Search
Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

CJ versus CJ3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-2013, 08:32 PM
  #1  
Sitting on the sidelines
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 436
Default CJ versus CJ3

Q: did my type rating and all my time in a CJ3. Been asked to do contract work in an original CJ. What will the insurance company say? It's not enough work to justify Flightsafety for differences.
Navajo31 is offline  
Old 03-31-2013, 04:40 AM
  #2  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,511
Default

Originally Posted by Navajo31
What will the insurance company say?
Not trying to be a smartass...but you'll have to ask the insurance company.

It depends entirely on how the policy language was written that they'll accept any recent CE525 training, or if it must be CitationJet/CJ specific.

Remember...no FADEC (or spirited climb)
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 03-31-2013, 10:52 AM
  #3  
Sitting on the sidelines
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 436
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP View Post
Not trying to be a smartass...but you'll have to ask the insurance company.

It depends entirely on how the policy language was written that they'll accept any recent CE525 training, or if it must be CitationJet/CJ specific.

Remember...no FADEC (or spirited climb)
I know...ask the insurance company. The real question is, if they say no can you argue with them.

No spirited climb - but thrust reversers. Do the brakes suck too?
Navajo31 is offline  
Old 04-01-2013, 06:09 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 124
Default

There is enough differences that if you have never flown anything older then a 3, I wouldn't recommend jumping into the left seat of a straight CJ without another experienced pilot.

Example...Thrust reversers are great and all but can really suck when one deploys @ V1 and you haven't trained for something like this in years, if ever.
GrummanCT is offline  
Old 04-01-2013, 07:43 AM
  #5  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,511
Default

Attenuators.

Citationjet/CJ1/CJ2 has thrust attenuators...not reversers.

BoilerUP is offline  
Old 04-01-2013, 08:30 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 124
Default

PM - 60 knots
PF - Stow Thurst Attenuators
GrummanCT is offline  
Old 04-07-2013, 03:34 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
680crewchief's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Just because the MEL says we can, doesn't mean we should
Posts: 324
Default

Originally Posted by GrummanCT View Post
PM - 60 knots
PF - Stow Thurst Attenuators
They stow and deploy automatically...at least I think they do. It's been a while. I'll beat you to it, "That's what she said".
680crewchief is offline  
Old 04-07-2013, 03:35 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
680crewchief's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: Just because the MEL says we can, doesn't mean we should
Posts: 324
Default

CJ3 and 4 don't need them because the FADECs spool down fast enough on landing.
680crewchief is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Duksrule
Hiring News
20
09-28-2012 03:59 PM
BoilerUP
Corporate
2
09-06-2010 06:36 PM
Balut
Cargo
43
10-21-2009 07:28 PM
MikeB525
Regional
6
09-28-2007 03:20 PM
fireman0174
Major
4
05-24-2006 08:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices