FedEX instructor
#12
Back on line
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Out of the sim, back in the real!
Posts: 99
Thanks for the info. In that case, are there any full time instructors on here who can answer some questions? what's the job like? schedule? Is there any pension, or long term retirement?
Thanks,
AWACS
Thanks,
AWACS
#14
Back on line
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Out of the sim, back in the real!
Posts: 99
Is there some reason that the union did not cover your instructors in the CBA? I'd like to think that someone would be thinking about bringing your instructors "In House." Or is this a big can of worms not to be discussed?
AWACS
AWACS
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Expect to support everything you comment on here during your interview.
#16
They are off the street positions. In our current negotiations one of our main points is we want solid training, and the best people to know what we face are guys and gals who have flown the line. That said, pros make anywhere from 60-100k per year, without the same benefits, etc so its obviously a less costly way for the company to add training staff. How many can they add? What events can a pro teach? Well--that will be a function of negotiations...and the FAA approval process.
FYI...other airlines are doing the same thing. Many folks may know this but the former chief of hiring for UAL (CV) is now back on the line and HR is doing the same job. Why? Probably cheaper to get an HR person than pay a line captain to run the program? Who is BEST at knowing the right candidate for the job? I think many of us would agree a pilot, but pilots cost more than other labor, so there is always a push to downsize labor costs.
I am not on the negotiating team, but I was a block rep for a while. I am not sure how much negotiating capital I would burn for a guy who'd been hired off to be a pro to have a guaranteed line job. It seems to me the COMPANY would want to do this for the obvious reason of creating a highly capable and motivated training force. If they want to bring people in to work the sims, then tell them they are good enough for that job but not good enough for the line, I'll let THEM deal with the consequences. In the past, the interview process was a flow-through, and I think you had a lot of good pilots go to the school house as a way in the door. Now? I dunno. I think it would be very, very difficult to go back to my cubicle for 60k a year teaching systems after being told I wasn't welcome on the varsity. Then again, I don't expect our current management to have much of a "feel" for what pilots think, so I'm not sure they care one way or the other.
If a pilot did down an event, with a pro as the IP that was rejected from the line, I think they could easily make a case the instructor was either A) substandard (since he wasn't line material) or B) did a poor job briefing or executing the event (based on the lack of motivation after the rejection). A simple way to prevent all of that is have the pro interview once, and demand line-level performance in all facets of the interview. When and if the time commitment was met and if line pilots were needed, that pilot could then flow on to the line. Not sure why we drifted from that, but its a new thing. Having an instructor sitting around with hurt feelings is a new phenomenon, and I am wondering how its going to play out...
FYI...other airlines are doing the same thing. Many folks may know this but the former chief of hiring for UAL (CV) is now back on the line and HR is doing the same job. Why? Probably cheaper to get an HR person than pay a line captain to run the program? Who is BEST at knowing the right candidate for the job? I think many of us would agree a pilot, but pilots cost more than other labor, so there is always a push to downsize labor costs.
I am not on the negotiating team, but I was a block rep for a while. I am not sure how much negotiating capital I would burn for a guy who'd been hired off to be a pro to have a guaranteed line job. It seems to me the COMPANY would want to do this for the obvious reason of creating a highly capable and motivated training force. If they want to bring people in to work the sims, then tell them they are good enough for that job but not good enough for the line, I'll let THEM deal with the consequences. In the past, the interview process was a flow-through, and I think you had a lot of good pilots go to the school house as a way in the door. Now? I dunno. I think it would be very, very difficult to go back to my cubicle for 60k a year teaching systems after being told I wasn't welcome on the varsity. Then again, I don't expect our current management to have much of a "feel" for what pilots think, so I'm not sure they care one way or the other.
If a pilot did down an event, with a pro as the IP that was rejected from the line, I think they could easily make a case the instructor was either A) substandard (since he wasn't line material) or B) did a poor job briefing or executing the event (based on the lack of motivation after the rejection). A simple way to prevent all of that is have the pro interview once, and demand line-level performance in all facets of the interview. When and if the time commitment was met and if line pilots were needed, that pilot could then flow on to the line. Not sure why we drifted from that, but its a new thing. Having an instructor sitting around with hurt feelings is a new phenomenon, and I am wondering how its going to play out...
#17
FedEX instructor
This ^^^^^^ is a situation that is NOT unique to FedEx...
If I were negotiating, I might be easily convinced to expend capital to get all instructing done by current or formerly current, line qualified pilots, like folks that have lost their medical or retired etc...
It is a scope issue, plain and simple.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If I were negotiating, I might be easily convinced to expend capital to get all instructing done by current or formerly current, line qualified pilots, like folks that have lost their medical or retired etc...
It is a scope issue, plain and simple.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#18
I think you get about 12-13 days off a month and you might also be doing sims in the middle of the night.
Probably same health and insurance benefits package that any cubicle commando gets.
I would hold out for another airline job if you are competitive for other airlines and actively flying but if you want to live in memphis the rest of your life might be a good gig.
#19
This ^^^^^^ is a situation that is NOT unique to FedEx...
If I were negotiating, I might be easily convinced to expend capital to get all instructing done by current or formerly current, line qualified pilots, like folks that have lost their medical or retired etc...
It is a scope issue, plain and simple.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If I were negotiating, I might be easily convinced to expend capital to get all instructing done by current or formerly current, line qualified pilots, like folks that have lost their medical or retired etc...
It is a scope issue, plain and simple.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It would be the opposite
Retired guys are more than welcome to continue their employment in non-flying positions
Please don't retire from a career on the line, then return in a capacity which reduces the need for line pilots
Retire Gracefully!
#20
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post