Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Amazon Drones, should we worry.. >

Amazon Drones, should we worry..

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Amazon Drones, should we worry..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2013, 07:10 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MeXC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default

Seems also that with someone as sharp as Bezos that this would not be unveiled at all until ready for implementation.
I think its just a "hey look at us" PR moment that will ultimately go nowhere.
--oh, yeah...nice timing on the piece on the eve of Black Monday...what better way to get the Amazon name splashed everywhere than having Buck Rodgers as your spokesperson?
MeXC is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 07:16 AM
  #22  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Originally Posted by blackbox View Post
Or the "Amazonoctocopter" fails mid flight over an interstate and drops the package over an interstate. The package falls at a rate of 9.8 m/s^2 or 32.2 ft/s^2 and comes crashing down on a car traveling at 65 mph. The impact to the windshield kills the driver which then causes a sixteen car pileup….good luck getting these approved. Not to mention delivering the package to the house located on short final which causes multiple go-arounds.
Terminal velocity is what this is called, it is determined by the combination of acceleration from gravity versus the drag created by the flying object, and there is a lot of drag around square shapes such as a cardboard box. If this is a concern, and I suppose faulty boxes or grippers could allow it to happen, the weight limit on the box or even the shape of the box itself could be adjusted to limit terminal velocity to something no worse than a bird falling out of the sky or what have you. The latter may still be unacceptable, especially if the machines want to operate over high density population. There could also be a tether added to the box.

Actually, safety acceptance is not usually based so much on how bad things go if the machine crashes, witness the results of various airplane crashes we have in the world every so often. Rather it is based on probability of the event happening at all. So if Amazon can show these machines have (make up a number) one in thirty million chance of failing, they will be able to establish reasonable safety. These octocopters have a high redundency factor built in anyway, and I bet it is easy to show the chances of catastrophic failure are quite low as it stands.

I think they are a great idea and should be expedited (pardon the pun) by the FAA. They will save a lot of gas, car travel and road congestion, make returns easier, on and on. There is not much of a downside the way see it. Altitudes and routes can be managed to insure safety around airports and other aircraft operating zones.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 07:27 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 260
Default Nothing but hype...

Originally Posted by TTOCSMCC View Post
This reminds me of the flying car in every driveway that has been predicted over and over again (even recently) for the past 50 years.
I'm sure the amazon drones will have just as much success.
Build fulfilment center.
Man fulfilment center.
Move parcel to fulfilment center.
Program drone. File flight plan.
Load drone. Monitor drone.
Return drone.
Recharge/refuel drone.
Maintain drone.

Free advertising -Priceless

While much of this can be automated...ain't worth it...but good hype and free press...
HKFlyr is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 07:54 AM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Cubdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: ATP, CFI etc.
Posts: 6,056
Default

Originally Posted by HKFlyr View Post
...Program drone. File flight plan.
Load drone. Monitor drone.
Return drone.
Recharge/refuel drone.
Maintain drone...While much of this can be automated...ain't worth it...but good hype and free press...
Why not worth it? In theory this machine is cheaper or they wouldn't be pushing it. So shipping rates could be less, roads will be somewhat less populated by delivery trucks, less road wear and (much) less fuel demand, quadracopter fleet can be almost completely automated, no flight plans or hands-on work required, efficiency can increase if changing shifts of van drivers and van fleets are taken out of the equation,and delivery is possible 24/7 and during snow emergencies and so on. I suppose the downside is the fuss in getting it regulated and the cost to the labor force in terms of lost jobs. In general however, technology taken as a whole is a GDP (gross domestic product) increaser so it boosts the overall yield for a given amount of capital investment and we all win when that happens. Countries that adopt advanced technology tend to lead the world in terms of GDP.
Cubdriver is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 08:05 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyBoyd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: FDX 767 FO
Posts: 817
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post

I bet there's all kinds of stuff that housewives will order to get "now", haha....
Full service Octocopter
FlyBoyd is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 08:35 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaydayMark's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD-11 Captain
Posts: 4,304
Default

FedEx predicts records ALL TIME high shipments tonight. More than 11 million packages (that's 126/sec).

That's a LOT of plastic octocopters
MaydayMark is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 09:42 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

I had 215,000 pounds of freight from CDG to MEM the the other night! Wow, most I've ever seen, I thought the 184,000 pounds from CAN to CGN was a lot!! This should be a good season for us at FedEx!! Bright future IMO even with the talk of theses drones! The drone thing won't be viable until it's able to carry many more lbs and many more objects at once and then hit multiple targets in one sortie. Then we're talking about a machine that's about the size of a ATV I would bet, and that will have to be fool proof and completely redundant.
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 10:01 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
cgflier's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: CAPT
Posts: 70
Default

I know ALPA is working with the FAA on US drone policy. They need to make sure that they are only flown by certified pilots. More importantly, they should work toward a new level of Class 1 medical for those over age 65 or over 40 BMI with "Drone Only" as an exception. This could definitely be a win-win.
cgflier is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 12:10 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brownie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 757/767
Posts: 1,128
Default

If thier new prime air resembles thier newly created ground delivery called lasership I wouldn't be to worried about it.
brownie is offline  
Old 12-02-2013, 02:01 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by Cubdriver View Post
Why not worth it? In theory this machine is cheaper or they wouldn't be pushing it. So shipping rates could be less, roads will be somewhat less populated by delivery trucks, less road wear and (much) less fuel demand, quadracopter fleet can be almost completely automated, no flight plans or hands-on work required, efficiency can increase if changing shifts of van drivers and van fleets are taken out of the equation,and delivery is possible 24/7 and during snow emergencies and so on. I suppose the downside is the fuss in getting it regulated and the cost to the labor force in terms of lost jobs. In general however, technology taken as a whole is a GDP (gross domestic product) increaser so it boosts the overall yield for a given amount of capital investment and we all win when that happens. Countries that adopt advanced technology tend to lead the world in terms of GDP.
He is doing this for publicity no way this is a viable means of transporting goods in the near future. How is it going to fly to a house and put a package on the porch etc or is the plan just to release it from the UAV like a bomb? Going to take one fast UAV to deliver to another city in the same state much less another state all together. Also, think about the number of UAVs required vrs a truck to carry the same amount of packages.
HIFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KC10 FATboy
Safety
26
02-27-2017 03:27 PM
HKFlyr
Cargo
0
09-05-2013 06:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Engineers & Technicians
4
09-20-2012 05:42 AM
shadow1995
Military
10
08-16-2012 07:06 PM
alarkyokie
Military
3
09-21-2011 08:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices