I'm a little scared right now because I agree with Tony.


Some at both ends of the spectrum are pushing for no or a smaller A plan. Those at the top will be gone in 5 years or less and won't have to deal with the consequences. Those at the bottom will have a long time to accumulate wealth under a revised system.

The A plan will NEVER be paid anywhere near 100 cents on the dollar during a conversion. Those with little invested don't care anywhere near as much the middle 70-80%.

 

I don't think 4,600 of us will ever agree on what the ideal retirement plan would look like. There are pros and cons to every proposal I've ever heard, including the proposal to pay us in gold. Currently our A plan exceeds what would be protected by the PBGC if FedEx were to ever go bankrupt and dump the A plan. Currently there is no way under tax schemes to completely replace the value of an A plan with B plan contributions. I am in favor of rebalancing to the extent that it can be done, and I am in favor of offering options. For example, some people would opt for lump sum payouts, some would not.

What I strongly believe, though, is that we should ALL -- senior to junior to not-yet-been-hired -- have the same plans, or at least the same options. The day we show The Company it's OK to discriminate against one minority group is the same day we show The Company it's OK to discriminate against ANY minority group, and that's were we begin the slide from unity of one large group to fighting amongst many sub-groups. DON'T give The Company that wedge.






.

 

Uhh, Alaska Airlines…. "A" fund?, and they're a "legacy"…
Plus, they can retire with 30 yrs of service, regardless of age… at least that's
what my buds that fly there have told me? oh and they have instantaneous trip trading…

just saying.

Z

 

Well said Tony C.......

I am concerned about my retirement but I am more concerned with creating a sub class within our group......which is what this is all about.

 

.............
+1

 

It will only be a B-scale if we allow it. There is a number out there that would make us A-scalers envious. Let's see where it takes us.

 

My guess current hiring trends, 35 years.

 

See paragraphs 4 & 5 below...the retirement benefits for new hires changed in 2009

Alaska Airlines Pilots Approve New Four-Year Contract

5/19/2009 12:05 p.m.

SEATTLE. The pilots of Alaska Airlines, represented by the Air Line Pilots Association, Int'l (ALPA), have voted to approve a new four-year contract.

Of the 95 percent of pilots who voted, 84 percent did so in favor of the agreement.

Effective April 1, 2009, the new contract for Alaska's 1,455 pilots includes pay increases, retirement options for current employees, and work rules that provide increased flexibility for pilots and improved productivity for the airline.

The company's defined benefit pension plan will be closed to pilots hired after ratification, reducing retirement funding risk.

Pilots hired post ratification will instead participate in a 401(k) program.

Additionally, pilots will participate in the same performance incentive program as the airline's non-union employees, executives, dispatchers and flight attendants, and will share equitably in health care costs.

"This pilot group, and pilots across our industry, have watched our pay, benefits, job security and quality of life erode since 9/11," said Capt. Bill Shivers, chairman of the Alaska Master Executive Council.

"While this contract doesn't restore everything, it does provide increases in pay and improvements in our work schedule and retirement flexibility while allowing our company to remain poised for success.

We believe this is a positive step toward repairing the relationship between this pilot group and our management so that we can work together to achieve a company culture where everyone succeeds and prospers together."

"We appreciate the hard work by everyone involved in helping us achieve this multi-year agreement, which provides the right foundation for our pilots and airline to succeed long term," Alaska Airlines President Brad Tilden said. "I'd like to thank our pilots for maintaining their focus on safety and providing great customer service throughout a long negotiation process."

ALPA and Alaska Airlines began contract negotiations in January 2007 and reached a tentative agreement last month.

The pilots' last contract, awarded by an arbitrator in May 2005, cut pilot pay by 21 percent to 35 percent.

ALPA represents nearly 54,000 pilots at 36 airlines in the U.S. and Canada, among them the 1,455 pilots of Alaska Airlines, including the 60 pilots currently on furlough.

For more information, visit www.alaPilots.com.

 

Unlike PBS, I've not yet heard anybody say it would be a "deal breaker" for them.

 

Unless we all have the same plan, or at least the same options, a B-scale group would be a deal breaker for me.