![]() |
Originally Posted by aviatorhi
(Post 780331)
To sum it all up... it is a broken system, not only in the way that regional pilot pay is reflected, but also in how we determine what good qualifications and good judgement is these days and on to how a company should and does treat the employees it has. It's been on a downward spiral since Eastern was taken apart, and it will continue to do that until people start getting off their high horses and using common sense again.
The system is indeed broken. Hiring is largely done by office pogues who rarely, if ever, step on the ramp. The reality of life in the cockpit is as foreign to them as life on Mars yet they're the ones selecting who is going to be a "good employee" and who isn't. The pay issue is different. If the corporate types had their way even legacy airline pilots would be making the same as the building janitor, if not less. To a large extent, regional pilots are their own worst enemy where pay is concerned. In the past, most were "too busy" to become involved in union activities since they didn't plan on sticking around long enough to see a new contract. "Look, dude, I'm only here for two years. You do whatever you want with that union stuff. Just leave me out of it". Now they are living under the conditions which they and their predecessors allowed to happen. The American pilot "Green Book" contract is about 2 inches thick. The Eagle pilot contract is half that thickness. Why? Largely due to the fact Eagle has only been around for a third of the time the American pilots have been unionized. Strong unions generate strong contracts. The caveat is that those contracts take time to generate. Lots of time is required, such as 3-4 contract periods, before a regional airline can expect to see "career" level improvements to the contract. Airline Deregulation: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty Air Transportation: Deregulation and Its Consequences |
Rare shortcut
Originally Posted by CaptFuzz
(Post 779967)
For that matter, most professional careers don't require a generalized 4 year degree. Professional career fields usually require a professional degree (MD, DDS, JD, ect.)
|
Originally Posted by tomgoodman
(Post 780425)
True. I know a veterinarian (DVM) who was admitted to the Texas A&M vet school after only two years of (outstanding) undergrad work. I don't think this happens often, however.
|
Compass requires a degree because Delta requires a degree. Just wait until later this year when you have to pass the Delta Psych eval and testing just to make $23,000
|
Thats the point!!! for only 23,000. If you ask someone to have a Degree, plus hour, plus,plus you will have to have a decent pay. For 23,000 good luck. LOL......
|
Originally Posted by mynameisjim
(Post 780543)
Compass requires a degree because Delta requires a degree. Just wait until later this year when you have to pass the Delta Psych eval and testing just to make $23,000
|
Originally Posted by tomgoodman
(Post 780425)
True. I know a veterinarian (DVM) who was admitted to the Texas A&M vet school after only two years of (outstanding) undergrad work. I don't think this happens often, however.
|
Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
(Post 784295)
In today's economy, you can hardly get an interview for a professional job WITH a college degree. Try entering a medical school without a college degree today, not 40 years ago. I think you are thinking about your generation when a high school diploma was good enough for most jobs. Not today.
Anyone read AIN this month. The article about Automation : End Game is an eye opener for sure. |
Originally Posted by Purpleanga
(Post 784264)
I can just see it.. Do you like pets? NO. What is your favorite color? Teal. What do you see in this picture? A humpback whale and bushes. OK sir you can't go to Delta because you're a Psycho.
The degree requirement is just a discriminator the HR people use to make the stack of applications smaller. It does nothing to ensure the caliber of applicant getting passed on to the next phase of evaluation. HR people are not dumb. They know that qualified applicants are being kicked out by the degree requirement. They just don't care because there are still plenty of applicants left afterwards to easily fulfill hiring requirements. |
Originally Posted by rdneckpilot
(Post 784943)
That test is retarded for sure. I have a very close friend that was rejected due to the shrinks opinion. He was an aircraft commander on B-52's and was highly recommended by several internal Delta guys. After getting his FU letter from HR his friends did some digging and found out the shrink said he was not assertive enough and would not be a good candidate for Captain. This for a guy the U.S.A.F entrusted to command a crew hauling around nuclear weapons to go and potentially kill a few million people. The evaluation is extremely subjective and a waste of time.
The degree requirement is just a discriminator the HR people use to make the stack of applications smaller. It does nothing to ensure the caliber of applicant getting passed on to the next phase of evaluation. HR people are not dumb. They know that qualified applicants are being kicked out by the degree requirement. They just don't care because there are still plenty of applicants left afterwards to easily fulfill hiring requirements. I know of many similar stories regarding phyc. evals. to support this...sad, but true. One day it will be officially revealed what a load of crap these exams are...Mark my words. Yep, the 4 year degree requirement is in place just to make some lazy (or over worked) HR persons job easier... Who would you want to fly your family around: (A) The pilot with 4 years of studding philosophy under their belt, while waiting for an apple to fall on their head? (B) The pilot who spent that same 4 years gaining experience, while in command of real world flight operations. Now, option (B) is no longer considered:confused: What a joke. ATR:cool: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:30 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands