![]() |
Confused...
Does taking Hydroxy hurt the climate, or save it?
|
What kills me is they are now worried about "Safety and Efficacy" of drugs that have been handed out like Candy by the military for YEARS.
|
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 3035040)
What kills me is they are now worried about "Safety and Efficacy" of drugs that have been handed out like Candy by the military for YEARS.
|
|
Originally Posted by Chief Brody
(Post 3035050)
Hey look its OOfff
|
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 3035040)
What kills me is they are now worried about "Safety and Efficacy" of drugs that have been handed out like Candy by the military for YEARS.
Also them... We can't hand use this stuff because...side effects. What's that? Heck ya you need to keep handing those opioids out with PEZ dispensers. |
Originally Posted by emersonbiguns
(Post 3034839)
(emphasis mine)
Not peer reviewed, not published. Maybe you could find a second career picking cherries? Science is such a sham, maybe we could start a movement called #fakescience ?
Originally Posted by Nvrgofullretard
(Post 3034855)
lol, you’re right dude. All of these countries with their army of qualified doctors are doing this just cause it’s awesome to tank ones economy. They want your guns and money!
Are you referring to actual medical doctors or the WHO, Fauci and Birx et. al. I'm not sure what you're driving at with this comment. Regarding medical, you would never get a second opinion - ever? Right. Trust the first diagnosis? How about you not cherry pick one study that may or may not be true, and let the professionals who have dedicated their lives to studying diseases handle this. I have a VERY good life long friend who is an ER doctor in Manhattan and he said it’s a ****ing warzone. His very words were “this is not a normal flu”. How are you going to refute this statement? How can you, an armchair rocket surgeon, say he is wrong? I have an idea, how about you leave this to qualified people, and not your partisan news channel. Not cheery picked. It's the first of many studies and the only one to date which has been published. Stanford University was the first to put their findings out in the public. The NIH in conjunction with CDC are conducting the antibody study. This is just a part of that larger effort. "The first one, which will be funded by the National Institutes of Health, is already underway in six metropolitan regions in the U.S. It was started in Seattle when that outbreak happened, then New York City, then we quickly kicked in the San Francisco Bay area, and now we’ve added Los Angeles, Boston, and Minneapolis." (NIH, 2020) As to your your "doctor friend". Pretty sure you're telling a lie. If you really knew a doctor(s), you would know they are pretty stoic. This is very much out of character for an MD, especially one who is serving in the ER. I understand that we are going to learn from this, and will find better procedures to minimize the impact in the future, but let’s not get a bunch of old people killed by rushing this. What do they call this sort of argument fallacy??? Something, something.....anyway, we'll call Stanford's study "anecdotal" but the data certainly is pointing to a larger exposure to the bug - as you would expect. The studies will be completed by Sept - Oct 2020. You'll learn for sure about how many of us have been exposed to the bug (underestimated), recovered, and moved on with life. Again, the math will change. The rates will be lowered significantly - probably in line with a flu. The funny thing about people like you, is that you would tweak if some dude came up to your flight deck and told you how to get from A to B. And yet you are happily willing to tell doctors how to handle this? Give me a break. Just like you are willing to tell us how we need to stay bunkered down for a flu. What's your point? i bet you are also a climate denier. You know, cause FOX says it’s a hoax right? Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter - climate change. See, I get it. I don't watch faux news BTW. |
Originally Posted by Chief Brody
(Post 3035050)
Hey look its OOfff
|
Originally Posted by Phins2right
(Post 3035070)
It will take about 2-3 years for that to happen. It won't make a difference to the outcome anyway. Stanford was confident on their data so they released it. They are not a bunch of rookies. You don't like what they published - again, take it up with Stanford University.
Sounds like you're more interested in confirmation bias than science. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3035101)
I guess I don’t have to worry about homelessness during furlough; I can just live rent free in your head
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands