Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Inertia device

Old 12-27-2014, 07:05 AM
  #11  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Default

We were told when I went through 74 school that a Pan Am crew successfully evacuated from the top hatch with inertial reels during an (attempted) ground hijacking in Karachi, Pakistan.
Considering the hight of the 747 upper deck and the (presumed) age of the Pan Am crew, I'm sure they felt any risk and fear of using these devises was preferable to the alternative outside the cockpit door.
dckozak is offline  
Old 12-27-2014, 01:37 PM
  #12  
El Capitan
Thread Starter
 
Kougarok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 615
Default

I don't care for the design and would've preferred they left the slide in.
Kougarok is offline  
Old 12-27-2014, 02:00 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
awax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak View Post
Considering the hight of the 747 upper deck and the (presumed) age of the Pan Am crew, I'm sure they felt any risk and fear of using these devises was preferable to the alternative outside the cockpit door.
That's pretty much the crux, if you're going to use these things, it's because you have lots of motivation. The 747-400 has two upper deck slides which would be preferable, but if you're using the reels it's better than the alternative (fire, terrorist, etc.). My opinion is that they're there for aircraft certification reasons only as the windows don't open. As for their effectiveness? Who knows. I doubt they get checked on a Chinese HMV and it's also limited by the ability to hold on. Spin the wheel, take your chances.
awax is offline  
Old 12-27-2014, 03:05 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by dckozak View Post
We were told when I went through 74 school that a Pan Am crew successfully evacuated from the top hatch with inertial reels during an (attempted) ground hijacking in Karachi, Pakistan.
Considering the hight of the 747 upper deck and the (presumed) age of the Pan Am crew, I'm sure they felt any risk and fear of using these devises was preferable to the alternative outside the cockpit door.
True.

Pan Am Flight 73 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I also recall that one of the twenty passengers killed was the Captain's wife.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 12-27-2014, 03:42 PM
  #15  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

I flew the -100 and -200 at Evergreen. We were shown a training film (TWA) with a "pilot" using the reel, similar to the Lufthansa film shown here. The instructor had been a long-time TWA indoc instructor.

After the film, the instructor told us the "pilot" was in fact a Hollywood stuntman in a pilot uniform. Not shown:

When he hit the ground, he had a dislocated shoulder.

We also had the "diapers." Rubberized canvas shorts you could hook the reels to with clips (you could do either hand-hold, or connect to the shorts).

Neither one sounded enticing, but I figured if I needed it, I'd rather use the pants, than slide down a razor-blade.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 12-28-2014, 07:23 AM
  #16  
El Capitan
Thread Starter
 
Kougarok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 615
Default

Originally Posted by UAL T38 Phlyer View Post
I flew the -100 and -200 at Evergreen. We were shown a training film (TWA) with a "pilot" using the reel, similar to the Lufthansa film shown here. The instructor had been a long-time TWA indoc instructor.

After the film, the instructor told us the "pilot" was in fact a Hollywood stuntman in a pilot uniform. Not shown:

When he hit the ground, he had a dislocated shoulder.

We also had the "diapers." Rubberized canvas shorts you could hook the reels to with clips (you could do either hand-hold, or connect to the shorts).

Neither one sounded enticing, but I figured if I needed it, I'd rather use the pants, than slide down a razor-blade.
Having used an inertia reel here's my thoughts-

You absolutely don't want to use the diaper unless you're incapacitated. It takes a lot longer to get into and out of. And as previously stated you're going to be using this thing to get out of the airplane in a hurry.

Make sure and deploy the handle so you can get both hands on it.

In the 767 face towards the front of the airplane and don't take a big step off.

Make sure your passport is in your pocket if you're in a foreign country.
Kougarok is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 08:01 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jonnyjetprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,408
Default

Originally Posted by Kougarok View Post
I don't care for the design and would've preferred they left the slide in.
All versions of the 747 have slides for the upper deck. This is in addition to the slide or slides.
jonnyjetprop is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 09:37 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Retired
Posts: 651
Default

Originally Posted by Kougarok View Post
I don't care for the design and would've preferred they left the slide in.
It varies a bit with configuration, but if you look at the MMEL it becomes clear that there need to be 2 ways out of the upper deck. On the 400F that is one slide and one reel per crewmember.

On the 400C (BCF) you still have the two slides, so all the reels can be inop/missing if both slides are servicable. If one slide is inop then you are back to needing one reel per crewmember. (This is why the BCF can carry more bodies than there are reels -- if both slides are operative.)

On passenger birds an inop slide gets into limitations on the number of pax on the upper deck, and I assume that is the number that can get down the stairs and out a main deck door in 90 seconds. In any case that brings you back to needing the reels for the operating crew.
742Dash is offline  
Old 12-29-2014, 02:09 PM
  #19  
Are we there yet??!!
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,010
Default

On quite a few of the freighters, the upperdeck L-1 door has been disabled and thus only one slide remains in the upper deck.

We had one F/E accidentally knock the slide pack out to deploy condition and the slide pack departed the aircraft, impacted the ramp, and did not inflate.

One company I worked for did test the inertial reels for one class.
One guy broke his ankle or foot or leg don't remember which and I one guy was cut up a little on the metal tapes. The reels were never used again in escape training, just the same Pan Am video that everybody has seen ...like a 1000 times.
Thedude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ufgatorpilot
Technical
0
10-07-2009 06:00 PM
Bowersbum
Flight Schools and Training
34
12-01-2008 04:03 PM
RXS676
Flight Schools and Training
5
09-07-2008 02:37 PM
UnlimitedAkro
Hangar Talk
73
09-27-2007 05:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices