COVID infections 10,000x (NYC - March)
04-23-2020, 04:56 AM
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 84
COVID infections 10,000x (NYC - March)
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/u...gtype=Homepage
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
04-23-2020, 06:01 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2018
Position: Sitting
Posts: 500
Originally Posted by OVC010CB
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/u...gtype=Homepage
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
04-23-2020, 08:54 AM
#4
Banned
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Originally Posted by OVC010CB
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/u...gtype=Homepage
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
04-23-2020, 09:47 AM
#6
Banned
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Originally Posted by OVC010CB
Today's antibody study indicates at least 21% of New York City residents have already been infected.
Best of luck with social distancing and stay-at-homes!!!
Best of luck with social distancing and stay-at-homes!!!
04-23-2020, 09:51 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 774
Originally Posted by Slaphappy
We will look back at this and roll our eyes at the Hysteria this virus caused. It's also something to think about when the global warming alarmists pushing their prpredictions.
Yep, I’ll be skeptical if you use a crisis to push the agenda you’ve been espousing for years. Sweden didn’t care about flattening the curve, if they amount of death will be similar if you isolate or not, just get it over with and risk an extremely high hospitalization rate, not saying they were right, just another lane to take. These initial models have been so far off, just like many of us presume the global warming models could be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
04-23-2020, 04:22 PM
#8
Seat 0B
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 777 FO
Posts: 791
04-23-2020, 05:36 PM
#9
Banned
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Originally Posted by JetDoc
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
