Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
US Appeals Court Affirms [Hold on] Mandate >

US Appeals Court Affirms [Hold on] Mandate

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

US Appeals Court Affirms [Hold on] Mandate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2021, 05:54 PM
  #281  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2021
Posts: 371
Default

Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 View Post
besides the Texas case.....is there past precedent with mandates with EUA vaccines? What if it was proven that they weren't actually vaccines at all .....but a therapeutic? Makes sense why definitions have been changing lately....... it would undercut the 1905 case would it not?
I love that you're STILL trying to spin the FDA approved vaccine as falling under a EUA.

It's been months. Everyone's moved on. But this is the hill you're gonna die on.

Last edited by 400000Dead; 12-18-2021 at 06:32 PM.
400000Dead is offline  
Old 12-18-2021, 06:31 PM
  #282  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,352
Default

Originally Posted by MiLtoMajor123 View Post
besides the Texas case.....is there past precedent with mandates with EUA vaccines? What if it was proven that they weren't actually vaccines at all .....but a therapeutic? Makes sense why definitions have been changing lately....... it would undercut the 1905 case would it not?

I’m aware of any EUA vaccine use with well documented litigation outside of the military to my knowledge, but that has different problems given that it’s the government.

When the whole issue of mandates came up around the time the vaccines became available, everyone and their brother started writing legal opinions on the subject to include the FDA, OSHA, DOJ, etc.

The article below is not authoritative, but does highlight some of the discussions at that time.

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtoo...ccine-eua.aspx

Now different states may pass other legislation that explicitly outlaw EUA mandates, but I’m not aware of anything.

I’m not sure what you mean with the 1905 case as that was I’m found in favor of the the state (not a private company) issuing vaccine mandates. Either way, I don’t see anyone changing the characterization of the vaccines to a therapeutic given that the most common vaccine given for respiratory illnesses is the flu vaccine and it has worse efficacy.
ThumbsUp is offline  
Old 12-18-2021, 06:45 PM
  #283  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,702
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post


Tobacco OTH has obvious health ramifications for a large majority of chronic users. And it;s addictive.
Apparently, boosters are addictive too.....
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 12-18-2021, 07:15 PM
  #284  
Gets Weekends Off
 
velosnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,170
Default

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver View Post
Apparently, boosters are addictive too.....
No, but stupidity is.
velosnow is offline  
Old 12-19-2021, 09:21 AM
  #285  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 217
Default

Originally Posted by 400000Dead View Post
I love that you're STILL trying to spin the FDA approved vaccine as falling under a EUA.

It's been months. Everyone's moved on. But this is the hill you're gonna die on.
So can you get the fully approved shot or not? Judge just said it isn't interchangeable with the non approved BioNTech shot. If you ask for a Comirnaty labeled shot will they give you the run around saying the BioNTech is the same thing? Who's spinning who here? Remember the excuse...oh well we are just having to use up the same formula BioNTech before we can produce and ship out the Comirnaty labeled fully approved shot......well.....I agree with you.......It's been months.
MiLtoMajor123 is offline  
Old 12-19-2021, 09:55 AM
  #286  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Default

Originally Posted by 400000Dead View Post
I love that you're STILL trying to spin the FDA approved vaccine as falling under a EUA.

It's been months. Everyone's moved on. But this is the hill you're gonna die on.
Why won't the FDA release the data they used in the approval of the "other" jab then?

75 years? Yeah, nothing going on here.

Pharma, FDA revolving door? Yeah nothing to see here. Heck even Sen Warren is raising the BS flag on it

You're right, people have moved on from the china flu hysteria, at least in most of the country.

And when it comes to losing my freedoms, guaranteed by the Constitution, yes I will chose that hill. See you on the green.
Drum is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cgull
United
127
04-05-2013 03:43 AM
MX727
Hangar Talk
22
09-11-2010 11:21 AM
loungelzrd
Aviation Law
2
12-31-2008 12:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices