ``slight impact'' on the company's results, Davis said.

`Real-Time Indicator'

``We are a very good real-time indicator of the economy,'' Davis said in the interview. ``We are not a good leading indicator. In today's just-in-time world, people just don't stock inventory.''

U.S. business accounted for $1.1 billion of UPS's $1.5 billion in profit before interest and taxes in the third quarter of 2005. The international segment contributed $318 million. Net income for the quarter last year was $953 million, or 86 cents a share.

Domestic package revenue, UPS's largest unit by sales, rose 7.5 percent, helped by a margin increase to 16.5 percent from 16.1 percent. Average daily volume rose to 13.3 million packages, a 4.7 percent increase.

Profit in the unit that manages and hauls freight shipments rose 38 percent to $47 million as sales rose 63 percent to $2.04 billion. Profit margin growth lagged behind the revenue increase because of costs to integrate an air freight unit bought last year.

International Growth

International package revenue rose 11 percent to $2.23 billion in the second quarter. Package volume growth slowed to 12 percent from 29 percent in the first three months of the year. Three fewer operating days in Europe hurt the results, UPS said.

``The global small package market continues to expand,'' Chief Executive Officer Mike Eskew said in the statement.

International operating profit climbed 4.3 percent to $414 million. That trailed growth of 13.5 percent in the first quarter and 30 percent for 2005. For the third quarter, profit growth from international shipments will exceed the 8.6 percent rate for the first half of 2006, Davis said.

Davis said the company still expects 30 percent revenue growth this year in China, where UPS and others are expanding operations by adding flights.

UPS's lowered forecast ``is a reflection of both ongoing cost pressures and more muted volume expectations,'' said Thomas Wadewitz, a New York-based analyst for J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.

Higher fuel bills, delays in fuel surcharge recoveries and rising repair costs pushed up operating costs by 16.2 percent, Wadewitz said, more than his 14.4 percent estimate.

Today's buyback announcement comes 21 months after the UPS board approved a $2 billion share-repurchase program. The new program would pay for 25 million shares, based on yesterday's closing price. UPS has 1.1 billion shares outstanding.
Freighter Captain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2006, 05:08 PM   #2  
Line Holder
 
FreightDawg2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: MD11
Posts: 53
Default Huh

Still think we should vote down this TA and get more? Idiots!
FreightDawg2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2006, 05:43 PM   #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreightDawg2
Still think we should vote down this TA and get more? Idiots!
You could see that one coming a mile away...
320Driver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2006, 06:50 PM   #4  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,055
Default

FreightDawg2, I wouldn't think of calling you an idiot because of your views on this matter. But please consider a few things. This was a small earnings miss and a huge drop due to intermediate term outlook.

Now why do you think the UPS board of directors approved a stock buy back of multi Billion dollar proportions a few months ago? Why do you think they are sinking a Billion in new sort facilities? Why do you think they are buying Billions of dollars worth of new aircraft?
If you conclude that they believe business will remain good in the long term you might be right, they are making some very big bets to that effect. The stock may go lower short term, but UPS already has the money from the sale of the stock so this really won't have any effect on operating budget.
When the going gets tough only the strong survive and they end up with bigger market share.
Pilot pay only represents .3%(note the decimal) of total operating expense at UPS. Double that and we are still only talking a fraction of 1% of operating cost. Concluding that we are a drag on profits when we are such a small percentage of the workforce with the highest profitability doesn't make much sense.

Last edited by jungle; 07-25-2006 at 07:08 PM.
jungle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2006, 08:54 PM   #5  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: DC-8
Posts: 75
Default

Actually FD,
Stike while the irons are hot, I say vote Hell no and then put UPS on the defensive.

Next question...

BBDC8
BIGBROWNDC8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2006, 09:13 PM   #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
To Stay or Go's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 135
Default

I should have gone to FedEx!!
To Stay or Go is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 03:32 AM   #7  
Line Holder
 
FreightDawg2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: MD11
Posts: 53
Default What is OUR Market Value

How much do you think we are worth, not to UPS but in Market Value...? Gents, I think with this TA we have reached that value. See Tom N.....m's post on the B&G. Don't vote down a TA because someone told you that you were worth more. You have to realize that at some point your value becomes a significant liability. We may already be there!
FreightDawg2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 06:10 AM   #8  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,055
Default

Using that logic, one would be forced to conclude that management pilots are a much greater liability. Do you think UPS has reached the same conclusion? Have you seen the steady raises and bonus money that middle management has recieved over tha last five years? In many cases their one year raise ex-bonus has been more than I will get after waiting FIVE years for a raise.
Why would any negotiator offer their best deal on the first written offer?
jungle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2006, 02:25 PM   #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: A300 Capt.
Posts: 25
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by jungle
Why would any negotiator offer their best deal on the first written offer?
Exactly.
NightFR8Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2006, 08:28 AM   #10  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jungle
when we are such a small percentage of the workforce with the highest profitability doesn't make much sense.
jungle,
Where did you get the info that the air group has the highest profitability? I have heard that the air group is the opposite but necessary for the operation. I am just wondering where your info comes from. Thanks.
Freightpuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
 

 
Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UPS Pool/Classes UofL Cargo 59 11-01-2014 09:07 PM
UPS fall hiring update Freight Dog Cargo 18 08-14-2006 07:15 AM
UPS B747-400F operation b744man Cargo 2 07-31-2006 06:20 AM
JetBlue's Fall From Grace fireman0174 Major 2 04-22-2006 07:04 AM
52 week hi for FedEx shares Sasquatch Cargo 7 03-02-2006 03:27 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 PM.


vBulletin® v3.9.3.5, Copyright ©2000-2019, MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright 2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.1