Delta Not Scheduling Interviews
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
I think it will depend on the DGI success rate, if they spook the FO's here at 9E again to flee, and we wind up with a large demographic of Propel-ers, they may have no choice. There is a reason regional FO pay is now $70K vs $25K a few years ago. I just don't see management offering six figures to regional FO's in order to avoid a flow.
The Propel students by the time they reach a DCI carrier will have already taken the full Delta mainline interview. That’s something that no DCI pilot can say they’ve done. With that in mind, that shuts down any talk of them being in a flow program.
I know the numbers they are targeting for the Propel program and no I won’t post it here or anywhere. If they meet those numbers it will further undercut any demand you may see for a 9E flow from 9E pilots.
I admire your continued push for a flow, but you truly don’t have any idea how against the flow Delta is. It’s institutionalized at every level.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,555
Likes: 3
I think it will depend on the DGI success rate, if they spook the FO's here at 9E again to flee, and we wind up with a large demographic of Propel-ers, they may have no choice. There is a reason regional FO pay is now $70K vs $25K a few years ago. I just don't see management offering six figures to regional FO's in order to avoid a flow.
#34
We used to have far fewer 30 hour layovers. They are a direct result of asking and getting longer break times and minimum behind the door time. How would you suggest the company handle layover cities where they need 30 hour layovers for the early departures?
As an aside anytime you make changes to work rules there are unintended consequences. If for example we get a 5:15 daily minimum in the next contract commutable trips will become very rare on domestic rotations.
As an aside anytime you make changes to work rules there are unintended consequences. If for example we get a 5:15 daily minimum in the next contract commutable trips will become very rare on domestic rotations.
There's probably an intelligent way to change this, but the company isn't incentivized to try since the current way works with the 5:15 ADG. I'm not sure how a min day vs. min ADG would affect commutability, but if we were able to change a portion of the bid package, see how pilots like them and adjust from there it would be better than current. Heck, look at the categories where they have 1 day trips that are 7-8 hours and they are the 1st trips gone, 73n is an excellent example. Pilots generally prefer to work fewer days for identical pay, it's not a radical concept.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 362
I don't have a supercomputer at my disposal to optimize such a scenario, but I was recently rerouted into somebody else's 30 hour layover and the company just DH'd us out as soon as we had our legal rest and we continued on our merry way, likely the other crew DH'd in to resume their layover but I don't know for certain.
There's probably an intelligent way to change this, but the company isn't incentivized to try since the current way works with the 5:15 ADG. I'm not sure how a min day vs. min ADG would affect commutability, but if we were able to change a portion of the bid package, see how pilots like them and adjust from there it would be better than current. Heck, look at the categories where they have 1 day trips that are 7-8 hours and they are the 1st trips gone, 73n is an excellent example. Pilots generally prefer to work fewer days for identical pay, it's not a radical concept.
There's probably an intelligent way to change this, but the company isn't incentivized to try since the current way works with the 5:15 ADG. I'm not sure how a min day vs. min ADG would affect commutability, but if we were able to change a portion of the bid package, see how pilots like them and adjust from there it would be better than current. Heck, look at the categories where they have 1 day trips that are 7-8 hours and they are the 1st trips gone, 73n is an excellent example. Pilots generally prefer to work fewer days for identical pay, it's not a radical concept.
#36
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
The Propel students by the time they reach a DCI carrier will have already taken the full Delta mainline interview. That’s something that no DCI pilot can say they’ve done. With that in mind, that shuts down any talk of them being in a flow program.
I know the numbers they are targeting for the Propel program and no I won’t post it here or anywhere. If they meet those numbers it will further undercut any demand you may see for a 9E flow from 9E pilots.
I admire your continued push for a flow, but you truly don’t have any idea how against the flow Delta is. It’s institutionalized at every level.
I know the numbers they are targeting for the Propel program and no I won’t post it here or anywhere. If they meet those numbers it will further undercut any demand you may see for a 9E flow from 9E pilots.
I admire your continued push for a flow, but you truly don’t have any idea how against the flow Delta is. It’s institutionalized at every level.
You can't staff DCI with full interviewed Delta pilots, that's a fact, it's been tried.
#38
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 362
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,839
Likes: 160
I don't have a supercomputer at my disposal to optimize such a scenario, but I was recently rerouted into somebody else's 30 hour layover and the company just DH'd us out as soon as we had our legal rest and we continued on our merry way, likely the other crew DH'd in to resume their layover but I don't know for certain.
There's probably an intelligent way to change this, but the company isn't incentivized to try since the current way works with the 5:15 ADG. I'm not sure how a min day vs. min ADG would affect commutability, but if we were able to change a portion of the bid package, see how pilots like them and adjust from there it would be better than current. Heck, look at the categories where they have 1 day trips that are 7-8 hours and they are the 1st trips gone, 73n is an excellent example. Pilots generally prefer to work fewer days for identical pay, it's not a radical concept.
There's probably an intelligent way to change this, but the company isn't incentivized to try since the current way works with the 5:15 ADG. I'm not sure how a min day vs. min ADG would affect commutability, but if we were able to change a portion of the bid package, see how pilots like them and adjust from there it would be better than current. Heck, look at the categories where they have 1 day trips that are 7-8 hours and they are the 1st trips gone, 73n is an excellent example. Pilots generally prefer to work fewer days for identical pay, it's not a radical concept.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 73
It may not be the case today but the company has always had a very open policy to rotation construction. The union had full access to Carmine and free reign to produce better results within cost constraints. We almost never could better the companies rotation construction without a large increase in credit time.
I honestly don't think the ultra-efficient trips and rotation construction (45 day vs 30 day optimizing) are yielding career-sustainable trip quality. Any gains the company thinks they have made / are making could quickly be eaten up by increased sick and fatigued usage.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



