Don't Take Horse dewormer
09-08-2021, 12:59 AM
#121
Pilot
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Large cabin Bizjet
Posts: 448
Originally Posted by Red Forman
How does one wash down a beach?
09-08-2021, 07:11 AM
#122
Gets Weekdays Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted by Tfork
That's not for COVID...back in 2017 COVID wasn't even around.
However, please show your proof that employees of the FDA are hiding evidence that Ivermectin works for COVID. You know what's laughable? What you think is proof Ivermectin is for COVID.
However, please show your proof that employees of the FDA are hiding evidence that Ivermectin works for COVID. You know what's laughable? What you think is proof Ivermectin is for COVID.
If I had the money, I would put together some studies and gather the data together and put the package together to get it approved by FDA. I don’t have the money - so who will do it then? Not Merck or Pfizer, that’s for sure…not any company trying to develop a new drug to meet the need, that’s for sure…
09-08-2021, 07:38 AM
#123
Always Working
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 281
Originally Posted by skywatch
I never said it was a miracle drug for COVID!!! I said it was a miracle drug in response to the uneducated that refer to it as a horse dewormer, like it isn’t for human consumption. It is for human consumption, it is a miracle drug (which you said it wasn’t) and there are a lot of physicians that feel it has a place as an off label treatment for COVID.
If I had the money, I would put together some studies and gather the data together and put the package together to get it approved by FDA. I don’t have the money - so who will do it then? Not Merck or Pfizer, that’s for sure…not any company trying to develop a new drug to meet the need, that’s for sure…
If I had the money, I would put together some studies and gather the data together and put the package together to get it approved by FDA. I don’t have the money - so who will do it then? Not Merck or Pfizer, that’s for sure…not any company trying to develop a new drug to meet the need, that’s for sure…
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
09-08-2021, 09:02 AM
#124
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Reclining
Posts: 840
Originally Posted by Tfork
Ok, fair enough. You can call it a miracle drug for parasite infections, but not for COVID. No, Merck won't fund a study because the evidence isn't there. Now, some NGA might fund a study but they should do it correctly and not with flawed data as has been done.
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
https://www.biznews.com/health/2021/...ctin-treatment
09-08-2021, 09:06 AM
#125
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Position: baller, shot caller
Posts: 961
Originally Posted by Tfork
Ok, fair enough. You can call it a miracle drug for parasite infections, but not for COVID. No, Merck won't fund a study because the evidence isn't there. Now, some NGA might fund a study but they should do it correctly and not with flawed data as has been done.
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3
I'm not saying that is what happened here, and I really don't care to be honest, but if there actually was a highly effective treatment, especially one that is cheap and readily available, then you can bet your rear end it would never see any kind of approval while these big pharma EUA vaccines are still in force. Money always wins out in the end.
09-08-2021, 09:20 AM
#126
Gets Weekdays Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted by Tfork
…No, Merck won't fund a study because the evidence isn't there…
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
Again, to try to be clearer, for FDA to approve Ivermectin for COVID treatment, someone has to make the case - spend money to put together a package and bring it to FDA to approve. NONE of the drug companies will do that, it seems - there is no money in it. Do you not get that part?
09-08-2021, 09:50 AM
#127
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Originally Posted by Tfork
Ok, fair enough. You can call it a miracle drug for parasite infections, but not for COVID. No, Merck won't fund a study because the evidence isn't there. Now, some NGA might fund a study but they should do it correctly and not with flawed data as has been done.
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
I'm still waiting for any evidence the FDA employees are hiding Ivermectin data which would get it approved for treating COVID.
Hey, did you hear about all those people in Oklahoma at the hospital with Ivermectin poisoning? Yeah, it wasn't true. You want evidence that there are powers trying to discredit Ivermectin? Pretty obvious isn't it?
09-08-2021, 11:56 AM
#128
Always Working
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 281
Originally Posted by skywatch
Missed it again. Merck won’t find a study because they are developing their own NEW (PATENTED) drug for treatment of COVID-19 that they have spent $$$ developing and will make $$$$$ selling - why would they fund a study for an off patent drug they will not make much (if any) money on, that will compete with the one that will make lots of money?
Again, to try to be clearer, for FDA to approve Ivermectin for COVID treatment, someone has to make the case - spend money to put together a package and bring it to FDA to approve. NONE of the drug companies will do that, it seems - there is no money in it. Do you not get that part?
Again, to try to be clearer, for FDA to approve Ivermectin for COVID treatment, someone has to make the case - spend money to put together a package and bring it to FDA to approve. NONE of the drug companies will do that, it seems - there is no money in it. Do you not get that part?
09-08-2021, 12:08 PM
#129
Gets Weekdays Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted by Tfork
Yes, someone has to make the case and it does take money. There are many entities that fund studies that aren't drug companies. Do you get that part? Even if they fund the study, it still has to be constructed correctly and then peer-reviewed before the FDA rules on it.
https://today.uconn.edu/2021/05/why-...-regulates-2/#
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/developmen...-process-drugs
I can’t make it any clearer than this…you are dangerously close to willful ignorance.
09-08-2021, 02:46 PM
#130
Always Working
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2021
Posts: 281
Originally Posted by skywatch
Name one. Name one entity other than a drug company that will currently or even has in the past worked with FDA on a drug approval that was not a drug company. Name just one.
https://today.uconn.edu/2021/05/why-...-regulates-2/#
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/developmen...-process-drugs
I can’t make it any clearer than this…you are dangerously close to willful ignorance.
https://today.uconn.edu/2021/05/why-...-regulates-2/#
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/developmen...-process-drugs
I can’t make it any clearer than this…you are dangerously close to willful ignorance.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
