COVID infections 10,000x (NYC - March)
04-23-2020 | 04:56 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
COVID infections 10,000x (NYC - March)
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/u...gtype=Homepage
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
04-23-2020 | 06:01 AM
#2
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 578
Likes: 39
From: Earth
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/u...gtype=Homepage
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
04-23-2020 | 08:54 AM
#4
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/23/u...gtype=Homepage
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
For every COVID diagnosis in NYC in March, it's possible there were already 10,000 infections in circulation.
Does social distancing have any positive effect? Perhaps not, especially when it was instituted so late.
It also means that the illness is even less deadly than currently estimated.
04-23-2020 | 09:38 AM
#5
Thread Starter
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
04-23-2020 | 09:47 AM
#6
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
We will look back at this and roll our eyes at the Hysteria this virus caused. It's also something to think about when the global warming alarmists pushing their prpredictions.
04-23-2020 | 09:51 AM
#7
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 898
Likes: 46
Yep, I’ll be skeptical if you use a crisis to push the agenda you’ve been espousing for years. Sweden didn’t care about flattening the curve, if they amount of death will be similar if you isolate or not, just get it over with and risk an extremely high hospitalization rate, not saying they were right, just another lane to take. These initial models have been so far off, just like many of us presume the global warming models could be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
04-23-2020 | 04:22 PM
#8
Seat 0B
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
From: 777 FO
04-23-2020 | 05:36 PM
#9
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
