Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Delta cutting back flying >

Delta cutting back flying


Notices

Delta cutting back flying

Old 07-15-2018 | 10:29 AM
  #61  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 663
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Profit sharing is up 19% over last year so far. Non-fuel costs are supposed to be reduced in the next two quarters. I think February 14 will be pretty good.
Reply
Old 07-15-2018 | 11:12 AM
  #62  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 663
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by SilentLurker
[MENTION=8313]Mesabah[/MENTION] is right.

Fuel Speculators have been driving prices higher than actual value of supply increases.

This is why Pres. Trump is now considering releasing some oil from the SPR (strategic petroleum reserves).


Some of you can joke all you want but it’s facts. Read more & watch more Bloomberg TV/CNBC/Financial Times/Fox Business/CNN Money.

Oil speculators even more than OPEC (according to economists) are propping up oil prices, so much so OPEC is considering increasing production, because prices have risen much more quick than expected.

Don’t mock, get facts! Poster above is correct.
Not saying its not true, but if it is that's a classic bubble. If your serious I'd short oil about Oct. 20th. I'm thinking its more related to carbon surcharges during the EU/brexit transition but I've been wrong before. More regulation diversity means more blends and more cost to produce.
Reply
Old 07-15-2018 | 12:28 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,868
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Profit sharing is up 19% over last year so far. Non-fuel costs are supposed to be reduced in the next two quarters. I think February 14 will be pretty good.
Profit sharing % or the amount set aside? I don’t want to be into another 10 page discussion but we as pilots are getting a significantly smaller share of the pool this year. 19% more set aside means a smaller check on 14 Feb. We had this discussion in Feb with the effects of the change in the last quarter.
Keep in mind also the effects of the fuel cost increase are going to be a lot more in the 3rd and 4th quarter.
Reply
Old 07-15-2018 | 01:03 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SilentLurker
[MENTION=8313]Mesabah[/MENTION] is right.

Fuel Speculators have been driving prices higher than actual value of supply increases.

This is why Pres. Trump is now considering releasing some oil from the SPR (strategic petroleum reserves).


Some of you can joke all you want but it’s facts. Read more & watch more Bloomberg TV/CNBC/Financial Times/Fox Business/CNN Money.

Oil speculators even more than OPEC (according to economists) are propping up oil prices, so much so OPEC is considering increasing production, because prices have risen much more quick than expected.

Don’t mock, get facts! Poster above is correct.
He is considering releasing oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve because the midterms are November 6. The SPR is supposed to be used for “strategic” reasons affecting the US. Not political reasons like more Dems might be win House seats because gas prices are high.

Not surprisingly, the White House, thinking they’re being clever, have Iranian oil sanctions kicking in November 4th. Oil speculators, also being clever people, plan ahead.

Not to mock, but I might add the OPEC likes high prices. OPEC’s mission statement: "coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of its member countries and ensure the stabilization of oil markets, in order to secure an efficient, economic and regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers, and a fair return on capital for those investing in the petroleum industry."

i.e. keep prices high

Surely we don’t have to debate this?

Last edited by ERflyer; 07-15-2018 at 01:33 PM.
Reply
Old 07-15-2018 | 02:04 PM
  #65  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 378
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Yes, it’s not turned out like we hoped.
Please explain. I have heard our VPs of Flight Ops say exactly the opposite. Are they not being truthful. Just adding I have heard this multiple times in the last few years from them.
Reply
Old 07-16-2018 | 04:31 AM
  #66  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

The refinery brought around a 45 million benefit the last qtr according to the press release. What it has brought that’s not totally accountable every qtr is a smaller and less volatile crack spread every day. While the smaller and less volatile crack spread helps all airlines it has certainly brought order to a market that had shown wild swings for years prior to the refinery opening.
Reply
Old 07-16-2018 | 05:55 AM
  #67  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer
Not to mock, but I might add the OPEC likes high prices. OPEC’s mission statement: "coordinate and unify the petroleum policies of its member countries and ensure the stabilization of oil markets, in order to secure an efficient, economic and regular supply of petroleum to consumers, a steady income to producers, and a fair return on capital for those investing in the petroleum industry."

i.e. keep prices high

Surely we don’t have to debate this?
It's actually the opposite of what you say. OPEC has been trying to devastate the US oil industry.
Reply
Old 07-16-2018 | 05:57 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,868
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Dorfman
Please explain. I have heard our VPs of Flight Ops say exactly the opposite. Are they not being truthful. Just adding I have heard this multiple times in the last few years from them.
Read all the quarterly reports. We make money some quarters and lose money other quarters. Nothing close to repaying our investment and potential future liabilities. The extra jet A available in the NE lowered everyone’s price so we gained no real advantage there.
United and American both said they would watch our results closely before deciding to purchase a refinery. They don’t seem very interested at this point.
Reply
Old 07-16-2018 | 06:05 AM
  #69  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

It was said many years ago when the refinery was bought that it wasn’t just going to benefit Delta but most others also. The main benefit was lowering and smoothing the crack spread which had been out of control. Trainer was to add stability to the jet fuel market. Which it has. It has also allowed Delta to partially eliminate that in our plan. It has done that while turning a profit.

I am a pilot. Not an airline exec. But even I can see that Trainer has been a success.
Reply
Old 07-16-2018 | 06:07 AM
  #70  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

I don’t think there are other refineries for purchase. It’s not like the housing market. They are not out there for sale. As I recall Trainer was a steal and a one of a kind opportunity that was jumped on by Delta.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
molson247
Regional
123
07-07-2008 12:25 PM
wannabepilot
Flight Schools and Training
34
07-07-2008 12:15 PM
Bucking Bar
Regional
33
01-07-2008 07:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices