FDX - Think Before you Vote
#13
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
This guy was at the afternoon hubturn meeting that I attended. He had placed a double sided yellow sheet of paper in each chair with most of these same points. Once the meeting started he tried to dominate it by trying to promote some of these abstract questions. I specifically remember the one about the "mini-RLG" and how we have given back the use of sick leave on reserve. The NC specifically stated that this does not apply to "R" lines, only to a "mini-RLG" that you could receive on a custom or secondary line. They said this is the current practice that we have been living under the current CBA. He was given the "FACTS" last week yet is still spewing this misinformation. I am all for listening to different opinions and learning more but when you try to stir the pot with misinformation you really have to question a persons credibility. I guess there is a reason that the National Enquirer still sells magazines.
The NC States that this is "current practice" - problem is, if this is "current practice", it is a violation of the CBA. The CBA only allows your sick bank to be docked RLG if your line is made entirely of R days and you are sick for all of them. Including "mini RLG" is a give back
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 357
Lets see if I got this right.
If you are awarded a reserve line with two reserve blocks, then call in sick for one of them and are not awarded a trip, there is no deduction in sick bank.
However if you are awarded a VTO line with one week of flying and one week of reserve, then call in sick for the reserve week, your sick bank is deducted whether you are awarded a trip or not.
Am I wrong?
If you are awarded a reserve line with two reserve blocks, then call in sick for one of them and are not awarded a trip, there is no deduction in sick bank.
However if you are awarded a VTO line with one week of flying and one week of reserve, then call in sick for the reserve week, your sick bank is deducted whether you are awarded a trip or not.
Am I wrong?
#15
Lets see if I got this right.
If you are awarded a reserve line with two reserve blocks, then call in sick for one of them and are not awarded a trip, there is no deduction in sick bank.
However if you are awarded a VTO line with one week of flying and one week of reserve, then call in sick for the reserve week, your sick bank is deducted whether you are awarded a trip or not.
Am I wrong?
If you are awarded a reserve line with two reserve blocks, then call in sick for one of them and are not awarded a trip, there is no deduction in sick bank.
However if you are awarded a VTO line with one week of flying and one week of reserve, then call in sick for the reserve week, your sick bank is deducted whether you are awarded a trip or not.
Am I wrong?
#16
Our biggest problem with every contract is the language. We all see these holes or are at least trying to interrupt them the way a company making billions will when they want to. We get crushed by the arbitrators because of the language. The TA should be voted down just on this fact alone. Why is it that the only section I had no question about was union official compensation?
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,109
This has been the current practice for quite some time. I've experienced it, talked to both the Union and Company and it has been this way for some time. As I understand it the verbiage in the TA just made it clearer to understand.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 107
Great Post and he has the stones to sign it.
I appreciate the fact that he bothered to read it and I agree with almost everything he says. I also think the fact we open up dead heading on trains as an accepted practice and get nothing for it sucks. I know it is only limited to certain routes. I'm sure the company won't try to expand this. The company will use this practice to decrease our dead head banks and schedule less time between deadhead and operating trips. You know what less time between the deadhead and revenue operations means? It means we get to work another day for free.
The other think Capt Big Stones didn't mention is that we are allowing the company set a new precedent. Everytime there is some complex issue they don't have to negotiate. This time it is NPRM, next time it is the turmoil in Japan, or the price of oil, or some complex trade bill. We need to try and keep some consistency in what we do so that there is less turmoil and more predictability for our crewmembers. This TA has just put more divisions through a crew force who voted 98% for our last contract and has since been fractured by our union doing the HKG LOA, handling the age 65 thing poorly, and this surprise, "out of the blue" TA.
The other think Capt Big Stones didn't mention is that we are allowing the company set a new precedent. Everytime there is some complex issue they don't have to negotiate. This time it is NPRM, next time it is the turmoil in Japan, or the price of oil, or some complex trade bill. We need to try and keep some consistency in what we do so that there is less turmoil and more predictability for our crewmembers. This TA has just put more divisions through a crew force who voted 98% for our last contract and has since been fractured by our union doing the HKG LOA, handling the age 65 thing poorly, and this surprise, "out of the blue" TA.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Mad Dog Capt
Posts: 226
Like it or not, the guy did make some good points.
Funny how he gets accused of falsehoods--yet it's obvious there are areas in this TA nobody know what is going to occur once we agree to this. (Witness the above posts.) He also mentioned some areas that I've been curious about, that nobody has discussed yet. And where there are portions with real or perceived "givebacks"--don't ya think it's worth a mention?
Funny how he gets accused of falsehoods--yet it's obvious there are areas in this TA nobody know what is going to occur once we agree to this. (Witness the above posts.) He also mentioned some areas that I've been curious about, that nobody has discussed yet. And where there are portions with real or perceived "givebacks"--don't ya think it's worth a mention?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post