Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
The political repercussions grow… >

The political repercussions grow…

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

The political repercussions grow…

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2021, 07:00 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Originally Posted by Zard View Post
Pregnancy is a risk. It's also a very expensive endeavor for a company that pays for employee insurance.

As a condition for continued employment, Widget LLC decided that all women should take birth control. This will lower costs and improve worker health, as well as reduce the risks of pregnancy complications. Women who decline are free to find employment elsewhere.

after all, it's not coercion. It's what's best for the employees of Widget LLC.

*Widget LLC is not liable, nor may ever be liable, from any medical complications of complying with its stated medical health policy.
Wrong, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned discrimination based on ….sex and other things. Prior to that, there were all kinds of rules for stewardesses—age, marriage, for example. Try again, but don’t use a “protected status” example.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 11-29-2021, 07:04 AM
  #62  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,501
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Not coercion in the least. When a private company can read you your rights, indict you, convict and imprison you, that’s coercive. Company says jump, you can jump or leave.
Well, the SCOTUS agreed with you in Sutton v United Airlines.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/97-1943.ZD.html

But subsequently, the Americans with Disabilities Act was changed to forbid them from discrimination against those the FAA found medically qualified. It is doubtful that the court would find that a vaccine mandate would be legal today, absent a federal mandate. And the success of a federal mandate in court is doubtful…
Excargodog is offline  
Old 11-29-2021, 07:21 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 952
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Wrong, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 banned discrimination based on ….sex and other things. Prior to that, there were all kinds of rules for stewardesses—age, marriage, for example. Try again, but don’t use a “protected status” example.

Ahh, but people who identify as men can be birthing people too now. Birth control for all my friends. #equality

And we aren't discriminating at Widget, inc. it's for their own good, remember?
Zard is offline  
Old 11-29-2021, 07:25 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Originally Posted by Zard View Post
Ahh, but people who identify as men can be birthing people too now. Birth control for all my friends. #equality

And we aren't discriminating at Widget, inc. it's for their own good, remember?
#birthingperson

If you think an 18 year old is too young to own a rifle, but a 16 year old is mature enough to vote, a 14 year old is old enough to get an abortion without parental consent, and a three year old is mature enough to decide their own gender, then you are the problem!
RI830 is offline  
Old 11-29-2021, 07:30 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Originally Posted by Zard View Post
Ahh, but people who identify as men can be birthing people too now. Birth control for all my friends. #equality

And we aren't discriminating at Widget, inc. it's for their own good, remember?
Please try to stick within reality.
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 12-01-2021, 05:12 AM
  #66  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,512
Default

If illness is mild and equivalent to the common cold...WHY SHOULD ANYBODY CARE?

Nobody ever gave a nanosecond's thought about the four human coronaviruses that cause colds mutating into some uber-virulent strain, so why the constant irrational fear porn in the media?

All this is serving to do is alienate rational, moderate people who believed in mitigations and got vaccinated when they could but are growing effing exhausted at rampant stupidity and finger-pointing from people with unrealistic expectations of viral control and containment.
BoilerUP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Delta
50
03-06-2020 09:29 AM
Flytolive
Union Talk
8
11-26-2016 01:34 PM
Sink r8
Delta
6
07-13-2015 02:13 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
04-21-2011 09:56 PM
Copperhed51
Hangar Talk
14
05-02-2010 09:41 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices