FDX--14-04 Bid
10-11-2014, 05:01 AM
#103
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,196
Originally Posted by StarClipper
What make you think the PAX 777 can't be converted
10-11-2014, 02:23 PM
#104
gets every day off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Retired MD11 Capt
Posts: 705
Originally Posted by golfandfly
Thanks for your prediction. Having any luck getting a job for the fedex feeders?
You may have to start out as VP or something, but that's only until you learn the names around the office.
10-11-2014, 05:40 PM
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,622
Maybe this has been brought up in previous threads, but I didn't see it.
Why is the company allowed to put a -1 on some categories, but not all of them? For example, IND767 and EUR757 are protected. People have displaced into those categories, but nobody was excessed from those categories.
As PC said, this is an excess bid, not a vacancy bid. So why are they by default filling vacancies?
Why is the company allowed to put a -1 on some categories, but not all of them? For example, IND767 and EUR757 are protected. People have displaced into those categories, but nobody was excessed from those categories.
As PC said, this is an excess bid, not a vacancy bid. So why are they by default filling vacancies?
10-11-2014, 07:00 PM
#106
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: MD-11 Galley Biatch
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
Maybe this has been brought up in previous threads, but I didn't see it.
Why is the company allowed to put a -1 on some categories, but not all of them? For example, IND767 and EUR757 are protected. People have displaced into those categories, but nobody was excessed from those categories.
As PC said, this is an excess bid, not a vacancy bid. So why are they by default filling vacancies?
Why is the company allowed to put a -1 on some categories, but not all of them? For example, IND767 and EUR757 are protected. People have displaced into those categories, but nobody was excessed from those categories.
As PC said, this is an excess bid, not a vacancy bid. So why are they by default filling vacancies?
My guess is they r hoping to minimize the need for a vacancy bid (besides HKG) by funneling excessed guys into the seats that would've had a vacancy
10-11-2014, 07:05 PM
#107
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Originally Posted by PurpleToolBox
Maybe this has been brought up in previous threads, but I didn't see it.
Why is the company allowed to put a -1 on some categories, but not all of them? For example, IND767 and EUR757 are protected. People have displaced into those categories, but nobody was excessed from those categories.
As PC said, this is an excess bid, not a vacancy bid. So why are they by default filling vacancies?
Why is the company allowed to put a -1 on some categories, but not all of them? For example, IND767 and EUR757 are protected. People have displaced into those categories, but nobody was excessed from those categories.
As PC said, this is an excess bid, not a vacancy bid. So why are they by default filling vacancies?
Originally Posted by Brew Master
All 767 & 757 seats are available for the excess. IND 767 FO will go pretty junior too. It's the fleets they want to grow, so yes they kinda are filling un-declared vacancies
My guess is they r hoping to minimize the need for a vacancy bid (besides HKG) by funneling excessed guys into the seats that would've had a vacancy
My guess is they r hoping to minimize the need for a vacancy bid (besides HKG) by funneling excessed guys into the seats that would've had a vacancy
10-11-2014, 07:18 PM
#109
Part Time Employee
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Dispersing Green House Gasses on a Global Basis
Posts: 1,918
Originally Posted by TonyC
No, the follow-on vacancy bid will not "fix" anything. Talk to the junior pioneers currently in Hong Kong who will be frozen out..
at the end
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
