![]() |
Originally Posted by aviatorhi
(Post 780226)
Let me throw out a hypothetical... Let's say someone with an ATP, 727 type, FE rating (jet) and 8000 TT, 1000 FE and age 30 applies for a job. Should a college degree be "controlling" on an applicant like that?
|
Alas, the qualifications I mentioned are not mine at this time, they are those of a friend.
Now I will poses similar qualifications around that age, but I have no desire to fly for a Major (or any sort of airline) in the ConUS. I just wanted to gauge what the general perception was of a highly competent and skilled pilot as well as a highly personable and genuine individual. The funny thing is that pilots with those qualifications can command higher pay and respect overseas is amusing to me (and others). And the only phrase that adequately describes the attitudes I've seen in this discussion is "high maka maka". |
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 780261)
There's no requirement to retire, but yes, you must be done doing "front line" operations on the month you become 56. Besides, not everybody, even with the current rules, will have 20 years "good time" at age 56.
|
Originally Posted by meyers9163
(Post 779897)
Very true.... I have a lot of respect, as many do, for those whom have served... But most whom are pilots and in the military will also have degrees, most likely....
Originally Posted by seafeye
(Post 780023)
A four year degree is only required because some HR lady has one and believes that only people who have one are qualified. Where-as self-motivation, self-education, passion, common-sense and general intelligence is far more important.
I've known some darn good Captains who've logged over 10,000 hours in the left seat and whom I've learned a lot, but they couldn't be hired by some airlines because they lacked a four-year degree. Most were family men who married young and could never make the financial sacrifice to gain a degree while providing for their family. Their choice, but in many cases I think it is our industry's loss. |
Originally Posted by aviatorhi
(Post 780291)
Alas, the qualifications I mentioned are not mine at this time, they are those of a friend.
Now I will poses similar qualifications around that age, but I have no desire to fly for a Major (or any sort of airline) in the ConUS. I just wanted to gauge what the general perception was of a highly competent and skilled pilot as well as a highly personable and genuine individual. The funny thing is that pilots with those qualifications can command higher pay and respect overseas is amusing to me (and others). And the only phrase that adequately describes the attitudes I've seen in this discussion is "high maka maka". I agree that someone with half the qualifications can get a equal or better paying job overseas. The supply side has allowed the bar to be raised for the majors and lowered overall. Kind of an interesting dynamic we have here. |
Beagle65, you're making a similar point to what I am... which is asking the question of why "College Degree" is overriding thousands of hours of valid experience.
acl65, I understand that, however let me throw this out for you to consider... If the HR people are checking a box which says "College Experience" and only printing those resumes for further consideration... how much more difficult is it to check a box that says "Boeing Experience and PIC Type Rating" or "Extensive Experience in Related Field"? |
Originally Posted by aviatorhi
(Post 780316)
If the HR people are checking a box which says "College Experience" and only printing those resumes for further consideration... how much more difficult is it to check a box that says "Boeing Experience and PIC Type Rating" or "Extensive Experience in Related Field"?
|
And Beagle, let me be clear, I'm not (and never was) disagreeing with you, but let me know if you agree with this...
To sum it all up... it is a broken system, not only in the way that regional pilot pay is reflected, but also in how we determine what good qualifications and good judgement is these days and on to how a company should and does treat the employees it has. It's been on a downward spiral since Eastern was taken apart, and it will continue to do that until people start getting off their high horses and using common sense again. |
Originally Posted by squawkoff
(Post 780299)
If you don't have 20 years good time(good time is where your main job is controlling air traffic not working in an office 8 hours a day) it's by choice. However, they have been giving waivers to work past age 56 on a case by case basis.
Also, there are cases of direct hire military who did not possess 20 years at age 56. I had both instances in my last facility. |
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
(Post 780337)
There are other ways to not get 20 years. Let's say you decided not to go to work on Aug 3, 1981? If you got rehired 15 years after Ronny Reagan fired your butt, you'd probably not have 20 years at age 56.
Also, there are cases of direct hire military who did not possess 20 years at age 56. I had both instances in my last facility. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:05 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands