Search

Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Corporate MU2 info.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2008 | 11:41 AM
  #21  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

I flew Jetstream 3100/3200 series for 14 years at a regional. 13000 hours with one precautionary shutdown. ( bad fuel controller)
Reply
Old 10-09-2008 | 09:05 PM
  #22  
SonnyD's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: ONT f/o
Default

Originally Posted by packageflyer
I flew Jetstream 3100/3200 series for 14 years at a regional. 13000 hours with one precautionary shutdown. ( bad fuel controller)
Whoa! Gee, guess your scan's pretty sharp! <bg>

MU-2 cabin noise -
With aftermarket soundproofing, how quiet is the cabin, especially toward the back? Better than a late model King Air, by chance? Assume 4-blade props and a good door seal.

For comparison, I have some time in the back of a Metro, which was awful, of course.
Reply
Old 10-10-2008 | 06:24 AM
  #23  
trafly's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SonnyD
Whoa! Gee, guess your scan's pretty sharp! <bg>

MU-2 cabin noise -
With aftermarket soundproofing, how quiet is the cabin, especially toward the back? Better than a late model King Air, by chance? Assume 4-blade props and a good door seal.

For comparison, I have some time in the back of a Metro, which was awful, of course.
I don't think there are many turboprops that are quieter than a newer Kingair
Reply
Old 10-10-2008 | 02:32 PM
  #24  
Cheyenne Driver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Default

What about the P180?
Reply
Old 10-12-2008 | 06:38 PM
  #25  
trafly's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cheyenne Driver
What about the P180?
Like I said, I don't think there are many.......

Never flown the Pasta Rocket, so couldn't speak about it, but if anyone's offering.......winkwink
Reply
Old 03-16-2009 | 07:19 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: MU2-60
Default

We bought a -60 back in July 08, we've flown it 350 hours since and it's been a great aircraft. I'd just as soon be flying it as a KA200. If your company is on a budget the MU is the way to go. It has lots of performance at low cost.
Reply
Old 03-20-2009 | 09:57 AM
  #27  
i121ADX's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: Just a broker now.
Default

Originally Posted by Boris Badenov
I'm pretty sure Iowapilot and I work for the same company. We did the "recurrent" package at Simcom, rather than the "initial", since we did a fair bit of training in the airplane and got our 135 PIC signoff before going down there. It's a fine program, and Leif definitely knows his stuff, but the sims are non-motion and my recollection is that they don't "feel" much like the plane itself. I'm not sure I'd want to try flying it without some actual time in the plane. I've rarely heard anything bad about Howell and plenty good.

My impression of the plane overall is that it's a great performer, and perfectly safe, but as everyone says, it requires a bit more effort when something goes wrong than a KA or other similar aircraft. It's nothing a normally skilled pilot who is current and stays that way can't handle. It's also built like a brick outhouse. No idea where the reputation for being difficult in ice came from, as I've been in a fair amount of ice in it and never had any white-knuckle moments.

Operators that I'm aware of are: ACT, Air 1st, Bankair (I think they've parked at least some), Epps, and I think Royal still has some, although I don't know whether they're still flying. Those are of course all 135 cargo. Don't know how many corporate operators there are.
Royal no longer flies the MU2. McNeely out of AWM has one...I think thats it for MU2 Cargo Operators.
Reply
Old 01-22-2017 | 01:06 PM
  #28  
New Hire
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: MU2-60 / PIC
Default

Originally Posted by Cheyenne Driver
Any MU2 pilots out there that would recommend initial training with Howell or SimCom ? Why?
SimCom ... Just completed MU2 training with SimCom at Orlando. Great facility for initial ground school. Sim was better than I expected. Flight training was excellent and Initial Check Ride was through enough to feel as comfortable as one could feel as a low time MU2 pilot flying single pilot. Follow up questions are answered within minutes of texting, usually with a phone call.
Reply
Old 01-27-2017 | 06:11 PM
  #29  
SAROVA's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: PIC
Default

Originally Posted by Loneeagleswa
SimCom ... Just completed MU2 training with SimCom at Orlando. Great facility for initial ground school. Sim was better than I expected. Flight training was excellent and Initial Check Ride was through enough to feel as comfortable as one could feel as a low time MU2 pilot flying single pilot. Follow up questions are answered within minutes of texting, usually with a phone call.
Awesome, 9 yrs later...lol. Good luck. Fly safe.
Reply
Old 01-27-2017 | 06:26 PM
  #30  
TiredSoul's Avatar
All is fine at .79
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 4,486
Likes: 42
From: Paahlot
Default

Useless info alert:

Owner of the flight school where I did my IR:
There is no substitute for experience...

There, I've said it.
Go with the experience.

Duh...note to self..check thread date.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdannehl
Fractional
6
10-05-2008 05:33 PM
USMCFLYR
Corporate
3
09-24-2008 07:02 PM
Niner
Corporate
9
09-16-2008 02:56 PM
Cheyenne Driver
Foreign
0
09-08-2008 04:15 PM
av8or
Corporate
2
08-12-2008 04:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices